Cargando…
Comparison of inhaled milrinone, nitric oxide and prostacyclin in acute respiratory distress syndrome
AIM: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of inhaled milrinone in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). METHODS: Open-label prospective cross-over pilot study where fifteen adult patients with hypoxemic failure meeting standard ARDS criteria and monitored with a pulmonary artery catheter were r...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5295172/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28224110 http://dx.doi.org/10.5492/wjccm.v6.i1.74 |
_version_ | 1782505380101750784 |
---|---|
author | Albert, Martin Corsilli, Daniel Williamson, David R Brosseau, Marc Bellemare, Patrick Delisle, Stéphane Nguyen, Anne QN Varin, France |
author_facet | Albert, Martin Corsilli, Daniel Williamson, David R Brosseau, Marc Bellemare, Patrick Delisle, Stéphane Nguyen, Anne QN Varin, France |
author_sort | Albert, Martin |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of inhaled milrinone in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). METHODS: Open-label prospective cross-over pilot study where fifteen adult patients with hypoxemic failure meeting standard ARDS criteria and monitored with a pulmonary artery catheter were recruited in an academic 24-bed medico-surgical intensive care unit. Random sequential administration of iNO (20 ppm) or nebulized epoprostenol (10 μg/mL) was done in all patients. Thereafter, inhaled milrinone (1 mg/mL) alone followed by inhaled milrinone in association with inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) was administered. A jet nebulization device synchronized with the mechanical ventilation was use to administrate the epoprostenol and the milrinone. Hemodynamic measurements and partial pressure of arterial oxygen (PaO(2)) were recorded before and after each inhaled therapy administration. RESULTS: The majority of ARDS were of pulmonary cause (n = 13) and pneumonia (n = 7) was the leading underlying initial disease. Other pulmonary causes of ARDS were: Post cardiopulmonary bypass (n = 2), smoke inhalation injury (n = 1), thoracic trauma and pulmonary contusions (n = 2) and aspiration (n = 1). Two patients had an extra pulmonary cause of ARDS: A polytrauma patient and an intra-abdominal abscess Inhaled nitric oxide, epoprostenol, inhaled milrinone and the combination of inhaled milrinone and iNO had no impact on systemic hemodynamics. No significant adverse events related to study medications were observed. The median increase of PaO(2) from baseline was 8.8 mmHg [interquartile range (IQR) = 16.3], 6.0 mmHg (IQR = 18.4), 6 mmHg (IQR = 15.8) and 9.2 mmHg (IQR = 20.2) respectively with iNO, epoprostenol, inhaled milrinone, and iNO added to milrinone. Only iNO and the combination of inhaled milrinone and iNO had a statistically significant effect on PaO(2). CONCLUSION: When comparing the effects of inhaled NO, milrinone and epoprostenol, only NO significantly improved oxygenation. Inhaled milrinone appeared safe but failed to improve oxygenation in ARDS. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5295172 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Baishideng Publishing Group Inc |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-52951722017-02-21 Comparison of inhaled milrinone, nitric oxide and prostacyclin in acute respiratory distress syndrome Albert, Martin Corsilli, Daniel Williamson, David R Brosseau, Marc Bellemare, Patrick Delisle, Stéphane Nguyen, Anne QN Varin, France World J Crit Care Med Prospective Study AIM: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of inhaled milrinone in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). METHODS: Open-label prospective cross-over pilot study where fifteen adult patients with hypoxemic failure meeting standard ARDS criteria and monitored with a pulmonary artery catheter were recruited in an academic 24-bed medico-surgical intensive care unit. Random sequential administration of iNO (20 ppm) or nebulized epoprostenol (10 μg/mL) was done in all patients. Thereafter, inhaled milrinone (1 mg/mL) alone followed by inhaled milrinone in association with inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) was administered. A jet nebulization device synchronized with the mechanical ventilation was use to administrate the epoprostenol and the milrinone. Hemodynamic measurements and partial pressure of arterial oxygen (PaO(2)) were recorded before and after each inhaled therapy administration. RESULTS: The majority of ARDS were of pulmonary cause (n = 13) and pneumonia (n = 7) was the leading underlying initial disease. Other pulmonary causes of ARDS were: Post cardiopulmonary bypass (n = 2), smoke inhalation injury (n = 1), thoracic trauma and pulmonary contusions (n = 2) and aspiration (n = 1). Two patients had an extra pulmonary cause of ARDS: A polytrauma patient and an intra-abdominal abscess Inhaled nitric oxide, epoprostenol, inhaled milrinone and the combination of inhaled milrinone and iNO had no impact on systemic hemodynamics. No significant adverse events related to study medications were observed. The median increase of PaO(2) from baseline was 8.8 mmHg [interquartile range (IQR) = 16.3], 6.0 mmHg (IQR = 18.4), 6 mmHg (IQR = 15.8) and 9.2 mmHg (IQR = 20.2) respectively with iNO, epoprostenol, inhaled milrinone, and iNO added to milrinone. Only iNO and the combination of inhaled milrinone and iNO had a statistically significant effect on PaO(2). CONCLUSION: When comparing the effects of inhaled NO, milrinone and epoprostenol, only NO significantly improved oxygenation. Inhaled milrinone appeared safe but failed to improve oxygenation in ARDS. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2017-02-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5295172/ /pubmed/28224110 http://dx.doi.org/10.5492/wjccm.v6.i1.74 Text en ©The Author(s) 2017. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. |
spellingShingle | Prospective Study Albert, Martin Corsilli, Daniel Williamson, David R Brosseau, Marc Bellemare, Patrick Delisle, Stéphane Nguyen, Anne QN Varin, France Comparison of inhaled milrinone, nitric oxide and prostacyclin in acute respiratory distress syndrome |
title | Comparison of inhaled milrinone, nitric oxide and prostacyclin in acute respiratory distress syndrome |
title_full | Comparison of inhaled milrinone, nitric oxide and prostacyclin in acute respiratory distress syndrome |
title_fullStr | Comparison of inhaled milrinone, nitric oxide and prostacyclin in acute respiratory distress syndrome |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of inhaled milrinone, nitric oxide and prostacyclin in acute respiratory distress syndrome |
title_short | Comparison of inhaled milrinone, nitric oxide and prostacyclin in acute respiratory distress syndrome |
title_sort | comparison of inhaled milrinone, nitric oxide and prostacyclin in acute respiratory distress syndrome |
topic | Prospective Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5295172/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28224110 http://dx.doi.org/10.5492/wjccm.v6.i1.74 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT albertmartin comparisonofinhaledmilrinonenitricoxideandprostacyclininacuterespiratorydistresssyndrome AT corsillidaniel comparisonofinhaledmilrinonenitricoxideandprostacyclininacuterespiratorydistresssyndrome AT williamsondavidr comparisonofinhaledmilrinonenitricoxideandprostacyclininacuterespiratorydistresssyndrome AT brosseaumarc comparisonofinhaledmilrinonenitricoxideandprostacyclininacuterespiratorydistresssyndrome AT bellemarepatrick comparisonofinhaledmilrinonenitricoxideandprostacyclininacuterespiratorydistresssyndrome AT delislestephane comparisonofinhaledmilrinonenitricoxideandprostacyclininacuterespiratorydistresssyndrome AT nguyenanneqn comparisonofinhaledmilrinonenitricoxideandprostacyclininacuterespiratorydistresssyndrome AT varinfrance comparisonofinhaledmilrinonenitricoxideandprostacyclininacuterespiratorydistresssyndrome |