Cargando…
A retrospective study of transfusion practices in a Tertiary Care Institute
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Excessive requests for cross matching blood which is more than the blood required for transfusion are usually based on worst case assumptions leading to overestimation of blood usage. We investigated the blood ordering pattern and transfusion practices so as to incorporate a blo...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5296802/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28216700 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.198395 |
_version_ | 1782505625691881472 |
---|---|
author | Raghuwanshi, Babita Pehlajani, NK Sinha, Mithilesh K Tripathy, Swagata |
author_facet | Raghuwanshi, Babita Pehlajani, NK Sinha, Mithilesh K Tripathy, Swagata |
author_sort | Raghuwanshi, Babita |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Excessive requests for cross matching blood which is more than the blood required for transfusion are usually based on worst case assumptions leading to overestimation of blood usage. We investigated the blood ordering pattern and transfusion practices so as to incorporate a blood ordering schedule for streamlining the use of blood in various hospital departments. METHODS: The study was conducted over a period of 19 months in a 350 bedded tertiary teaching hospital. Source of data was blood bank requisition forms and blood bank registers of patients who underwent elective or emergency procedures in the hospital, for which blood was ordered. Data were entered in MS Excel and analysed using SPSS version 20. RESULTS: The blood bank was requested to prepare 10,594 units of blood for 2556 patients. The blood utilised was 16.04% of total cross matched blood, leaving 83.9% of units cross matched but not transfused to patient for whom it was prepared, i.e., wasted. The surgery department had the highest number of units cross matched and transfused. The least number of units cross matched and wasted due to non-transfusion were from the Department of Oncology. CONCLUSION: The current deficiency of explicit maximum blood order schedule in our hospital is the major factor responsible for high cross match: transfusion ratio. Therefore, a maximal surgical blood order schedule has been suggested to the hospital transfusion committee to implement maximum surgical blood order schedules for selected procedures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5296802 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-52968022017-02-17 A retrospective study of transfusion practices in a Tertiary Care Institute Raghuwanshi, Babita Pehlajani, NK Sinha, Mithilesh K Tripathy, Swagata Indian J Anaesth Original Article BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Excessive requests for cross matching blood which is more than the blood required for transfusion are usually based on worst case assumptions leading to overestimation of blood usage. We investigated the blood ordering pattern and transfusion practices so as to incorporate a blood ordering schedule for streamlining the use of blood in various hospital departments. METHODS: The study was conducted over a period of 19 months in a 350 bedded tertiary teaching hospital. Source of data was blood bank requisition forms and blood bank registers of patients who underwent elective or emergency procedures in the hospital, for which blood was ordered. Data were entered in MS Excel and analysed using SPSS version 20. RESULTS: The blood bank was requested to prepare 10,594 units of blood for 2556 patients. The blood utilised was 16.04% of total cross matched blood, leaving 83.9% of units cross matched but not transfused to patient for whom it was prepared, i.e., wasted. The surgery department had the highest number of units cross matched and transfused. The least number of units cross matched and wasted due to non-transfusion were from the Department of Oncology. CONCLUSION: The current deficiency of explicit maximum blood order schedule in our hospital is the major factor responsible for high cross match: transfusion ratio. Therefore, a maximal surgical blood order schedule has been suggested to the hospital transfusion committee to implement maximum surgical blood order schedules for selected procedures. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5296802/ /pubmed/28216700 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.198395 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Anaesthesia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Raghuwanshi, Babita Pehlajani, NK Sinha, Mithilesh K Tripathy, Swagata A retrospective study of transfusion practices in a Tertiary Care Institute |
title | A retrospective study of transfusion practices in a Tertiary Care Institute |
title_full | A retrospective study of transfusion practices in a Tertiary Care Institute |
title_fullStr | A retrospective study of transfusion practices in a Tertiary Care Institute |
title_full_unstemmed | A retrospective study of transfusion practices in a Tertiary Care Institute |
title_short | A retrospective study of transfusion practices in a Tertiary Care Institute |
title_sort | retrospective study of transfusion practices in a tertiary care institute |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5296802/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28216700 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.198395 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT raghuwanshibabita aretrospectivestudyoftransfusionpracticesinatertiarycareinstitute AT pehlajanink aretrospectivestudyoftransfusionpracticesinatertiarycareinstitute AT sinhamithileshk aretrospectivestudyoftransfusionpracticesinatertiarycareinstitute AT tripathyswagata aretrospectivestudyoftransfusionpracticesinatertiarycareinstitute AT raghuwanshibabita retrospectivestudyoftransfusionpracticesinatertiarycareinstitute AT pehlajanink retrospectivestudyoftransfusionpracticesinatertiarycareinstitute AT sinhamithileshk retrospectivestudyoftransfusionpracticesinatertiarycareinstitute AT tripathyswagata retrospectivestudyoftransfusionpracticesinatertiarycareinstitute |