Cargando…
Validation of a Smartphone Image-Based Dietary Assessment Method for Pregnant Women
Image-based dietary records could lower participant burden associated with traditional prospective methods of dietary assessment. They have been used in children, adolescents and adults, but have not been evaluated in pregnant women. The current study evaluated relative validity of the DietBytes ima...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5295117/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28106758 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu9010073 |
_version_ | 1782505369766985728 |
---|---|
author | Ashman, Amy M. Collins, Clare E. Brown, Leanne J. Rae, Kym M. Rollo, Megan E. |
author_facet | Ashman, Amy M. Collins, Clare E. Brown, Leanne J. Rae, Kym M. Rollo, Megan E. |
author_sort | Ashman, Amy M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Image-based dietary records could lower participant burden associated with traditional prospective methods of dietary assessment. They have been used in children, adolescents and adults, but have not been evaluated in pregnant women. The current study evaluated relative validity of the DietBytes image-based dietary assessment method for assessing energy and nutrient intakes. Pregnant women collected image-based dietary records (via a smartphone application) of all food, drinks and supplements consumed over three non-consecutive days. Intakes from the image-based method were compared to intakes collected from three 24-h recalls, taken on random days; once per week, in the weeks following the image-based record. Data were analyzed using nutrient analysis software. Agreement between methods was ascertained using Pearson correlations and Bland-Altman plots. Twenty-five women (27 recruited, one withdrew, one incomplete), median age 29 years, 15 primiparas, eight Aboriginal Australians, completed image-based records for analysis. Significant correlations between the two methods were observed for energy, macronutrients and fiber (r = 0.58–0.84, all p < 0.05), and for micronutrients both including (r = 0.47–0.94, all p < 0.05) and excluding (r = 0.40–0.85, all p < 0.05) supplements in the analysis. Bland-Altman plots confirmed acceptable agreement with no systematic bias. The DietBytes method demonstrated acceptable relative validity for assessment of nutrient intakes of pregnant women. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5295117 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-52951172017-02-10 Validation of a Smartphone Image-Based Dietary Assessment Method for Pregnant Women Ashman, Amy M. Collins, Clare E. Brown, Leanne J. Rae, Kym M. Rollo, Megan E. Nutrients Article Image-based dietary records could lower participant burden associated with traditional prospective methods of dietary assessment. They have been used in children, adolescents and adults, but have not been evaluated in pregnant women. The current study evaluated relative validity of the DietBytes image-based dietary assessment method for assessing energy and nutrient intakes. Pregnant women collected image-based dietary records (via a smartphone application) of all food, drinks and supplements consumed over three non-consecutive days. Intakes from the image-based method were compared to intakes collected from three 24-h recalls, taken on random days; once per week, in the weeks following the image-based record. Data were analyzed using nutrient analysis software. Agreement between methods was ascertained using Pearson correlations and Bland-Altman plots. Twenty-five women (27 recruited, one withdrew, one incomplete), median age 29 years, 15 primiparas, eight Aboriginal Australians, completed image-based records for analysis. Significant correlations between the two methods were observed for energy, macronutrients and fiber (r = 0.58–0.84, all p < 0.05), and for micronutrients both including (r = 0.47–0.94, all p < 0.05) and excluding (r = 0.40–0.85, all p < 0.05) supplements in the analysis. Bland-Altman plots confirmed acceptable agreement with no systematic bias. The DietBytes method demonstrated acceptable relative validity for assessment of nutrient intakes of pregnant women. MDPI 2017-01-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5295117/ /pubmed/28106758 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu9010073 Text en © 2017 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Ashman, Amy M. Collins, Clare E. Brown, Leanne J. Rae, Kym M. Rollo, Megan E. Validation of a Smartphone Image-Based Dietary Assessment Method for Pregnant Women |
title | Validation of a Smartphone Image-Based Dietary Assessment Method for Pregnant Women |
title_full | Validation of a Smartphone Image-Based Dietary Assessment Method for Pregnant Women |
title_fullStr | Validation of a Smartphone Image-Based Dietary Assessment Method for Pregnant Women |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation of a Smartphone Image-Based Dietary Assessment Method for Pregnant Women |
title_short | Validation of a Smartphone Image-Based Dietary Assessment Method for Pregnant Women |
title_sort | validation of a smartphone image-based dietary assessment method for pregnant women |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5295117/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28106758 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu9010073 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ashmanamym validationofasmartphoneimagebaseddietaryassessmentmethodforpregnantwomen AT collinsclaree validationofasmartphoneimagebaseddietaryassessmentmethodforpregnantwomen AT brownleannej validationofasmartphoneimagebaseddietaryassessmentmethodforpregnantwomen AT raekymm validationofasmartphoneimagebaseddietaryassessmentmethodforpregnantwomen AT rollomegane validationofasmartphoneimagebaseddietaryassessmentmethodforpregnantwomen |