Cargando…

Mean Glenoid Defect Size and Location Associated With Anterior Shoulder Instability: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND: There is a strong correlation between glenoid defect size and recurrent anterior shoulder instability. A better understanding of glenoid defects could lead to improved treatments and outcomes. PURPOSE: To (1) determine the rate of reporting numeric measurements for glenoid defect size, (...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gottschalk, Lionel J., Bois, Aaron J., Shelby, Marcus A., Miniaci, Anthony, Jones, Morgan H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2017
Materias:
8
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5298460/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28203591
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967116676269
_version_ 1782505871197077504
author Gottschalk, Lionel J.
Bois, Aaron J.
Shelby, Marcus A.
Miniaci, Anthony
Jones, Morgan H.
author_facet Gottschalk, Lionel J.
Bois, Aaron J.
Shelby, Marcus A.
Miniaci, Anthony
Jones, Morgan H.
author_sort Gottschalk, Lionel J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is a strong correlation between glenoid defect size and recurrent anterior shoulder instability. A better understanding of glenoid defects could lead to improved treatments and outcomes. PURPOSE: To (1) determine the rate of reporting numeric measurements for glenoid defect size, (2) determine the consistency of glenoid defect size and location reported within the literature, (3) define the typical size and location of glenoid defects, and (4) determine whether a correlation exists between defect size and treatment outcome. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: PubMed, Ovid, and Cochrane databases were searched for clinical studies measuring glenoid defect size or location. We excluded studies with defect size requirements or pathology other than anterior instability and studies that included patients with known prior surgery. Our search produced 83 studies; 38 studies provided numeric measurements for glenoid defect size and 2 for defect location. RESULTS: From 1981 to 2000, a total of 5.6% (1 of 18) of the studies reported numeric measurements for glenoid defect size; from 2001 to 2014, the rate of reporting glenoid defects increased to 58.7% (37 of 63). Fourteen studies (n = 1363 shoulders) reported defect size ranges for percentage loss of glenoid width, and 9 studies (n = 570 shoulders) reported defect size ranges for percentage loss of glenoid surface area. According to 2 studies, the mean glenoid defect orientation was pointing toward the 3:01 and 3:20 positions on the glenoid clock face. CONCLUSION: Since 2001, the rate of reporting numeric measurements for glenoid defect size was only 58.7%. Among studies reporting the percentage loss of glenoid width, 23.6% of shoulders had a defect between 10% and 25%, and among studies reporting the percentage loss of glenoid surface area, 44.7% of shoulders had a defect between 5% and 20%. There is significant variability in the way glenoid bone loss is measured, calculated, and reported.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5298460
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52984602017-02-15 Mean Glenoid Defect Size and Location Associated With Anterior Shoulder Instability: A Systematic Review Gottschalk, Lionel J. Bois, Aaron J. Shelby, Marcus A. Miniaci, Anthony Jones, Morgan H. Orthop J Sports Med 8 BACKGROUND: There is a strong correlation between glenoid defect size and recurrent anterior shoulder instability. A better understanding of glenoid defects could lead to improved treatments and outcomes. PURPOSE: To (1) determine the rate of reporting numeric measurements for glenoid defect size, (2) determine the consistency of glenoid defect size and location reported within the literature, (3) define the typical size and location of glenoid defects, and (4) determine whether a correlation exists between defect size and treatment outcome. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: PubMed, Ovid, and Cochrane databases were searched for clinical studies measuring glenoid defect size or location. We excluded studies with defect size requirements or pathology other than anterior instability and studies that included patients with known prior surgery. Our search produced 83 studies; 38 studies provided numeric measurements for glenoid defect size and 2 for defect location. RESULTS: From 1981 to 2000, a total of 5.6% (1 of 18) of the studies reported numeric measurements for glenoid defect size; from 2001 to 2014, the rate of reporting glenoid defects increased to 58.7% (37 of 63). Fourteen studies (n = 1363 shoulders) reported defect size ranges for percentage loss of glenoid width, and 9 studies (n = 570 shoulders) reported defect size ranges for percentage loss of glenoid surface area. According to 2 studies, the mean glenoid defect orientation was pointing toward the 3:01 and 3:20 positions on the glenoid clock face. CONCLUSION: Since 2001, the rate of reporting numeric measurements for glenoid defect size was only 58.7%. Among studies reporting the percentage loss of glenoid width, 23.6% of shoulders had a defect between 10% and 25%, and among studies reporting the percentage loss of glenoid surface area, 44.7% of shoulders had a defect between 5% and 20%. There is significant variability in the way glenoid bone loss is measured, calculated, and reported. SAGE Publications 2017-01-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5298460/ /pubmed/28203591 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967116676269 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle 8
Gottschalk, Lionel J.
Bois, Aaron J.
Shelby, Marcus A.
Miniaci, Anthony
Jones, Morgan H.
Mean Glenoid Defect Size and Location Associated With Anterior Shoulder Instability: A Systematic Review
title Mean Glenoid Defect Size and Location Associated With Anterior Shoulder Instability: A Systematic Review
title_full Mean Glenoid Defect Size and Location Associated With Anterior Shoulder Instability: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Mean Glenoid Defect Size and Location Associated With Anterior Shoulder Instability: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Mean Glenoid Defect Size and Location Associated With Anterior Shoulder Instability: A Systematic Review
title_short Mean Glenoid Defect Size and Location Associated With Anterior Shoulder Instability: A Systematic Review
title_sort mean glenoid defect size and location associated with anterior shoulder instability: a systematic review
topic 8
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5298460/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28203591
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967116676269
work_keys_str_mv AT gottschalklionelj meanglenoiddefectsizeandlocationassociatedwithanteriorshoulderinstabilityasystematicreview
AT boisaaronj meanglenoiddefectsizeandlocationassociatedwithanteriorshoulderinstabilityasystematicreview
AT shelbymarcusa meanglenoiddefectsizeandlocationassociatedwithanteriorshoulderinstabilityasystematicreview
AT miniacianthony meanglenoiddefectsizeandlocationassociatedwithanteriorshoulderinstabilityasystematicreview
AT jonesmorganh meanglenoiddefectsizeandlocationassociatedwithanteriorshoulderinstabilityasystematicreview