Cargando…

Electronic Support for Retrospective Analysis in the Field of Radiation Oncology: Proof of Principle Using an Example of Fractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy of 251 Meningioma Patients

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study is to verify the possible benefit of a clinical data warehouse (DWH) for retrospective analysis in the field of radiation oncology. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We manually and electronically (using DWH) evaluated demographic, radiotherapy, and outcome data from 251...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rutzner, Sandra, Fietkau, Rainer, Ganslandt, Thomas, Prokosch, Hans-Ulrich, Lubgan, Dorota
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5298960/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28232905
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2017.00016
_version_ 1782505944827035648
author Rutzner, Sandra
Fietkau, Rainer
Ganslandt, Thomas
Prokosch, Hans-Ulrich
Lubgan, Dorota
author_facet Rutzner, Sandra
Fietkau, Rainer
Ganslandt, Thomas
Prokosch, Hans-Ulrich
Lubgan, Dorota
author_sort Rutzner, Sandra
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study is to verify the possible benefit of a clinical data warehouse (DWH) for retrospective analysis in the field of radiation oncology. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We manually and electronically (using DWH) evaluated demographic, radiotherapy, and outcome data from 251 meningioma patients, who were irradiated from January 2002 to January 2015 at the Department of Radiation Oncology of the Erlangen University Hospital. Furthermore, we linked the Oncology Information System (OIS) MOSAIQ(®) to the DWH in order to gain access to irradiation data. We compared the manual and electronic data retrieval method in terms of congruence of data, corresponding time, and personal requirements (physician, physicist, scientific associate). RESULTS: The electronically supported data retrieval (DWH) showed an average of 93.9% correct data and significantly (p = 0.009) better result compared to manual data retrieval (91.2%). Utilizing a DWH enables the user to replace large amounts of manual activities (668 h), offers the ability to significantly reduce data collection time and labor demand (35 h), while simultaneously improving data quality. In our case, work time for manually data retrieval was 637 h for the scientific assistant, 26 h for the medical physicist, and 5 h for the physician (total 668 h). CONCLUSION: Our study shows that a DWH is particularly useful for retrospective analysis in the radiation oncology field. Routine clinical data for a large patient group can be provided ready for analysis to the scientist and data collection time can be significantly reduced. Furthermore, linking multiple data sources in a DWH offers the ability to improve data quality for retrospective analysis, and future research can be simplified.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5298960
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52989602017-02-23 Electronic Support for Retrospective Analysis in the Field of Radiation Oncology: Proof of Principle Using an Example of Fractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy of 251 Meningioma Patients Rutzner, Sandra Fietkau, Rainer Ganslandt, Thomas Prokosch, Hans-Ulrich Lubgan, Dorota Front Oncol Oncology INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study is to verify the possible benefit of a clinical data warehouse (DWH) for retrospective analysis in the field of radiation oncology. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We manually and electronically (using DWH) evaluated demographic, radiotherapy, and outcome data from 251 meningioma patients, who were irradiated from January 2002 to January 2015 at the Department of Radiation Oncology of the Erlangen University Hospital. Furthermore, we linked the Oncology Information System (OIS) MOSAIQ(®) to the DWH in order to gain access to irradiation data. We compared the manual and electronic data retrieval method in terms of congruence of data, corresponding time, and personal requirements (physician, physicist, scientific associate). RESULTS: The electronically supported data retrieval (DWH) showed an average of 93.9% correct data and significantly (p = 0.009) better result compared to manual data retrieval (91.2%). Utilizing a DWH enables the user to replace large amounts of manual activities (668 h), offers the ability to significantly reduce data collection time and labor demand (35 h), while simultaneously improving data quality. In our case, work time for manually data retrieval was 637 h for the scientific assistant, 26 h for the medical physicist, and 5 h for the physician (total 668 h). CONCLUSION: Our study shows that a DWH is particularly useful for retrospective analysis in the radiation oncology field. Routine clinical data for a large patient group can be provided ready for analysis to the scientist and data collection time can be significantly reduced. Furthermore, linking multiple data sources in a DWH offers the ability to improve data quality for retrospective analysis, and future research can be simplified. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-02-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5298960/ /pubmed/28232905 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2017.00016 Text en Copyright © 2017 Rutzner, Fietkau, Ganslandt, Prokosch and Lubgan. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Rutzner, Sandra
Fietkau, Rainer
Ganslandt, Thomas
Prokosch, Hans-Ulrich
Lubgan, Dorota
Electronic Support for Retrospective Analysis in the Field of Radiation Oncology: Proof of Principle Using an Example of Fractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy of 251 Meningioma Patients
title Electronic Support for Retrospective Analysis in the Field of Radiation Oncology: Proof of Principle Using an Example of Fractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy of 251 Meningioma Patients
title_full Electronic Support for Retrospective Analysis in the Field of Radiation Oncology: Proof of Principle Using an Example of Fractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy of 251 Meningioma Patients
title_fullStr Electronic Support for Retrospective Analysis in the Field of Radiation Oncology: Proof of Principle Using an Example of Fractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy of 251 Meningioma Patients
title_full_unstemmed Electronic Support for Retrospective Analysis in the Field of Radiation Oncology: Proof of Principle Using an Example of Fractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy of 251 Meningioma Patients
title_short Electronic Support for Retrospective Analysis in the Field of Radiation Oncology: Proof of Principle Using an Example of Fractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy of 251 Meningioma Patients
title_sort electronic support for retrospective analysis in the field of radiation oncology: proof of principle using an example of fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy of 251 meningioma patients
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5298960/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28232905
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2017.00016
work_keys_str_mv AT rutznersandra electronicsupportforretrospectiveanalysisinthefieldofradiationoncologyproofofprincipleusinganexampleoffractionatedstereotacticradiotherapyof251meningiomapatients
AT fietkaurainer electronicsupportforretrospectiveanalysisinthefieldofradiationoncologyproofofprincipleusinganexampleoffractionatedstereotacticradiotherapyof251meningiomapatients
AT ganslandtthomas electronicsupportforretrospectiveanalysisinthefieldofradiationoncologyproofofprincipleusinganexampleoffractionatedstereotacticradiotherapyof251meningiomapatients
AT prokoschhansulrich electronicsupportforretrospectiveanalysisinthefieldofradiationoncologyproofofprincipleusinganexampleoffractionatedstereotacticradiotherapyof251meningiomapatients
AT lubgandorota electronicsupportforretrospectiveanalysisinthefieldofradiationoncologyproofofprincipleusinganexampleoffractionatedstereotacticradiotherapyof251meningiomapatients