Cargando…

New horizons in treatment of osteoporosis

BACKGROUND: Prevalence of osteoporosis is increasing both in developed and developing countries. Due to rapid growth in the burden and cost of osteoporosis, worldwide, it seems reasonable to focus on the reduction of fractures as the main goal of treatment. Although, efficient pharmacological agents...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tabatabaei-Malazy, Ozra, Salari, Pooneh, Khashayar, Patricia, Larijani, Bagher
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5297185/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28173850
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40199-017-0167-z
_version_ 1782505694652530688
author Tabatabaei-Malazy, Ozra
Salari, Pooneh
Khashayar, Patricia
Larijani, Bagher
author_facet Tabatabaei-Malazy, Ozra
Salari, Pooneh
Khashayar, Patricia
Larijani, Bagher
author_sort Tabatabaei-Malazy, Ozra
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Prevalence of osteoporosis is increasing both in developed and developing countries. Due to rapid growth in the burden and cost of osteoporosis, worldwide, it seems reasonable to focus on the reduction of fractures as the main goal of treatment. Although, efficient pharmacological agents are available for the treatment of osteoporosis, there still remains a need to more specific drugs with less adverse effects. MAIN BODY: This review article provides a brief update on the pathogenesis, presenting current pharmacological products approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) or Europe, and also newer therapeutic agents to treat osteoporosis according to the clinical trial data available at PubMed, UpToDate, International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF), and clinical practice guidelines. As well, the effect of combination therapy and recommendations for future research will be further discussed. SHORT CONCLUSION: The use of current antiresorptive and anabolic agents alone or in combinations for the treatment of osteoporosis entails several limitations. Mainly, their efficacy on non-vertebral fracture reduction is lower than that observed on vertebral fracture. In addition, they have potential adverse events on long time usage. Development of newer agents such as cathepsin k inhibitor and strontium ranelate not only have increased the available options for treating osteoporosis, but also have opened doors of opportunity to improvements in the effective treatment. However, the high cost of new agents have restricted their usage in selective patients who are at high risk of fracture or whom failed response to first line treatment options. Thus, personalized medicine should be considered for future evaluation of genetic risk score and also for environmental exposure assessment. In addition to permanent attention to early diagnosis of osteoporosis and understanding of the pathophysiology of osteoporosis for novel approach in drug discovery, there seems a need to more well-designed clinical trials with larger sample sizes and longer duration on current as well as on newer agents. Also, continuous research on plant-derived components as the source of discovering new agents, and conducting more clinical trials with combination of two or more synthetic drugs, plants, or drug-plant for the treatment of osteoporosis are recommended. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: Summary of treatment modalities for osteoporosis. [Image: see text]
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5297185
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52971852017-02-10 New horizons in treatment of osteoporosis Tabatabaei-Malazy, Ozra Salari, Pooneh Khashayar, Patricia Larijani, Bagher Daru Review Article BACKGROUND: Prevalence of osteoporosis is increasing both in developed and developing countries. Due to rapid growth in the burden and cost of osteoporosis, worldwide, it seems reasonable to focus on the reduction of fractures as the main goal of treatment. Although, efficient pharmacological agents are available for the treatment of osteoporosis, there still remains a need to more specific drugs with less adverse effects. MAIN BODY: This review article provides a brief update on the pathogenesis, presenting current pharmacological products approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) or Europe, and also newer therapeutic agents to treat osteoporosis according to the clinical trial data available at PubMed, UpToDate, International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF), and clinical practice guidelines. As well, the effect of combination therapy and recommendations for future research will be further discussed. SHORT CONCLUSION: The use of current antiresorptive and anabolic agents alone or in combinations for the treatment of osteoporosis entails several limitations. Mainly, their efficacy on non-vertebral fracture reduction is lower than that observed on vertebral fracture. In addition, they have potential adverse events on long time usage. Development of newer agents such as cathepsin k inhibitor and strontium ranelate not only have increased the available options for treating osteoporosis, but also have opened doors of opportunity to improvements in the effective treatment. However, the high cost of new agents have restricted their usage in selective patients who are at high risk of fracture or whom failed response to first line treatment options. Thus, personalized medicine should be considered for future evaluation of genetic risk score and also for environmental exposure assessment. In addition to permanent attention to early diagnosis of osteoporosis and understanding of the pathophysiology of osteoporosis for novel approach in drug discovery, there seems a need to more well-designed clinical trials with larger sample sizes and longer duration on current as well as on newer agents. Also, continuous research on plant-derived components as the source of discovering new agents, and conducting more clinical trials with combination of two or more synthetic drugs, plants, or drug-plant for the treatment of osteoporosis are recommended. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: Summary of treatment modalities for osteoporosis. [Image: see text] BioMed Central 2017-02-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5297185/ /pubmed/28173850 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40199-017-0167-z Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Review Article
Tabatabaei-Malazy, Ozra
Salari, Pooneh
Khashayar, Patricia
Larijani, Bagher
New horizons in treatment of osteoporosis
title New horizons in treatment of osteoporosis
title_full New horizons in treatment of osteoporosis
title_fullStr New horizons in treatment of osteoporosis
title_full_unstemmed New horizons in treatment of osteoporosis
title_short New horizons in treatment of osteoporosis
title_sort new horizons in treatment of osteoporosis
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5297185/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28173850
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40199-017-0167-z
work_keys_str_mv AT tabatabaeimalazyozra newhorizonsintreatmentofosteoporosis
AT salaripooneh newhorizonsintreatmentofosteoporosis
AT khashayarpatricia newhorizonsintreatmentofosteoporosis
AT larijanibagher newhorizonsintreatmentofosteoporosis