Cargando…

Financial toxicity: a potential side effect of prostate cancer treatment among Australian men

The purpose of this study was to understand the extent, nature and variability of the current economic burden of prostate cancer among Australian men. An online cross‐sectional survey was developed that combined pre‐existing economic measures and new questions. With few exceptions, the online survey...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gordon, L.G., Walker, S.M., Mervin, M.C., Lowe, A., Smith, D.P., Gardiner, R.A., Chambers, S.K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5297983/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26423576
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ecc.12392
_version_ 1782505815089872896
author Gordon, L.G.
Walker, S.M.
Mervin, M.C.
Lowe, A.
Smith, D.P.
Gardiner, R.A.
Chambers, S.K.
author_facet Gordon, L.G.
Walker, S.M.
Mervin, M.C.
Lowe, A.
Smith, D.P.
Gardiner, R.A.
Chambers, S.K.
author_sort Gordon, L.G.
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this study was to understand the extent, nature and variability of the current economic burden of prostate cancer among Australian men. An online cross‐sectional survey was developed that combined pre‐existing economic measures and new questions. With few exceptions, the online survey was viable and acceptable to participants. The main outcomes were self‐reported out‐of‐pocket costs of prostate cancer diagnosis and treatment, changes in employment status and household finances. Men were recruited from prostate cancer support groups throughout Australia. Descriptive statistical analyses were undertaken. A total of 289 men responded to the survey during April and June 2013. Our study found that men recently diagnosed (within 16 months of the survey) (n = 65) reported spending a median AU$8000 (interquartile range AU$14 000) for their cancer treatment while 75% of men spent up to AU$17 000 (2012). Twenty per cent of all men found the cost of treating their prostate cancer caused them ‘a great deal’ of distress. The findings suggest a large variability in medical costs for prostate cancer treatment with 5% of men spending $250 or less in out‐of‐pocket expenses and some men facing very high costs. On average, respondents in paid employment at diagnosis stated that they had retired 4–5 years earlier than planned.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5297983
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52979832017-02-22 Financial toxicity: a potential side effect of prostate cancer treatment among Australian men Gordon, L.G. Walker, S.M. Mervin, M.C. Lowe, A. Smith, D.P. Gardiner, R.A. Chambers, S.K. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) Original Articles The purpose of this study was to understand the extent, nature and variability of the current economic burden of prostate cancer among Australian men. An online cross‐sectional survey was developed that combined pre‐existing economic measures and new questions. With few exceptions, the online survey was viable and acceptable to participants. The main outcomes were self‐reported out‐of‐pocket costs of prostate cancer diagnosis and treatment, changes in employment status and household finances. Men were recruited from prostate cancer support groups throughout Australia. Descriptive statistical analyses were undertaken. A total of 289 men responded to the survey during April and June 2013. Our study found that men recently diagnosed (within 16 months of the survey) (n = 65) reported spending a median AU$8000 (interquartile range AU$14 000) for their cancer treatment while 75% of men spent up to AU$17 000 (2012). Twenty per cent of all men found the cost of treating their prostate cancer caused them ‘a great deal’ of distress. The findings suggest a large variability in medical costs for prostate cancer treatment with 5% of men spending $250 or less in out‐of‐pocket expenses and some men facing very high costs. On average, respondents in paid employment at diagnosis stated that they had retired 4–5 years earlier than planned. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-10-01 2017-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5297983/ /pubmed/26423576 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ecc.12392 Text en © 2015 The Authors. European Journal of Cancer Care Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Gordon, L.G.
Walker, S.M.
Mervin, M.C.
Lowe, A.
Smith, D.P.
Gardiner, R.A.
Chambers, S.K.
Financial toxicity: a potential side effect of prostate cancer treatment among Australian men
title Financial toxicity: a potential side effect of prostate cancer treatment among Australian men
title_full Financial toxicity: a potential side effect of prostate cancer treatment among Australian men
title_fullStr Financial toxicity: a potential side effect of prostate cancer treatment among Australian men
title_full_unstemmed Financial toxicity: a potential side effect of prostate cancer treatment among Australian men
title_short Financial toxicity: a potential side effect of prostate cancer treatment among Australian men
title_sort financial toxicity: a potential side effect of prostate cancer treatment among australian men
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5297983/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26423576
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ecc.12392
work_keys_str_mv AT gordonlg financialtoxicityapotentialsideeffectofprostatecancertreatmentamongaustralianmen
AT walkersm financialtoxicityapotentialsideeffectofprostatecancertreatmentamongaustralianmen
AT mervinmc financialtoxicityapotentialsideeffectofprostatecancertreatmentamongaustralianmen
AT lowea financialtoxicityapotentialsideeffectofprostatecancertreatmentamongaustralianmen
AT smithdp financialtoxicityapotentialsideeffectofprostatecancertreatmentamongaustralianmen
AT gardinerra financialtoxicityapotentialsideeffectofprostatecancertreatmentamongaustralianmen
AT chamberssk financialtoxicityapotentialsideeffectofprostatecancertreatmentamongaustralianmen