Cargando…

How Are We Measuring Patient Satisfaction After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction?

BACKGROUND: Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is one of the most common orthopaedic operations in the United States. The long-term impact of ACL reconstruction is controversial, however, as longer term data have failed to demonstrate that ACL reconstruction helps alter the natur...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kahlenberg, Cynthia A., Nwachukwu, Benedict U., Ferraro, Richard A., Schairer, William W., Steinhaus, Michael E., Allen, Answorth A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2016
Materias:
25
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5298515/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28203583
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967116673971
_version_ 1782505877458124800
author Kahlenberg, Cynthia A.
Nwachukwu, Benedict U.
Ferraro, Richard A.
Schairer, William W.
Steinhaus, Michael E.
Allen, Answorth A.
author_facet Kahlenberg, Cynthia A.
Nwachukwu, Benedict U.
Ferraro, Richard A.
Schairer, William W.
Steinhaus, Michael E.
Allen, Answorth A.
author_sort Kahlenberg, Cynthia A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is one of the most common orthopaedic operations in the United States. The long-term impact of ACL reconstruction is controversial, however, as longer term data have failed to demonstrate that ACL reconstruction helps alter the natural history of early onset osteoarthritis that occurs after ACL injury. There is significant interest in evaluating the value of ACL reconstruction surgeries. PURPOSE: To examine the quality of patient satisfaction reporting after ACL reconstruction surgery. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: A systematic review of the MEDLINE database was performed using the PubMed interface. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines as well as the PRISMA checklist were employed. The initial search yielded 267 studies. The inclusion criteria were: English language, US patient population, clinical outcome study of ACL reconstruction surgery, and reporting of patient satisfaction included in the study. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. RESULTS: A total of 22 studies met the inclusion criteria. These studies comprised a total of 1984 patients with a mean age of 31.9 years at the time of surgery and a mean follow-up period of 59.3 months. The majority of studies were evidence level 4 (n = 18; 81.8%), had a mean Newcastle-Ottawa scale score of 5.5, and were published before 2006 (n = 17; 77.3%); 5 studies (22.7%) failed to clearly describe their method for determining patient satisfaction. The most commonly used method for assessing satisfaction was a 0 to 10 satisfaction scale (n = 11; 50.0%). Among studies using a 0 to 10 scale, mean satisfaction ranged from 7.4 to 10.0. Patient-reported outcome and objective functional measures for ACL stability and knee function were positively correlated with patient satisfaction. Degenerative knee change was negatively correlated with satisfaction. CONCLUSION: The level of evidence for studies reporting patient satisfaction is low, and the methodologies for reporting patient satisfaction are variable. Additionally, within the past decade there has been a significant decline in the inclusion of this outcome measure within published ACL studies. As sports surgeons are increasingly called on to demonstrate the value of operative procedures, attention should be paid to understanding and reporting patient satisfaction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5298515
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52985152017-02-15 How Are We Measuring Patient Satisfaction After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction? Kahlenberg, Cynthia A. Nwachukwu, Benedict U. Ferraro, Richard A. Schairer, William W. Steinhaus, Michael E. Allen, Answorth A. Orthop J Sports Med 25 BACKGROUND: Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is one of the most common orthopaedic operations in the United States. The long-term impact of ACL reconstruction is controversial, however, as longer term data have failed to demonstrate that ACL reconstruction helps alter the natural history of early onset osteoarthritis that occurs after ACL injury. There is significant interest in evaluating the value of ACL reconstruction surgeries. PURPOSE: To examine the quality of patient satisfaction reporting after ACL reconstruction surgery. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: A systematic review of the MEDLINE database was performed using the PubMed interface. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines as well as the PRISMA checklist were employed. The initial search yielded 267 studies. The inclusion criteria were: English language, US patient population, clinical outcome study of ACL reconstruction surgery, and reporting of patient satisfaction included in the study. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. RESULTS: A total of 22 studies met the inclusion criteria. These studies comprised a total of 1984 patients with a mean age of 31.9 years at the time of surgery and a mean follow-up period of 59.3 months. The majority of studies were evidence level 4 (n = 18; 81.8%), had a mean Newcastle-Ottawa scale score of 5.5, and were published before 2006 (n = 17; 77.3%); 5 studies (22.7%) failed to clearly describe their method for determining patient satisfaction. The most commonly used method for assessing satisfaction was a 0 to 10 satisfaction scale (n = 11; 50.0%). Among studies using a 0 to 10 scale, mean satisfaction ranged from 7.4 to 10.0. Patient-reported outcome and objective functional measures for ACL stability and knee function were positively correlated with patient satisfaction. Degenerative knee change was negatively correlated with satisfaction. CONCLUSION: The level of evidence for studies reporting patient satisfaction is low, and the methodologies for reporting patient satisfaction are variable. Additionally, within the past decade there has been a significant decline in the inclusion of this outcome measure within published ACL studies. As sports surgeons are increasingly called on to demonstrate the value of operative procedures, attention should be paid to understanding and reporting patient satisfaction. SAGE Publications 2016-12-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5298515/ /pubmed/28203583 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967116673971 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle 25
Kahlenberg, Cynthia A.
Nwachukwu, Benedict U.
Ferraro, Richard A.
Schairer, William W.
Steinhaus, Michael E.
Allen, Answorth A.
How Are We Measuring Patient Satisfaction After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction?
title How Are We Measuring Patient Satisfaction After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction?
title_full How Are We Measuring Patient Satisfaction After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction?
title_fullStr How Are We Measuring Patient Satisfaction After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction?
title_full_unstemmed How Are We Measuring Patient Satisfaction After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction?
title_short How Are We Measuring Patient Satisfaction After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction?
title_sort how are we measuring patient satisfaction after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction?
topic 25
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5298515/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28203583
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967116673971
work_keys_str_mv AT kahlenbergcynthiaa howarewemeasuringpatientsatisfactionafteranteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction
AT nwachukwubenedictu howarewemeasuringpatientsatisfactionafteranteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction
AT ferraroricharda howarewemeasuringpatientsatisfactionafteranteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction
AT schairerwilliamw howarewemeasuringpatientsatisfactionafteranteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction
AT steinhausmichaele howarewemeasuringpatientsatisfactionafteranteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction
AT allenanswortha howarewemeasuringpatientsatisfactionafteranteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction