Cargando…
Staff experiences of closing out a clinical trial involving withdrawal of treatment: qualitative study
BACKGROUND: The ending of a clinical trial may be challenging, particularly if staff are required to withdraw the investigated treatment(s); however, this aspect of trial work is surprisingly under-researched. To address this gap, we explored the experiences of staff involved in closing out a trial...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5297163/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28173843 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-1813-y |
_version_ | 1782505690197131264 |
---|---|
author | Lawton, Julia White, David Rankin, David Elliott, Jackie Taylor, Carolin Cooper, Cindy Heller, Simon Hallowell, Nina |
author_facet | Lawton, Julia White, David Rankin, David Elliott, Jackie Taylor, Carolin Cooper, Cindy Heller, Simon Hallowell, Nina |
author_sort | Lawton, Julia |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The ending of a clinical trial may be challenging, particularly if staff are required to withdraw the investigated treatment(s); however, this aspect of trial work is surprisingly under-researched. To address this gap, we explored the experiences of staff involved in closing out a trial that entailed withdrawal of treatment (insulin pumps) from some patients. METHODS: Interviews were conducted with n = 22 staff, recruited from seven trial sites. Data were analysed thematically. RESULTS: Staff described a myriad of ethical and emotional challenges at closeout, many of which had been unforeseen when the trial began. A key challenge for staff was that, while patients gave their agreement to participate on the understanding that pump treatment could be withdrawn, they often found themselves benefitting from this regimen in ways they could not have foreseen. Hence, as the trial progressed, patients became increasingly anxious about withdrawal of treatment. This situation forced staff to consider whether the consent patients had given at the outset remained valid; it also presented them with a dilemma at closeout because many of those who had wanted to remain on a pump did not meet the clinical criteria required for post-trial funding. When deciding whether to withdraw treatment, staff not only had to take funding pressures and patient distress into account, but they also found themselves caught between an ethic of Hippocratic individualism and one of utilitarianism. These conflicting pressures and ethical considerations resulted in staff decision-making varying across the sites, an issue that some described as a further source of ethical unease. Staff concluded that, had there been more advanced planning and discussion, and greater accountability to an ethics committee, some of the challenges they had confronted at closeout could have been lessened or even prevented. CONCLUSIONS: The same kinds of ethical issues that may vex staff at the beginning of a trial (e.g. patients having unrealistic expectations of trial participation; staff experiencing conflicts between research and clinical roles) may re-present themselves at the end. To safeguard the wellbeing of staff and patients, greater planning, coordination and ethical oversight should go into the closeout of trials involving withdrawal of treatment(s). TRIAL REGISTRATION: International Standard Randomised Controlled Trials Number (ISRCTN) Registry, ISRCTN61215213. Registered on 11 May 2011 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-017-1813-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5297163 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-52971632017-02-10 Staff experiences of closing out a clinical trial involving withdrawal of treatment: qualitative study Lawton, Julia White, David Rankin, David Elliott, Jackie Taylor, Carolin Cooper, Cindy Heller, Simon Hallowell, Nina Trials Research BACKGROUND: The ending of a clinical trial may be challenging, particularly if staff are required to withdraw the investigated treatment(s); however, this aspect of trial work is surprisingly under-researched. To address this gap, we explored the experiences of staff involved in closing out a trial that entailed withdrawal of treatment (insulin pumps) from some patients. METHODS: Interviews were conducted with n = 22 staff, recruited from seven trial sites. Data were analysed thematically. RESULTS: Staff described a myriad of ethical and emotional challenges at closeout, many of which had been unforeseen when the trial began. A key challenge for staff was that, while patients gave their agreement to participate on the understanding that pump treatment could be withdrawn, they often found themselves benefitting from this regimen in ways they could not have foreseen. Hence, as the trial progressed, patients became increasingly anxious about withdrawal of treatment. This situation forced staff to consider whether the consent patients had given at the outset remained valid; it also presented them with a dilemma at closeout because many of those who had wanted to remain on a pump did not meet the clinical criteria required for post-trial funding. When deciding whether to withdraw treatment, staff not only had to take funding pressures and patient distress into account, but they also found themselves caught between an ethic of Hippocratic individualism and one of utilitarianism. These conflicting pressures and ethical considerations resulted in staff decision-making varying across the sites, an issue that some described as a further source of ethical unease. Staff concluded that, had there been more advanced planning and discussion, and greater accountability to an ethics committee, some of the challenges they had confronted at closeout could have been lessened or even prevented. CONCLUSIONS: The same kinds of ethical issues that may vex staff at the beginning of a trial (e.g. patients having unrealistic expectations of trial participation; staff experiencing conflicts between research and clinical roles) may re-present themselves at the end. To safeguard the wellbeing of staff and patients, greater planning, coordination and ethical oversight should go into the closeout of trials involving withdrawal of treatment(s). TRIAL REGISTRATION: International Standard Randomised Controlled Trials Number (ISRCTN) Registry, ISRCTN61215213. Registered on 11 May 2011 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-017-1813-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-02-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5297163/ /pubmed/28173843 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-1813-y Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Lawton, Julia White, David Rankin, David Elliott, Jackie Taylor, Carolin Cooper, Cindy Heller, Simon Hallowell, Nina Staff experiences of closing out a clinical trial involving withdrawal of treatment: qualitative study |
title | Staff experiences of closing out a clinical trial involving withdrawal of treatment: qualitative study |
title_full | Staff experiences of closing out a clinical trial involving withdrawal of treatment: qualitative study |
title_fullStr | Staff experiences of closing out a clinical trial involving withdrawal of treatment: qualitative study |
title_full_unstemmed | Staff experiences of closing out a clinical trial involving withdrawal of treatment: qualitative study |
title_short | Staff experiences of closing out a clinical trial involving withdrawal of treatment: qualitative study |
title_sort | staff experiences of closing out a clinical trial involving withdrawal of treatment: qualitative study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5297163/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28173843 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-1813-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lawtonjulia staffexperiencesofclosingoutaclinicaltrialinvolvingwithdrawaloftreatmentqualitativestudy AT whitedavid staffexperiencesofclosingoutaclinicaltrialinvolvingwithdrawaloftreatmentqualitativestudy AT rankindavid staffexperiencesofclosingoutaclinicaltrialinvolvingwithdrawaloftreatmentqualitativestudy AT elliottjackie staffexperiencesofclosingoutaclinicaltrialinvolvingwithdrawaloftreatmentqualitativestudy AT taylorcarolin staffexperiencesofclosingoutaclinicaltrialinvolvingwithdrawaloftreatmentqualitativestudy AT coopercindy staffexperiencesofclosingoutaclinicaltrialinvolvingwithdrawaloftreatmentqualitativestudy AT hellersimon staffexperiencesofclosingoutaclinicaltrialinvolvingwithdrawaloftreatmentqualitativestudy AT hallowellnina staffexperiencesofclosingoutaclinicaltrialinvolvingwithdrawaloftreatmentqualitativestudy |