Cargando…
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Safety of Methotrexate and Its Possible Benefits on Restenosis After Bare-Metal Stent Deployment
BACKGROUND: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) revolutionized treatment of coronary artery disease. Drug-eluting stents are effective and safe but their cost is high, especially for some countries. The primary objective was to evaluate the safety of methotrexate (MTX) in patients who underwent...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elmer Press
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5295516/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28197276 http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/cr468w |
_version_ | 1782505451075665920 |
---|---|
author | Gouveia, Viviane Oliveira, Dinaldo C. Tenorio, Emmanuele Brito, Norma Sarinho, Emanuel |
author_facet | Gouveia, Viviane Oliveira, Dinaldo C. Tenorio, Emmanuele Brito, Norma Sarinho, Emanuel |
author_sort | Gouveia, Viviane |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) revolutionized treatment of coronary artery disease. Drug-eluting stents are effective and safe but their cost is high, especially for some countries. The primary objective was to evaluate the safety of methotrexate (MTX) in patients who underwent PCI and the secondary goal was to evaluate the possibility that MTX has an impact on restenosis. METHODS: This was a transversal, prospective and descriptive study that recruited 16 patients in whom PCI was planned. MTX was administered to patients at a dose of 5 mg/week for 2 weeks before PCI and 8 weeks after PCI. Bare-metal stent (BMS) deployment was performed according to standard practice. Patients were monitored clinically every 15 days during the first 2 months after the procedure and monthly until 9 months after PCI. RESULTS: There were no immediate or late complications associated with PCI. Adverse events and side effects due to MTX occurred in three patients (prevalence 18.7%). These side effects are classified as minor complications. MTX was not discontinued due to these side effects. There were no reported cases of clinical restenosis. CONCLUSIONS: MTX was safe in the study population and raised the possibility that a low-cost drug may have positive effects on restenosis after BMS implantation. However, studies with larger sample sizes and other imagine modalities (intravascular ultrasound and/or optical coherence tomography) are required to confirm this hypothesis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5295516 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Elmer Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-52955162017-02-14 Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Safety of Methotrexate and Its Possible Benefits on Restenosis After Bare-Metal Stent Deployment Gouveia, Viviane Oliveira, Dinaldo C. Tenorio, Emmanuele Brito, Norma Sarinho, Emanuel Cardiol Res Original Article BACKGROUND: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) revolutionized treatment of coronary artery disease. Drug-eluting stents are effective and safe but their cost is high, especially for some countries. The primary objective was to evaluate the safety of methotrexate (MTX) in patients who underwent PCI and the secondary goal was to evaluate the possibility that MTX has an impact on restenosis. METHODS: This was a transversal, prospective and descriptive study that recruited 16 patients in whom PCI was planned. MTX was administered to patients at a dose of 5 mg/week for 2 weeks before PCI and 8 weeks after PCI. Bare-metal stent (BMS) deployment was performed according to standard practice. Patients were monitored clinically every 15 days during the first 2 months after the procedure and monthly until 9 months after PCI. RESULTS: There were no immediate or late complications associated with PCI. Adverse events and side effects due to MTX occurred in three patients (prevalence 18.7%). These side effects are classified as minor complications. MTX was not discontinued due to these side effects. There were no reported cases of clinical restenosis. CONCLUSIONS: MTX was safe in the study population and raised the possibility that a low-cost drug may have positive effects on restenosis after BMS implantation. However, studies with larger sample sizes and other imagine modalities (intravascular ultrasound and/or optical coherence tomography) are required to confirm this hypothesis. Elmer Press 2016-06 2016-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5295516/ /pubmed/28197276 http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/cr468w Text en Copyright 2016, Gouveia et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Gouveia, Viviane Oliveira, Dinaldo C. Tenorio, Emmanuele Brito, Norma Sarinho, Emanuel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Safety of Methotrexate and Its Possible Benefits on Restenosis After Bare-Metal Stent Deployment |
title | Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Safety of Methotrexate and Its Possible Benefits on Restenosis After Bare-Metal Stent Deployment |
title_full | Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Safety of Methotrexate and Its Possible Benefits on Restenosis After Bare-Metal Stent Deployment |
title_fullStr | Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Safety of Methotrexate and Its Possible Benefits on Restenosis After Bare-Metal Stent Deployment |
title_full_unstemmed | Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Safety of Methotrexate and Its Possible Benefits on Restenosis After Bare-Metal Stent Deployment |
title_short | Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Safety of Methotrexate and Its Possible Benefits on Restenosis After Bare-Metal Stent Deployment |
title_sort | percutaneous coronary intervention: safety of methotrexate and its possible benefits on restenosis after bare-metal stent deployment |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5295516/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28197276 http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/cr468w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gouveiaviviane percutaneouscoronaryinterventionsafetyofmethotrexateanditspossiblebenefitsonrestenosisafterbaremetalstentdeployment AT oliveiradinaldoc percutaneouscoronaryinterventionsafetyofmethotrexateanditspossiblebenefitsonrestenosisafterbaremetalstentdeployment AT tenorioemmanuele percutaneouscoronaryinterventionsafetyofmethotrexateanditspossiblebenefitsonrestenosisafterbaremetalstentdeployment AT britonorma percutaneouscoronaryinterventionsafetyofmethotrexateanditspossiblebenefitsonrestenosisafterbaremetalstentdeployment AT sarinhoemanuel percutaneouscoronaryinterventionsafetyofmethotrexateanditspossiblebenefitsonrestenosisafterbaremetalstentdeployment |