Cargando…

Modeling startle eyeblink electromyogram to assess fear learning

Pavlovian fear conditioning is widely used as a laboratory model of associative learning in human and nonhuman species. In this model, an organism is trained to predict an aversive unconditioned stimulus from initially neutral events (conditioned stimuli, CS). In humans, fear memory is typically mea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Khemka, Saurabh, Tzovara, Athina, Gerster, Samuel, Quednow, Boris B., Bach, Dominik R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5298047/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27753123
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/psyp.12775
_version_ 1782505827250208768
author Khemka, Saurabh
Tzovara, Athina
Gerster, Samuel
Quednow, Boris B.
Bach, Dominik R.
author_facet Khemka, Saurabh
Tzovara, Athina
Gerster, Samuel
Quednow, Boris B.
Bach, Dominik R.
author_sort Khemka, Saurabh
collection PubMed
description Pavlovian fear conditioning is widely used as a laboratory model of associative learning in human and nonhuman species. In this model, an organism is trained to predict an aversive unconditioned stimulus from initially neutral events (conditioned stimuli, CS). In humans, fear memory is typically measured via conditioned autonomic responses or fear‐potentiated startle. For the latter, various analysis approaches have been developed, but a systematic comparison of competing methodologies is lacking. Here, we investigate the suitability of a model‐based approach to startle eyeblink analysis for assessment of fear memory, and compare this to extant analysis strategies. First, we build a psychophysiological model (PsPM) on a generic startle response. Then, we optimize and validate this PsPM on three independent fear‐conditioning data sets. We demonstrate that our model can robustly distinguish aversive (CS+) from nonaversive stimuli (CS‐, i.e., has high predictive validity). Importantly, our model‐based approach captures fear‐potentiated startle during fear retention as well as fear acquisition. Our results establish a PsPM‐based approach to assessment of fear‐potentiated startle, and qualify previous peak‐scoring methods. Our proposed model represents a generic startle response and can potentially be used beyond fear conditioning, for example, to quantify affective startle modulation or prepulse inhibition of the acoustic startle response.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5298047
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52980472017-02-22 Modeling startle eyeblink electromyogram to assess fear learning Khemka, Saurabh Tzovara, Athina Gerster, Samuel Quednow, Boris B. Bach, Dominik R. Psychophysiology Original Articles Pavlovian fear conditioning is widely used as a laboratory model of associative learning in human and nonhuman species. In this model, an organism is trained to predict an aversive unconditioned stimulus from initially neutral events (conditioned stimuli, CS). In humans, fear memory is typically measured via conditioned autonomic responses or fear‐potentiated startle. For the latter, various analysis approaches have been developed, but a systematic comparison of competing methodologies is lacking. Here, we investigate the suitability of a model‐based approach to startle eyeblink analysis for assessment of fear memory, and compare this to extant analysis strategies. First, we build a psychophysiological model (PsPM) on a generic startle response. Then, we optimize and validate this PsPM on three independent fear‐conditioning data sets. We demonstrate that our model can robustly distinguish aversive (CS+) from nonaversive stimuli (CS‐, i.e., has high predictive validity). Importantly, our model‐based approach captures fear‐potentiated startle during fear retention as well as fear acquisition. Our results establish a PsPM‐based approach to assessment of fear‐potentiated startle, and qualify previous peak‐scoring methods. Our proposed model represents a generic startle response and can potentially be used beyond fear conditioning, for example, to quantify affective startle modulation or prepulse inhibition of the acoustic startle response. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-10-18 2017-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5298047/ /pubmed/27753123 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/psyp.12775 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Psychophysiology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Society for Psychophysiological Research This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Khemka, Saurabh
Tzovara, Athina
Gerster, Samuel
Quednow, Boris B.
Bach, Dominik R.
Modeling startle eyeblink electromyogram to assess fear learning
title Modeling startle eyeblink electromyogram to assess fear learning
title_full Modeling startle eyeblink electromyogram to assess fear learning
title_fullStr Modeling startle eyeblink electromyogram to assess fear learning
title_full_unstemmed Modeling startle eyeblink electromyogram to assess fear learning
title_short Modeling startle eyeblink electromyogram to assess fear learning
title_sort modeling startle eyeblink electromyogram to assess fear learning
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5298047/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27753123
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/psyp.12775
work_keys_str_mv AT khemkasaurabh modelingstartleeyeblinkelectromyogramtoassessfearlearning
AT tzovaraathina modelingstartleeyeblinkelectromyogramtoassessfearlearning
AT gerstersamuel modelingstartleeyeblinkelectromyogramtoassessfearlearning
AT quednowborisb modelingstartleeyeblinkelectromyogramtoassessfearlearning
AT bachdominikr modelingstartleeyeblinkelectromyogramtoassessfearlearning