Cargando…

Evaluation of logistic regression models and effect of covariates for case–control study in RNA-Seq analysis

BACKGROUND: Next generation sequencing provides a count of RNA molecules in the form of short reads, yielding discrete, often highly non-normally distributed gene expression measurements. Although Negative Binomial (NB) regression has been generally accepted in the analysis of RNA sequencing (RNA-Se...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Choi, Seung Hoan, Labadorf, Adam T., Myers, Richard H., Lunetta, Kathryn L., Dupuis, Josée, DeStefano, Anita L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5294900/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28166718
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-017-1498-y
_version_ 1782505329037148160
author Choi, Seung Hoan
Labadorf, Adam T.
Myers, Richard H.
Lunetta, Kathryn L.
Dupuis, Josée
DeStefano, Anita L.
author_facet Choi, Seung Hoan
Labadorf, Adam T.
Myers, Richard H.
Lunetta, Kathryn L.
Dupuis, Josée
DeStefano, Anita L.
author_sort Choi, Seung Hoan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Next generation sequencing provides a count of RNA molecules in the form of short reads, yielding discrete, often highly non-normally distributed gene expression measurements. Although Negative Binomial (NB) regression has been generally accepted in the analysis of RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) data, its appropriateness has not been exhaustively evaluated. We explore logistic regression as an alternative method for RNA-Seq studies designed to compare cases and controls, where disease status is modeled as a function of RNA-Seq reads using simulated and Huntington disease data. We evaluate the effect of adjusting for covariates that have an unknown relationship with gene expression. Finally, we incorporate the data adaptive method in order to compare false positive rates. RESULTS: When the sample size is small or the expression levels of a gene are highly dispersed, the NB regression shows inflated Type-I error rates but the Classical logistic and Bayes logistic (BL) regressions are conservative. Firth’s logistic (FL) regression performs well or is slightly conservative. Large sample size and low dispersion generally make Type-I error rates of all methods close to nominal alpha levels of 0.05 and 0.01. However, Type-I error rates are controlled after applying the data adaptive method. The NB, BL, and FL regressions gain increased power with large sample size, large log2 fold-change, and low dispersion. The FL regression has comparable power to NB regression. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that implementing the data adaptive method appropriately controls Type-I error rates in RNA-Seq analysis. Firth’s logistic regression provides a concise statistical inference process and reduces spurious associations from inaccurately estimated dispersion parameters in the negative binomial framework. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12859-017-1498-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5294900
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52949002017-02-09 Evaluation of logistic regression models and effect of covariates for case–control study in RNA-Seq analysis Choi, Seung Hoan Labadorf, Adam T. Myers, Richard H. Lunetta, Kathryn L. Dupuis, Josée DeStefano, Anita L. BMC Bioinformatics Methodology Article BACKGROUND: Next generation sequencing provides a count of RNA molecules in the form of short reads, yielding discrete, often highly non-normally distributed gene expression measurements. Although Negative Binomial (NB) regression has been generally accepted in the analysis of RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) data, its appropriateness has not been exhaustively evaluated. We explore logistic regression as an alternative method for RNA-Seq studies designed to compare cases and controls, where disease status is modeled as a function of RNA-Seq reads using simulated and Huntington disease data. We evaluate the effect of adjusting for covariates that have an unknown relationship with gene expression. Finally, we incorporate the data adaptive method in order to compare false positive rates. RESULTS: When the sample size is small or the expression levels of a gene are highly dispersed, the NB regression shows inflated Type-I error rates but the Classical logistic and Bayes logistic (BL) regressions are conservative. Firth’s logistic (FL) regression performs well or is slightly conservative. Large sample size and low dispersion generally make Type-I error rates of all methods close to nominal alpha levels of 0.05 and 0.01. However, Type-I error rates are controlled after applying the data adaptive method. The NB, BL, and FL regressions gain increased power with large sample size, large log2 fold-change, and low dispersion. The FL regression has comparable power to NB regression. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that implementing the data adaptive method appropriately controls Type-I error rates in RNA-Seq analysis. Firth’s logistic regression provides a concise statistical inference process and reduces spurious associations from inaccurately estimated dispersion parameters in the negative binomial framework. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12859-017-1498-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-02-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5294900/ /pubmed/28166718 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-017-1498-y Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Methodology Article
Choi, Seung Hoan
Labadorf, Adam T.
Myers, Richard H.
Lunetta, Kathryn L.
Dupuis, Josée
DeStefano, Anita L.
Evaluation of logistic regression models and effect of covariates for case–control study in RNA-Seq analysis
title Evaluation of logistic regression models and effect of covariates for case–control study in RNA-Seq analysis
title_full Evaluation of logistic regression models and effect of covariates for case–control study in RNA-Seq analysis
title_fullStr Evaluation of logistic regression models and effect of covariates for case–control study in RNA-Seq analysis
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of logistic regression models and effect of covariates for case–control study in RNA-Seq analysis
title_short Evaluation of logistic regression models and effect of covariates for case–control study in RNA-Seq analysis
title_sort evaluation of logistic regression models and effect of covariates for case–control study in rna-seq analysis
topic Methodology Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5294900/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28166718
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-017-1498-y
work_keys_str_mv AT choiseunghoan evaluationoflogisticregressionmodelsandeffectofcovariatesforcasecontrolstudyinrnaseqanalysis
AT labadorfadamt evaluationoflogisticregressionmodelsandeffectofcovariatesforcasecontrolstudyinrnaseqanalysis
AT myersrichardh evaluationoflogisticregressionmodelsandeffectofcovariatesforcasecontrolstudyinrnaseqanalysis
AT lunettakathrynl evaluationoflogisticregressionmodelsandeffectofcovariatesforcasecontrolstudyinrnaseqanalysis
AT dupuisjosee evaluationoflogisticregressionmodelsandeffectofcovariatesforcasecontrolstudyinrnaseqanalysis
AT destefanoanital evaluationoflogisticregressionmodelsandeffectofcovariatesforcasecontrolstudyinrnaseqanalysis