Cargando…

Clinical utility of C-reactive protein to predict treatment response during cystic fibrosis pulmonary exacerbations

RATIONALE: C-reactive protein (CRP) is a systemic marker of inflammation that correlates with disease status in cystic fibrosis (CF). The clinical utility of CRP measurement to guide pulmonary exacerbation (PEx) treatment decisions remains uncertain. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether monitoring CRP d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sharma, Ashutosh, Kirkpatrick, Gordon, Chen, Virginia, Skolnik, Kate, Hollander, Zsuzsanna, Wilcox, Pearce, Quon, Bradley S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5298271/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28178305
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171229
_version_ 1782505846812442624
author Sharma, Ashutosh
Kirkpatrick, Gordon
Chen, Virginia
Skolnik, Kate
Hollander, Zsuzsanna
Wilcox, Pearce
Quon, Bradley S.
author_facet Sharma, Ashutosh
Kirkpatrick, Gordon
Chen, Virginia
Skolnik, Kate
Hollander, Zsuzsanna
Wilcox, Pearce
Quon, Bradley S.
author_sort Sharma, Ashutosh
collection PubMed
description RATIONALE: C-reactive protein (CRP) is a systemic marker of inflammation that correlates with disease status in cystic fibrosis (CF). The clinical utility of CRP measurement to guide pulmonary exacerbation (PEx) treatment decisions remains uncertain. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether monitoring CRP during PEx treatment can be used to predict treatment response. We hypothesized that early changes in CRP can be used to predict treatment response. METHODS: We reviewed all PEx events requiring hospitalization for intravenous (IV) antibiotics over 2 years at our institution. 83 PEx events met our eligibility criteria. CRP levels from admission to day 5 were evaluated to predict treatment non-response, using a modified version of a prior published composite definition. CRP was also evaluated to predict time until next exacerbation (TUNE). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: 53% of 83 PEx events were classified as treatment non-response. Paradoxically, 24% of PEx events were characterized by a ≥ 50% increase in CRP levels within the first five days of treatment. Absolute change in CRP from admission to day 5 was not associated with treatment non-response (p = 0.58). Adjusted for FEV(1)% predicted, admission log(10) CRP was associated with treatment non-response (OR: 2.39; 95% CI: 1.14 to 5.91; p = 0.03) and shorter TUNE (HR: 1.60; 95% CI: 1.13 to 2.27; p = 0.008). The area under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve of admission CRP to predict treatment non-response was 0.72 (95% CI 0.61–0.83; p<0.001). 23% of PEx events were characterized by an admission CRP of > 75 mg/L with a specificity of 90% for treatment non-response. CONCLUSIONS: Admission CRP predicts treatment non-response and time until next exacerbation. A very elevated admission CRP (>75mg/L) is highly specific for treatment non-response and might be used to target high-risk patients for future interventional studies aimed at improving exacerbation outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5298271
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52982712017-02-17 Clinical utility of C-reactive protein to predict treatment response during cystic fibrosis pulmonary exacerbations Sharma, Ashutosh Kirkpatrick, Gordon Chen, Virginia Skolnik, Kate Hollander, Zsuzsanna Wilcox, Pearce Quon, Bradley S. PLoS One Research Article RATIONALE: C-reactive protein (CRP) is a systemic marker of inflammation that correlates with disease status in cystic fibrosis (CF). The clinical utility of CRP measurement to guide pulmonary exacerbation (PEx) treatment decisions remains uncertain. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether monitoring CRP during PEx treatment can be used to predict treatment response. We hypothesized that early changes in CRP can be used to predict treatment response. METHODS: We reviewed all PEx events requiring hospitalization for intravenous (IV) antibiotics over 2 years at our institution. 83 PEx events met our eligibility criteria. CRP levels from admission to day 5 were evaluated to predict treatment non-response, using a modified version of a prior published composite definition. CRP was also evaluated to predict time until next exacerbation (TUNE). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: 53% of 83 PEx events were classified as treatment non-response. Paradoxically, 24% of PEx events were characterized by a ≥ 50% increase in CRP levels within the first five days of treatment. Absolute change in CRP from admission to day 5 was not associated with treatment non-response (p = 0.58). Adjusted for FEV(1)% predicted, admission log(10) CRP was associated with treatment non-response (OR: 2.39; 95% CI: 1.14 to 5.91; p = 0.03) and shorter TUNE (HR: 1.60; 95% CI: 1.13 to 2.27; p = 0.008). The area under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve of admission CRP to predict treatment non-response was 0.72 (95% CI 0.61–0.83; p<0.001). 23% of PEx events were characterized by an admission CRP of > 75 mg/L with a specificity of 90% for treatment non-response. CONCLUSIONS: Admission CRP predicts treatment non-response and time until next exacerbation. A very elevated admission CRP (>75mg/L) is highly specific for treatment non-response and might be used to target high-risk patients for future interventional studies aimed at improving exacerbation outcomes. Public Library of Science 2017-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5298271/ /pubmed/28178305 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171229 Text en © 2017 Sharma et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Sharma, Ashutosh
Kirkpatrick, Gordon
Chen, Virginia
Skolnik, Kate
Hollander, Zsuzsanna
Wilcox, Pearce
Quon, Bradley S.
Clinical utility of C-reactive protein to predict treatment response during cystic fibrosis pulmonary exacerbations
title Clinical utility of C-reactive protein to predict treatment response during cystic fibrosis pulmonary exacerbations
title_full Clinical utility of C-reactive protein to predict treatment response during cystic fibrosis pulmonary exacerbations
title_fullStr Clinical utility of C-reactive protein to predict treatment response during cystic fibrosis pulmonary exacerbations
title_full_unstemmed Clinical utility of C-reactive protein to predict treatment response during cystic fibrosis pulmonary exacerbations
title_short Clinical utility of C-reactive protein to predict treatment response during cystic fibrosis pulmonary exacerbations
title_sort clinical utility of c-reactive protein to predict treatment response during cystic fibrosis pulmonary exacerbations
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5298271/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28178305
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171229
work_keys_str_mv AT sharmaashutosh clinicalutilityofcreactiveproteintopredicttreatmentresponseduringcysticfibrosispulmonaryexacerbations
AT kirkpatrickgordon clinicalutilityofcreactiveproteintopredicttreatmentresponseduringcysticfibrosispulmonaryexacerbations
AT chenvirginia clinicalutilityofcreactiveproteintopredicttreatmentresponseduringcysticfibrosispulmonaryexacerbations
AT skolnikkate clinicalutilityofcreactiveproteintopredicttreatmentresponseduringcysticfibrosispulmonaryexacerbations
AT hollanderzsuzsanna clinicalutilityofcreactiveproteintopredicttreatmentresponseduringcysticfibrosispulmonaryexacerbations
AT wilcoxpearce clinicalutilityofcreactiveproteintopredicttreatmentresponseduringcysticfibrosispulmonaryexacerbations
AT quonbradleys clinicalutilityofcreactiveproteintopredicttreatmentresponseduringcysticfibrosispulmonaryexacerbations