Cargando…

Comparative study evaluating the efficiency of cooled and uncooled single-treatment MWA in thyroid nodules after a 3-month follow up

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the efficacy of single-treatment cooled and uncooled microwave ablation in thyroid nodules. METHODS: Eighteen patients (11 women) with an average age of 62 years (range: 41–80) with 18 cold, mainly solid or solid thyroid nodules were treat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mader, Oscar Maximilian, Tanha, Nadine Farivar, Mader, Alexander, Happel, Christian, Korkusuz, Yücel, Grünwald, Frank
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5295504/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28203621
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejro.2017.01.004
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the efficacy of single-treatment cooled and uncooled microwave ablation in thyroid nodules. METHODS: Eighteen patients (11 women) with an average age of 62 years (range: 41–80) with 18 cold, mainly solid or solid thyroid nodules were treated with cooled or uncooled microwave ablation. Pain during the treatment was measured on a 10-point score. Side effects revealed by ultrasound or patients’ complaints were documented. Laboratory data was evaluated before, 24 h and three months after MWA. Nodule volumes were measured before and three months after MWA. RESULTS: Cooled MWA was better tolerated than uncooled MWA. A significant reduction of thyroid nodule volume was observed in all cases. The reduction after cMWA was higher (40%) than after uMWA (29%). Pain intensity during cMWA was significantly lower than after uMWA. CMWA and uMWA led to a significant decrease of nodule blood circulation and echogenicity and to a significant increase of nodule elasticity. Thyroid function remained intact in all cases. The energy (kJ/s) administered into the nodules in relation to the ablation time during cMWA was higher than during uMWA. CONCLUSIONS: CMWA leads to a slightly higher but statistically not significant nodule volume reduction than uMWA. Patient comfort during cMWA is higher than during uMWA. The risk of unintended side effects is less in cMWA. A Single-treatment provides sufficient results.