Cargando…

Appraising the methodological quality of the clinical practice guideline for diabetes mellitus using the AGREE II instrument: a methodological evaluation

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the methodological quality of the Palestinian Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes Mellitus using the Translated Arabic Version of the AGREE II. DESIGN: Methodological evaluation. A cross-cultural adaptation framework was followed to translate and develop a standardised T...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Radwan, Mahmoud, Akbari Sari, Ali, Rashidian, Arash, Takian, Amirhossein, Abou-Dagga, Sanaa, Elsous, Aymen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5298436/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28203385
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2054270416682673
_version_ 1782505868948930560
author Radwan, Mahmoud
Akbari Sari, Ali
Rashidian, Arash
Takian, Amirhossein
Abou-Dagga, Sanaa
Elsous, Aymen
author_facet Radwan, Mahmoud
Akbari Sari, Ali
Rashidian, Arash
Takian, Amirhossein
Abou-Dagga, Sanaa
Elsous, Aymen
author_sort Radwan, Mahmoud
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the methodological quality of the Palestinian Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes Mellitus using the Translated Arabic Version of the AGREE II. DESIGN: Methodological evaluation. A cross-cultural adaptation framework was followed to translate and develop a standardised Translated Arabic Version of the AGREE II. SETTING: Palestinian Primary Healthcare Centres. PARTICIPANTS: Sixteen appraisers independently evaluated the Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes Mellitus using the Translated Arabic Version of the AGREE II. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Methodological quality of diabetic guideline. RESULTS: The Translated Arabic Version of the AGREE II showed an acceptable reliability and validity. Internal consistency ranged between 0.67 and 0.88 (Cronbach’s α). Intra-class coefficient among appraisers ranged between 0.56 and 0.88. The quality of this guideline is low. Both domains ‘Scope and Purpose’ and ‘Clarity of Presentation’ had the highest quality scores (66.7% and 61.5%, respectively), whereas the scores for ‘Applicability’, ‘Stakeholder Involvement’, ‘Rigour of Development’ and ‘Editorial Independence’ were the lowest (27%, 35%, 36.5%, and 40%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that the quality of this Clinical Practice Guideline is disappointingly low. To improve the quality of current and future guidelines, the AGREE II instrument is extremely recommended to be incorporated as a gold standard for developing, evaluating or updating the Palestinian Clinical Practice Guidelines. Future guidelines can be improved by setting specific strategies to overcome implementation barriers with respect to economic considerations, engaging of all relevant end-users and patients, ensuring a rigorous methodology for searching, selecting and synthesising the evidences and recommendations, and addressing potential conflict of interests within the development group.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5298436
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52984362017-02-15 Appraising the methodological quality of the clinical practice guideline for diabetes mellitus using the AGREE II instrument: a methodological evaluation Radwan, Mahmoud Akbari Sari, Ali Rashidian, Arash Takian, Amirhossein Abou-Dagga, Sanaa Elsous, Aymen JRSM Open Research Article OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the methodological quality of the Palestinian Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes Mellitus using the Translated Arabic Version of the AGREE II. DESIGN: Methodological evaluation. A cross-cultural adaptation framework was followed to translate and develop a standardised Translated Arabic Version of the AGREE II. SETTING: Palestinian Primary Healthcare Centres. PARTICIPANTS: Sixteen appraisers independently evaluated the Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes Mellitus using the Translated Arabic Version of the AGREE II. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Methodological quality of diabetic guideline. RESULTS: The Translated Arabic Version of the AGREE II showed an acceptable reliability and validity. Internal consistency ranged between 0.67 and 0.88 (Cronbach’s α). Intra-class coefficient among appraisers ranged between 0.56 and 0.88. The quality of this guideline is low. Both domains ‘Scope and Purpose’ and ‘Clarity of Presentation’ had the highest quality scores (66.7% and 61.5%, respectively), whereas the scores for ‘Applicability’, ‘Stakeholder Involvement’, ‘Rigour of Development’ and ‘Editorial Independence’ were the lowest (27%, 35%, 36.5%, and 40%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that the quality of this Clinical Practice Guideline is disappointingly low. To improve the quality of current and future guidelines, the AGREE II instrument is extremely recommended to be incorporated as a gold standard for developing, evaluating or updating the Palestinian Clinical Practice Guidelines. Future guidelines can be improved by setting specific strategies to overcome implementation barriers with respect to economic considerations, engaging of all relevant end-users and patients, ensuring a rigorous methodology for searching, selecting and synthesising the evidences and recommendations, and addressing potential conflict of interests within the development group. SAGE Publications 2017-01-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5298436/ /pubmed/28203385 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2054270416682673 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page(https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Research Article
Radwan, Mahmoud
Akbari Sari, Ali
Rashidian, Arash
Takian, Amirhossein
Abou-Dagga, Sanaa
Elsous, Aymen
Appraising the methodological quality of the clinical practice guideline for diabetes mellitus using the AGREE II instrument: a methodological evaluation
title Appraising the methodological quality of the clinical practice guideline for diabetes mellitus using the AGREE II instrument: a methodological evaluation
title_full Appraising the methodological quality of the clinical practice guideline for diabetes mellitus using the AGREE II instrument: a methodological evaluation
title_fullStr Appraising the methodological quality of the clinical practice guideline for diabetes mellitus using the AGREE II instrument: a methodological evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Appraising the methodological quality of the clinical practice guideline for diabetes mellitus using the AGREE II instrument: a methodological evaluation
title_short Appraising the methodological quality of the clinical practice guideline for diabetes mellitus using the AGREE II instrument: a methodological evaluation
title_sort appraising the methodological quality of the clinical practice guideline for diabetes mellitus using the agree ii instrument: a methodological evaluation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5298436/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28203385
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2054270416682673
work_keys_str_mv AT radwanmahmoud appraisingthemethodologicalqualityoftheclinicalpracticeguidelinefordiabetesmellitususingtheagreeiiinstrumentamethodologicalevaluation
AT akbarisariali appraisingthemethodologicalqualityoftheclinicalpracticeguidelinefordiabetesmellitususingtheagreeiiinstrumentamethodologicalevaluation
AT rashidianarash appraisingthemethodologicalqualityoftheclinicalpracticeguidelinefordiabetesmellitususingtheagreeiiinstrumentamethodologicalevaluation
AT takianamirhossein appraisingthemethodologicalqualityoftheclinicalpracticeguidelinefordiabetesmellitususingtheagreeiiinstrumentamethodologicalevaluation
AT aboudaggasanaa appraisingthemethodologicalqualityoftheclinicalpracticeguidelinefordiabetesmellitususingtheagreeiiinstrumentamethodologicalevaluation
AT elsousaymen appraisingthemethodologicalqualityoftheclinicalpracticeguidelinefordiabetesmellitususingtheagreeiiinstrumentamethodologicalevaluation