Cargando…

Molecular stool testing as an alternative for surveillance colonoscopy: a cross-sectional cohort study

BACKGROUND: As in many other European countries, a nationwide screening program for colorectal cancer (CRC) has recently been introduced in the Netherlands. As a side effect, such a screening program will inherently yield an increase in the demand for surveillance after removal of polyps/adenomas or...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Lanschot, Meta C. J., Carvalho, Beatriz, Coupé, Veerle M. H., van Engeland, Manon, Dekker, Evelien, Meijer, Gerrit A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5297018/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28173852
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3078-y
_version_ 1782505661919133696
author van Lanschot, Meta C. J.
Carvalho, Beatriz
Coupé, Veerle M. H.
van Engeland, Manon
Dekker, Evelien
Meijer, Gerrit A.
author_facet van Lanschot, Meta C. J.
Carvalho, Beatriz
Coupé, Veerle M. H.
van Engeland, Manon
Dekker, Evelien
Meijer, Gerrit A.
author_sort van Lanschot, Meta C. J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: As in many other European countries, a nationwide screening program for colorectal cancer (CRC) has recently been introduced in the Netherlands. As a side effect, such a screening program will inherently yield an increase in the demand for surveillance after removal of polyps/adenomas or CRC. Although these patients are at increased risk of metachronous colorectal neoplasia, solid evidence on CRC-related mortality reduction as a result of colonoscopy-based surveillance programs is lacking. Furthermore, colonoscopy-based surveillance leads to high patient burden, high logistic demands and high costs. Therefore, new surveillance strategies are needed. The aim of the present study, named Molecular stool testing for Colorectal CAncer Surveillance (MOCCAS), is to determine the performance characteristics of two established non-invasive tests, i.e., the multitarget stool DNA test Cologuard® and the faecal immunochemical test (FIT) in the detection of CRC and advanced adenomas as an alternative for colonoscopy surveillance. METHODS: In this observational cross-sectional cohort study, subjects aged 50 to 75 years will be approached to collect (whole-) stool samples for molecular testing and a FIT prior to their scheduled surveillance colonoscopy. The results of the tests will allow calculation of test sensitivities and specificities in the context of surveillance. This will provide the required input for the Dutch ASCCA model (Adenoma and Serrated pathway to Colorectal CAncer) to simulate surveillance strategies differing in frequency and duration. The model will allow predictions of lifetime health effects and costs. Multiple centres in the Netherlands will participate in the study that aims to include 4,000 individuals. DISCUSSION: The outcome of this study will inform on the (cost-) effectiveness of stool based molecular testing as an alternative for colonoscopy in the rapidly expanding surveillance population. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (https://clinicaltrials.gov/): NCT02715141. Retrospectively registered 17 February 2016.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5297018
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52970182017-02-10 Molecular stool testing as an alternative for surveillance colonoscopy: a cross-sectional cohort study van Lanschot, Meta C. J. Carvalho, Beatriz Coupé, Veerle M. H. van Engeland, Manon Dekker, Evelien Meijer, Gerrit A. BMC Cancer Study Protocol BACKGROUND: As in many other European countries, a nationwide screening program for colorectal cancer (CRC) has recently been introduced in the Netherlands. As a side effect, such a screening program will inherently yield an increase in the demand for surveillance after removal of polyps/adenomas or CRC. Although these patients are at increased risk of metachronous colorectal neoplasia, solid evidence on CRC-related mortality reduction as a result of colonoscopy-based surveillance programs is lacking. Furthermore, colonoscopy-based surveillance leads to high patient burden, high logistic demands and high costs. Therefore, new surveillance strategies are needed. The aim of the present study, named Molecular stool testing for Colorectal CAncer Surveillance (MOCCAS), is to determine the performance characteristics of two established non-invasive tests, i.e., the multitarget stool DNA test Cologuard® and the faecal immunochemical test (FIT) in the detection of CRC and advanced adenomas as an alternative for colonoscopy surveillance. METHODS: In this observational cross-sectional cohort study, subjects aged 50 to 75 years will be approached to collect (whole-) stool samples for molecular testing and a FIT prior to their scheduled surveillance colonoscopy. The results of the tests will allow calculation of test sensitivities and specificities in the context of surveillance. This will provide the required input for the Dutch ASCCA model (Adenoma and Serrated pathway to Colorectal CAncer) to simulate surveillance strategies differing in frequency and duration. The model will allow predictions of lifetime health effects and costs. Multiple centres in the Netherlands will participate in the study that aims to include 4,000 individuals. DISCUSSION: The outcome of this study will inform on the (cost-) effectiveness of stool based molecular testing as an alternative for colonoscopy in the rapidly expanding surveillance population. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (https://clinicaltrials.gov/): NCT02715141. Retrospectively registered 17 February 2016. BioMed Central 2017-02-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5297018/ /pubmed/28173852 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3078-y Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
van Lanschot, Meta C. J.
Carvalho, Beatriz
Coupé, Veerle M. H.
van Engeland, Manon
Dekker, Evelien
Meijer, Gerrit A.
Molecular stool testing as an alternative for surveillance colonoscopy: a cross-sectional cohort study
title Molecular stool testing as an alternative for surveillance colonoscopy: a cross-sectional cohort study
title_full Molecular stool testing as an alternative for surveillance colonoscopy: a cross-sectional cohort study
title_fullStr Molecular stool testing as an alternative for surveillance colonoscopy: a cross-sectional cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Molecular stool testing as an alternative for surveillance colonoscopy: a cross-sectional cohort study
title_short Molecular stool testing as an alternative for surveillance colonoscopy: a cross-sectional cohort study
title_sort molecular stool testing as an alternative for surveillance colonoscopy: a cross-sectional cohort study
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5297018/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28173852
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3078-y
work_keys_str_mv AT vanlanschotmetacj molecularstooltestingasanalternativeforsurveillancecolonoscopyacrosssectionalcohortstudy
AT carvalhobeatriz molecularstooltestingasanalternativeforsurveillancecolonoscopyacrosssectionalcohortstudy
AT coupeveerlemh molecularstooltestingasanalternativeforsurveillancecolonoscopyacrosssectionalcohortstudy
AT vanengelandmanon molecularstooltestingasanalternativeforsurveillancecolonoscopyacrosssectionalcohortstudy
AT dekkerevelien molecularstooltestingasanalternativeforsurveillancecolonoscopyacrosssectionalcohortstudy
AT meijergerrita molecularstooltestingasanalternativeforsurveillancecolonoscopyacrosssectionalcohortstudy