Cargando…

Quantitative Structure‐activity Relationship (QSAR) Models for Docking Score Correction

In order to improve docking score correction, we developed several structure‐based quantitative structure activity relationship (QSAR) models by protein‐drug docking simulations and applied these models to public affinity data. The prediction models used descriptor‐based regression, and the compound...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fukunishi, Yoshifumi, Yamasaki, Satoshi, Yasumatsu, Isao, Takeuchi, Koh, Kurosawa, Takashi, Nakamura, Haruki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5297997/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28001004
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/minf.201600013
_version_ 1782505818113966080
author Fukunishi, Yoshifumi
Yamasaki, Satoshi
Yasumatsu, Isao
Takeuchi, Koh
Kurosawa, Takashi
Nakamura, Haruki
author_facet Fukunishi, Yoshifumi
Yamasaki, Satoshi
Yasumatsu, Isao
Takeuchi, Koh
Kurosawa, Takashi
Nakamura, Haruki
author_sort Fukunishi, Yoshifumi
collection PubMed
description In order to improve docking score correction, we developed several structure‐based quantitative structure activity relationship (QSAR) models by protein‐drug docking simulations and applied these models to public affinity data. The prediction models used descriptor‐based regression, and the compound descriptor was a set of docking scores against multiple (∼600) proteins including nontargets. The binding free energy that corresponded to the docking score was approximated by a weighted average of docking scores for multiple proteins, and we tried linear, weighted linear and polynomial regression models considering the compound similarities. In addition, we tried a combination of these regression models for individual data sets such as IC(50), K(i), and %inhibition values. The cross‐validation results showed that the weighted linear model was more accurate than the simple linear regression model. Thus, the QSAR approaches based on the affinity data of public databases should improve docking scores.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5297997
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52979972017-02-22 Quantitative Structure‐activity Relationship (QSAR) Models for Docking Score Correction Fukunishi, Yoshifumi Yamasaki, Satoshi Yasumatsu, Isao Takeuchi, Koh Kurosawa, Takashi Nakamura, Haruki Mol Inform Full Papers In order to improve docking score correction, we developed several structure‐based quantitative structure activity relationship (QSAR) models by protein‐drug docking simulations and applied these models to public affinity data. The prediction models used descriptor‐based regression, and the compound descriptor was a set of docking scores against multiple (∼600) proteins including nontargets. The binding free energy that corresponded to the docking score was approximated by a weighted average of docking scores for multiple proteins, and we tried linear, weighted linear and polynomial regression models considering the compound similarities. In addition, we tried a combination of these regression models for individual data sets such as IC(50), K(i), and %inhibition values. The cross‐validation results showed that the weighted linear model was more accurate than the simple linear regression model. Thus, the QSAR approaches based on the affinity data of public databases should improve docking scores. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-04-29 2017-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5297997/ /pubmed/28001004 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/minf.201600013 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Published by Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Full Papers
Fukunishi, Yoshifumi
Yamasaki, Satoshi
Yasumatsu, Isao
Takeuchi, Koh
Kurosawa, Takashi
Nakamura, Haruki
Quantitative Structure‐activity Relationship (QSAR) Models for Docking Score Correction
title Quantitative Structure‐activity Relationship (QSAR) Models for Docking Score Correction
title_full Quantitative Structure‐activity Relationship (QSAR) Models for Docking Score Correction
title_fullStr Quantitative Structure‐activity Relationship (QSAR) Models for Docking Score Correction
title_full_unstemmed Quantitative Structure‐activity Relationship (QSAR) Models for Docking Score Correction
title_short Quantitative Structure‐activity Relationship (QSAR) Models for Docking Score Correction
title_sort quantitative structure‐activity relationship (qsar) models for docking score correction
topic Full Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5297997/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28001004
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/minf.201600013
work_keys_str_mv AT fukunishiyoshifumi quantitativestructureactivityrelationshipqsarmodelsfordockingscorecorrection
AT yamasakisatoshi quantitativestructureactivityrelationshipqsarmodelsfordockingscorecorrection
AT yasumatsuisao quantitativestructureactivityrelationshipqsarmodelsfordockingscorecorrection
AT takeuchikoh quantitativestructureactivityrelationshipqsarmodelsfordockingscorecorrection
AT kurosawatakashi quantitativestructureactivityrelationshipqsarmodelsfordockingscorecorrection
AT nakamuraharuki quantitativestructureactivityrelationshipqsarmodelsfordockingscorecorrection