Cargando…
Quantitative Structure‐activity Relationship (QSAR) Models for Docking Score Correction
In order to improve docking score correction, we developed several structure‐based quantitative structure activity relationship (QSAR) models by protein‐drug docking simulations and applied these models to public affinity data. The prediction models used descriptor‐based regression, and the compound...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5297997/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28001004 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/minf.201600013 |
_version_ | 1782505818113966080 |
---|---|
author | Fukunishi, Yoshifumi Yamasaki, Satoshi Yasumatsu, Isao Takeuchi, Koh Kurosawa, Takashi Nakamura, Haruki |
author_facet | Fukunishi, Yoshifumi Yamasaki, Satoshi Yasumatsu, Isao Takeuchi, Koh Kurosawa, Takashi Nakamura, Haruki |
author_sort | Fukunishi, Yoshifumi |
collection | PubMed |
description | In order to improve docking score correction, we developed several structure‐based quantitative structure activity relationship (QSAR) models by protein‐drug docking simulations and applied these models to public affinity data. The prediction models used descriptor‐based regression, and the compound descriptor was a set of docking scores against multiple (∼600) proteins including nontargets. The binding free energy that corresponded to the docking score was approximated by a weighted average of docking scores for multiple proteins, and we tried linear, weighted linear and polynomial regression models considering the compound similarities. In addition, we tried a combination of these regression models for individual data sets such as IC(50), K(i), and %inhibition values. The cross‐validation results showed that the weighted linear model was more accurate than the simple linear regression model. Thus, the QSAR approaches based on the affinity data of public databases should improve docking scores. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5297997 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-52979972017-02-22 Quantitative Structure‐activity Relationship (QSAR) Models for Docking Score Correction Fukunishi, Yoshifumi Yamasaki, Satoshi Yasumatsu, Isao Takeuchi, Koh Kurosawa, Takashi Nakamura, Haruki Mol Inform Full Papers In order to improve docking score correction, we developed several structure‐based quantitative structure activity relationship (QSAR) models by protein‐drug docking simulations and applied these models to public affinity data. The prediction models used descriptor‐based regression, and the compound descriptor was a set of docking scores against multiple (∼600) proteins including nontargets. The binding free energy that corresponded to the docking score was approximated by a weighted average of docking scores for multiple proteins, and we tried linear, weighted linear and polynomial regression models considering the compound similarities. In addition, we tried a combination of these regression models for individual data sets such as IC(50), K(i), and %inhibition values. The cross‐validation results showed that the weighted linear model was more accurate than the simple linear regression model. Thus, the QSAR approaches based on the affinity data of public databases should improve docking scores. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-04-29 2017-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5297997/ /pubmed/28001004 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/minf.201600013 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Published by Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Full Papers Fukunishi, Yoshifumi Yamasaki, Satoshi Yasumatsu, Isao Takeuchi, Koh Kurosawa, Takashi Nakamura, Haruki Quantitative Structure‐activity Relationship (QSAR) Models for Docking Score Correction |
title | Quantitative Structure‐activity Relationship (QSAR) Models for Docking Score Correction |
title_full | Quantitative Structure‐activity Relationship (QSAR) Models for Docking Score Correction |
title_fullStr | Quantitative Structure‐activity Relationship (QSAR) Models for Docking Score Correction |
title_full_unstemmed | Quantitative Structure‐activity Relationship (QSAR) Models for Docking Score Correction |
title_short | Quantitative Structure‐activity Relationship (QSAR) Models for Docking Score Correction |
title_sort | quantitative structure‐activity relationship (qsar) models for docking score correction |
topic | Full Papers |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5297997/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28001004 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/minf.201600013 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fukunishiyoshifumi quantitativestructureactivityrelationshipqsarmodelsfordockingscorecorrection AT yamasakisatoshi quantitativestructureactivityrelationshipqsarmodelsfordockingscorecorrection AT yasumatsuisao quantitativestructureactivityrelationshipqsarmodelsfordockingscorecorrection AT takeuchikoh quantitativestructureactivityrelationshipqsarmodelsfordockingscorecorrection AT kurosawatakashi quantitativestructureactivityrelationshipqsarmodelsfordockingscorecorrection AT nakamuraharuki quantitativestructureactivityrelationshipqsarmodelsfordockingscorecorrection |