Cargando…
Is Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump Counterpulsation Sufficient to Treat Patients in Cardiogenic Shock, Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
BACKGROUND: A high number of patients do not survive primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) complicated by cardiogenic shock (CS), even when assisted with intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) counterpulsation. There is no accepted consensus on who may most benefit from IABP counterpulsation, a...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elmer Press
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5295547/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28197255 http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/cr415w |
_version_ | 1782505457684840448 |
---|---|
author | Paton, Maria Ashton, Lisa Pearson, Ian Sivananthan, Mohan |
author_facet | Paton, Maria Ashton, Lisa Pearson, Ian Sivananthan, Mohan |
author_sort | Paton, Maria |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: A high number of patients do not survive primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) complicated by cardiogenic shock (CS), even when assisted with intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) counterpulsation. There is no accepted consensus on who may most benefit from IABP counterpulsation, although previous retrospective studies have reported predictors of survival for patients undergoing PCI and cardiac surgery. To date, a risk model for emergency primary PCI patients has not been ascertained. The objective of this study was to identify independent predictors for in-hospital survival, to create a standardized risk model to predict patients who may require IABP insertion during primary PCI. METHOD: Retrospective data were from 165 patients who had undergone primary PCI with IABP due to CS complicating acute myocardial infarction (AMI), from September 2007 to 2010, and underwent logistic regression analysis, to evaluate the incremental risk factors associated with survival. RESULTS: The overall in-hospital mortality was 32.1% (53 patients). The incremental independent predictors for in-hospital survival were: patient age of less than 60 years (OR: 0.303, 95% CI: 0.11 - 0.83, P < 0.02) and the use of IABP support alone, as opposed to in adjunction with inotropic support (OR: 3.177, 95% CI: 1.159 - 8.708, P < 0.025). CONCLUSION: This study illustrated an age of less than 60 years, and the use of IABP alone, to be independent predictors of in-hospital survival in patients with CS complicating AMI who undergo primary PCI assisted by IABP. No specific risk model could be determined. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5295547 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Elmer Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-52955472017-02-14 Is Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump Counterpulsation Sufficient to Treat Patients in Cardiogenic Shock, Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Paton, Maria Ashton, Lisa Pearson, Ian Sivananthan, Mohan Cardiol Res Original Article BACKGROUND: A high number of patients do not survive primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) complicated by cardiogenic shock (CS), even when assisted with intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) counterpulsation. There is no accepted consensus on who may most benefit from IABP counterpulsation, although previous retrospective studies have reported predictors of survival for patients undergoing PCI and cardiac surgery. To date, a risk model for emergency primary PCI patients has not been ascertained. The objective of this study was to identify independent predictors for in-hospital survival, to create a standardized risk model to predict patients who may require IABP insertion during primary PCI. METHOD: Retrospective data were from 165 patients who had undergone primary PCI with IABP due to CS complicating acute myocardial infarction (AMI), from September 2007 to 2010, and underwent logistic regression analysis, to evaluate the incremental risk factors associated with survival. RESULTS: The overall in-hospital mortality was 32.1% (53 patients). The incremental independent predictors for in-hospital survival were: patient age of less than 60 years (OR: 0.303, 95% CI: 0.11 - 0.83, P < 0.02) and the use of IABP support alone, as opposed to in adjunction with inotropic support (OR: 3.177, 95% CI: 1.159 - 8.708, P < 0.025). CONCLUSION: This study illustrated an age of less than 60 years, and the use of IABP alone, to be independent predictors of in-hospital survival in patients with CS complicating AMI who undergo primary PCI assisted by IABP. No specific risk model could be determined. Elmer Press 2015-12 2015-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5295547/ /pubmed/28197255 http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/cr415w Text en Copyright 2015, Paton et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Paton, Maria Ashton, Lisa Pearson, Ian Sivananthan, Mohan Is Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump Counterpulsation Sufficient to Treat Patients in Cardiogenic Shock, Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention |
title | Is Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump Counterpulsation Sufficient to Treat Patients in Cardiogenic Shock, Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention |
title_full | Is Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump Counterpulsation Sufficient to Treat Patients in Cardiogenic Shock, Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention |
title_fullStr | Is Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump Counterpulsation Sufficient to Treat Patients in Cardiogenic Shock, Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention |
title_full_unstemmed | Is Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump Counterpulsation Sufficient to Treat Patients in Cardiogenic Shock, Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention |
title_short | Is Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump Counterpulsation Sufficient to Treat Patients in Cardiogenic Shock, Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention |
title_sort | is intra-aortic balloon pump counterpulsation sufficient to treat patients in cardiogenic shock, undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5295547/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28197255 http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/cr415w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT patonmaria isintraaorticballoonpumpcounterpulsationsufficienttotreatpatientsincardiogenicshockundergoingprimarypercutaneouscoronaryintervention AT ashtonlisa isintraaorticballoonpumpcounterpulsationsufficienttotreatpatientsincardiogenicshockundergoingprimarypercutaneouscoronaryintervention AT pearsonian isintraaorticballoonpumpcounterpulsationsufficienttotreatpatientsincardiogenicshockundergoingprimarypercutaneouscoronaryintervention AT sivananthanmohan isintraaorticballoonpumpcounterpulsationsufficienttotreatpatientsincardiogenicshockundergoingprimarypercutaneouscoronaryintervention |