Cargando…

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Safety of Methotrexate and Its Possible Benefits on Restenosis After Bare-Metal Stent Deployment

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) revolutionized treatment of coronary artery disease. Drug-eluting stents are effective and safe but their cost is high, especially for some countries. The primary objective was to evaluate the safety of methotrexate (MTX) in patients who underwent...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gouveia, Viviane, Oliveira, Dinaldo C., Tenorio, Emmanuele, Brito, Norma, Sarinho, Emanuel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elmer Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5295516/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28197276
http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/cr468w
_version_ 1782505451075665920
author Gouveia, Viviane
Oliveira, Dinaldo C.
Tenorio, Emmanuele
Brito, Norma
Sarinho, Emanuel
author_facet Gouveia, Viviane
Oliveira, Dinaldo C.
Tenorio, Emmanuele
Brito, Norma
Sarinho, Emanuel
author_sort Gouveia, Viviane
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) revolutionized treatment of coronary artery disease. Drug-eluting stents are effective and safe but their cost is high, especially for some countries. The primary objective was to evaluate the safety of methotrexate (MTX) in patients who underwent PCI and the secondary goal was to evaluate the possibility that MTX has an impact on restenosis. METHODS: This was a transversal, prospective and descriptive study that recruited 16 patients in whom PCI was planned. MTX was administered to patients at a dose of 5 mg/week for 2 weeks before PCI and 8 weeks after PCI. Bare-metal stent (BMS) deployment was performed according to standard practice. Patients were monitored clinically every 15 days during the first 2 months after the procedure and monthly until 9 months after PCI. RESULTS: There were no immediate or late complications associated with PCI. Adverse events and side effects due to MTX occurred in three patients (prevalence 18.7%). These side effects are classified as minor complications. MTX was not discontinued due to these side effects. There were no reported cases of clinical restenosis. CONCLUSIONS: MTX was safe in the study population and raised the possibility that a low-cost drug may have positive effects on restenosis after BMS implantation. However, studies with larger sample sizes and other imagine modalities (intravascular ultrasound and/or optical coherence tomography) are required to confirm this hypothesis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5295516
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Elmer Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52955162017-02-14 Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Safety of Methotrexate and Its Possible Benefits on Restenosis After Bare-Metal Stent Deployment Gouveia, Viviane Oliveira, Dinaldo C. Tenorio, Emmanuele Brito, Norma Sarinho, Emanuel Cardiol Res Original Article BACKGROUND: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) revolutionized treatment of coronary artery disease. Drug-eluting stents are effective and safe but their cost is high, especially for some countries. The primary objective was to evaluate the safety of methotrexate (MTX) in patients who underwent PCI and the secondary goal was to evaluate the possibility that MTX has an impact on restenosis. METHODS: This was a transversal, prospective and descriptive study that recruited 16 patients in whom PCI was planned. MTX was administered to patients at a dose of 5 mg/week for 2 weeks before PCI and 8 weeks after PCI. Bare-metal stent (BMS) deployment was performed according to standard practice. Patients were monitored clinically every 15 days during the first 2 months after the procedure and monthly until 9 months after PCI. RESULTS: There were no immediate or late complications associated with PCI. Adverse events and side effects due to MTX occurred in three patients (prevalence 18.7%). These side effects are classified as minor complications. MTX was not discontinued due to these side effects. There were no reported cases of clinical restenosis. CONCLUSIONS: MTX was safe in the study population and raised the possibility that a low-cost drug may have positive effects on restenosis after BMS implantation. However, studies with larger sample sizes and other imagine modalities (intravascular ultrasound and/or optical coherence tomography) are required to confirm this hypothesis. Elmer Press 2016-06 2016-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5295516/ /pubmed/28197276 http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/cr468w Text en Copyright 2016, Gouveia et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Gouveia, Viviane
Oliveira, Dinaldo C.
Tenorio, Emmanuele
Brito, Norma
Sarinho, Emanuel
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Safety of Methotrexate and Its Possible Benefits on Restenosis After Bare-Metal Stent Deployment
title Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Safety of Methotrexate and Its Possible Benefits on Restenosis After Bare-Metal Stent Deployment
title_full Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Safety of Methotrexate and Its Possible Benefits on Restenosis After Bare-Metal Stent Deployment
title_fullStr Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Safety of Methotrexate and Its Possible Benefits on Restenosis After Bare-Metal Stent Deployment
title_full_unstemmed Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Safety of Methotrexate and Its Possible Benefits on Restenosis After Bare-Metal Stent Deployment
title_short Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Safety of Methotrexate and Its Possible Benefits on Restenosis After Bare-Metal Stent Deployment
title_sort percutaneous coronary intervention: safety of methotrexate and its possible benefits on restenosis after bare-metal stent deployment
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5295516/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28197276
http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/cr468w
work_keys_str_mv AT gouveiaviviane percutaneouscoronaryinterventionsafetyofmethotrexateanditspossiblebenefitsonrestenosisafterbaremetalstentdeployment
AT oliveiradinaldoc percutaneouscoronaryinterventionsafetyofmethotrexateanditspossiblebenefitsonrestenosisafterbaremetalstentdeployment
AT tenorioemmanuele percutaneouscoronaryinterventionsafetyofmethotrexateanditspossiblebenefitsonrestenosisafterbaremetalstentdeployment
AT britonorma percutaneouscoronaryinterventionsafetyofmethotrexateanditspossiblebenefitsonrestenosisafterbaremetalstentdeployment
AT sarinhoemanuel percutaneouscoronaryinterventionsafetyofmethotrexateanditspossiblebenefitsonrestenosisafterbaremetalstentdeployment