Cargando…

Comparison of inhaled milrinone, nitric oxide and prostacyclin in acute respiratory distress syndrome

AIM: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of inhaled milrinone in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). METHODS: Open-label prospective cross-over pilot study where fifteen adult patients with hypoxemic failure meeting standard ARDS criteria and monitored with a pulmonary artery catheter were r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Albert, Martin, Corsilli, Daniel, Williamson, David R, Brosseau, Marc, Bellemare, Patrick, Delisle, Stéphane, Nguyen, Anne QN, Varin, France
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5295172/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28224110
http://dx.doi.org/10.5492/wjccm.v6.i1.74
_version_ 1782505380101750784
author Albert, Martin
Corsilli, Daniel
Williamson, David R
Brosseau, Marc
Bellemare, Patrick
Delisle, Stéphane
Nguyen, Anne QN
Varin, France
author_facet Albert, Martin
Corsilli, Daniel
Williamson, David R
Brosseau, Marc
Bellemare, Patrick
Delisle, Stéphane
Nguyen, Anne QN
Varin, France
author_sort Albert, Martin
collection PubMed
description AIM: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of inhaled milrinone in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). METHODS: Open-label prospective cross-over pilot study where fifteen adult patients with hypoxemic failure meeting standard ARDS criteria and monitored with a pulmonary artery catheter were recruited in an academic 24-bed medico-surgical intensive care unit. Random sequential administration of iNO (20 ppm) or nebulized epoprostenol (10 μg/mL) was done in all patients. Thereafter, inhaled milrinone (1 mg/mL) alone followed by inhaled milrinone in association with inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) was administered. A jet nebulization device synchronized with the mechanical ventilation was use to administrate the epoprostenol and the milrinone. Hemodynamic measurements and partial pressure of arterial oxygen (PaO(2)) were recorded before and after each inhaled therapy administration. RESULTS: The majority of ARDS were of pulmonary cause (n = 13) and pneumonia (n = 7) was the leading underlying initial disease. Other pulmonary causes of ARDS were: Post cardiopulmonary bypass (n = 2), smoke inhalation injury (n = 1), thoracic trauma and pulmonary contusions (n = 2) and aspiration (n = 1). Two patients had an extra pulmonary cause of ARDS: A polytrauma patient and an intra-abdominal abscess Inhaled nitric oxide, epoprostenol, inhaled milrinone and the combination of inhaled milrinone and iNO had no impact on systemic hemodynamics. No significant adverse events related to study medications were observed. The median increase of PaO(2) from baseline was 8.8 mmHg [interquartile range (IQR) = 16.3], 6.0 mmHg (IQR = 18.4), 6 mmHg (IQR = 15.8) and 9.2 mmHg (IQR = 20.2) respectively with iNO, epoprostenol, inhaled milrinone, and iNO added to milrinone. Only iNO and the combination of inhaled milrinone and iNO had a statistically significant effect on PaO(2). CONCLUSION: When comparing the effects of inhaled NO, milrinone and epoprostenol, only NO significantly improved oxygenation. Inhaled milrinone appeared safe but failed to improve oxygenation in ARDS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5295172
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52951722017-02-21 Comparison of inhaled milrinone, nitric oxide and prostacyclin in acute respiratory distress syndrome Albert, Martin Corsilli, Daniel Williamson, David R Brosseau, Marc Bellemare, Patrick Delisle, Stéphane Nguyen, Anne QN Varin, France World J Crit Care Med Prospective Study AIM: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of inhaled milrinone in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). METHODS: Open-label prospective cross-over pilot study where fifteen adult patients with hypoxemic failure meeting standard ARDS criteria and monitored with a pulmonary artery catheter were recruited in an academic 24-bed medico-surgical intensive care unit. Random sequential administration of iNO (20 ppm) or nebulized epoprostenol (10 μg/mL) was done in all patients. Thereafter, inhaled milrinone (1 mg/mL) alone followed by inhaled milrinone in association with inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) was administered. A jet nebulization device synchronized with the mechanical ventilation was use to administrate the epoprostenol and the milrinone. Hemodynamic measurements and partial pressure of arterial oxygen (PaO(2)) were recorded before and after each inhaled therapy administration. RESULTS: The majority of ARDS were of pulmonary cause (n = 13) and pneumonia (n = 7) was the leading underlying initial disease. Other pulmonary causes of ARDS were: Post cardiopulmonary bypass (n = 2), smoke inhalation injury (n = 1), thoracic trauma and pulmonary contusions (n = 2) and aspiration (n = 1). Two patients had an extra pulmonary cause of ARDS: A polytrauma patient and an intra-abdominal abscess Inhaled nitric oxide, epoprostenol, inhaled milrinone and the combination of inhaled milrinone and iNO had no impact on systemic hemodynamics. No significant adverse events related to study medications were observed. The median increase of PaO(2) from baseline was 8.8 mmHg [interquartile range (IQR) = 16.3], 6.0 mmHg (IQR = 18.4), 6 mmHg (IQR = 15.8) and 9.2 mmHg (IQR = 20.2) respectively with iNO, epoprostenol, inhaled milrinone, and iNO added to milrinone. Only iNO and the combination of inhaled milrinone and iNO had a statistically significant effect on PaO(2). CONCLUSION: When comparing the effects of inhaled NO, milrinone and epoprostenol, only NO significantly improved oxygenation. Inhaled milrinone appeared safe but failed to improve oxygenation in ARDS. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2017-02-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5295172/ /pubmed/28224110 http://dx.doi.org/10.5492/wjccm.v6.i1.74 Text en ©The Author(s) 2017. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial.
spellingShingle Prospective Study
Albert, Martin
Corsilli, Daniel
Williamson, David R
Brosseau, Marc
Bellemare, Patrick
Delisle, Stéphane
Nguyen, Anne QN
Varin, France
Comparison of inhaled milrinone, nitric oxide and prostacyclin in acute respiratory distress syndrome
title Comparison of inhaled milrinone, nitric oxide and prostacyclin in acute respiratory distress syndrome
title_full Comparison of inhaled milrinone, nitric oxide and prostacyclin in acute respiratory distress syndrome
title_fullStr Comparison of inhaled milrinone, nitric oxide and prostacyclin in acute respiratory distress syndrome
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of inhaled milrinone, nitric oxide and prostacyclin in acute respiratory distress syndrome
title_short Comparison of inhaled milrinone, nitric oxide and prostacyclin in acute respiratory distress syndrome
title_sort comparison of inhaled milrinone, nitric oxide and prostacyclin in acute respiratory distress syndrome
topic Prospective Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5295172/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28224110
http://dx.doi.org/10.5492/wjccm.v6.i1.74
work_keys_str_mv AT albertmartin comparisonofinhaledmilrinonenitricoxideandprostacyclininacuterespiratorydistresssyndrome
AT corsillidaniel comparisonofinhaledmilrinonenitricoxideandprostacyclininacuterespiratorydistresssyndrome
AT williamsondavidr comparisonofinhaledmilrinonenitricoxideandprostacyclininacuterespiratorydistresssyndrome
AT brosseaumarc comparisonofinhaledmilrinonenitricoxideandprostacyclininacuterespiratorydistresssyndrome
AT bellemarepatrick comparisonofinhaledmilrinonenitricoxideandprostacyclininacuterespiratorydistresssyndrome
AT delislestephane comparisonofinhaledmilrinonenitricoxideandprostacyclininacuterespiratorydistresssyndrome
AT nguyenanneqn comparisonofinhaledmilrinonenitricoxideandprostacyclininacuterespiratorydistresssyndrome
AT varinfrance comparisonofinhaledmilrinonenitricoxideandprostacyclininacuterespiratorydistresssyndrome