Cargando…
Comparison of Gastric versus Gastrointestinal PBET Extractions for Estimating Oral Bioaccessibility of Metals in House Dust
Oral bioaccessibility estimates for six metals which are prevalent as contaminants in Canada (zinc, lead, cadmium, copper, nickel, and chromium) are investigated for house dust using the simple gastric phase versus the two-phase physiologically-based extraction technique (PBET). The purpose is to de...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5295342/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28106788 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14010092 |
_version_ | 1782505417161572352 |
---|---|
author | Boros, Kristina Fortin, Danielle Jayawardene, Innocent Chénier, Marc Levesque, Christine Rasmussen, Pat E. |
author_facet | Boros, Kristina Fortin, Danielle Jayawardene, Innocent Chénier, Marc Levesque, Christine Rasmussen, Pat E. |
author_sort | Boros, Kristina |
collection | PubMed |
description | Oral bioaccessibility estimates for six metals which are prevalent as contaminants in Canada (zinc, lead, cadmium, copper, nickel, and chromium) are investigated for house dust using the simple gastric phase versus the two-phase physiologically-based extraction technique (PBET). The purpose is to determine whether a complete gastrointestinal (GI) assay yields a more conservative (i.e., higher) estimate of metal bioaccessibility in house dust than the gastric phase alone (G-alone). The study samples include household vacuum dust collected from 33 homes in Montreal, Canada, plus four certified reference materials (NIST 2583, NIST 2584, NIST 2710 and NIST 2710a). Results indicate that percent bioaccessibilities obtained using G-alone are generally greater than or equivalent to those obtained using the complete GI simulation for the six studied metals in house dust. Median bioaccessibilities for G-alone/GI in household vacuum dust samples (n = 33) are 76.9%/19.5% for zinc, 50.4%/6.2% for lead, 70.0%/22.4% for cadmium, 33.9%/30.5% for copper and 28.5%/20.7% for nickel. Bioaccessible chromium is above the detection limit in only four out of 33 samples, for which G-alone results are not significantly different from GI results (p = 0.39). It is concluded that, for the six studied metals, a simple G-alone extraction provides a conservative and cost-effective approach for estimating oral bioaccessibility of metals in house dust. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5295342 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-52953422017-02-07 Comparison of Gastric versus Gastrointestinal PBET Extractions for Estimating Oral Bioaccessibility of Metals in House Dust Boros, Kristina Fortin, Danielle Jayawardene, Innocent Chénier, Marc Levesque, Christine Rasmussen, Pat E. Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Oral bioaccessibility estimates for six metals which are prevalent as contaminants in Canada (zinc, lead, cadmium, copper, nickel, and chromium) are investigated for house dust using the simple gastric phase versus the two-phase physiologically-based extraction technique (PBET). The purpose is to determine whether a complete gastrointestinal (GI) assay yields a more conservative (i.e., higher) estimate of metal bioaccessibility in house dust than the gastric phase alone (G-alone). The study samples include household vacuum dust collected from 33 homes in Montreal, Canada, plus four certified reference materials (NIST 2583, NIST 2584, NIST 2710 and NIST 2710a). Results indicate that percent bioaccessibilities obtained using G-alone are generally greater than or equivalent to those obtained using the complete GI simulation for the six studied metals in house dust. Median bioaccessibilities for G-alone/GI in household vacuum dust samples (n = 33) are 76.9%/19.5% for zinc, 50.4%/6.2% for lead, 70.0%/22.4% for cadmium, 33.9%/30.5% for copper and 28.5%/20.7% for nickel. Bioaccessible chromium is above the detection limit in only four out of 33 samples, for which G-alone results are not significantly different from GI results (p = 0.39). It is concluded that, for the six studied metals, a simple G-alone extraction provides a conservative and cost-effective approach for estimating oral bioaccessibility of metals in house dust. MDPI 2017-01-18 2017-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5295342/ /pubmed/28106788 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14010092 Text en © 2017 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Boros, Kristina Fortin, Danielle Jayawardene, Innocent Chénier, Marc Levesque, Christine Rasmussen, Pat E. Comparison of Gastric versus Gastrointestinal PBET Extractions for Estimating Oral Bioaccessibility of Metals in House Dust |
title | Comparison of Gastric versus Gastrointestinal PBET Extractions for Estimating Oral Bioaccessibility of Metals in House Dust |
title_full | Comparison of Gastric versus Gastrointestinal PBET Extractions for Estimating Oral Bioaccessibility of Metals in House Dust |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Gastric versus Gastrointestinal PBET Extractions for Estimating Oral Bioaccessibility of Metals in House Dust |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Gastric versus Gastrointestinal PBET Extractions for Estimating Oral Bioaccessibility of Metals in House Dust |
title_short | Comparison of Gastric versus Gastrointestinal PBET Extractions for Estimating Oral Bioaccessibility of Metals in House Dust |
title_sort | comparison of gastric versus gastrointestinal pbet extractions for estimating oral bioaccessibility of metals in house dust |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5295342/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28106788 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14010092 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT boroskristina comparisonofgastricversusgastrointestinalpbetextractionsforestimatingoralbioaccessibilityofmetalsinhousedust AT fortindanielle comparisonofgastricversusgastrointestinalpbetextractionsforestimatingoralbioaccessibilityofmetalsinhousedust AT jayawardeneinnocent comparisonofgastricversusgastrointestinalpbetextractionsforestimatingoralbioaccessibilityofmetalsinhousedust AT cheniermarc comparisonofgastricversusgastrointestinalpbetextractionsforestimatingoralbioaccessibilityofmetalsinhousedust AT levesquechristine comparisonofgastricversusgastrointestinalpbetextractionsforestimatingoralbioaccessibilityofmetalsinhousedust AT rasmussenpate comparisonofgastricversusgastrointestinalpbetextractionsforestimatingoralbioaccessibilityofmetalsinhousedust |