Cargando…

The impact of selected factors on parameters of weight loss after sleeve gastrectomy

INTRODUCTION: The effectiveness of sleeve gastrectomy has been confirmed in many studies. The impact of individual factors on the parameters of weight loss is still not clear. AIM: To identify important factors affecting the parameters of weight loss after sleeve gastrectomy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: T...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Binda, Artur, Jaworski, Paweł, Kudlicka, Emilia, Ciesielski, Adam, Cabaj, Hubert, Tarnowski, Wiesław
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Termedia Publishing House 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5299089/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28194250
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/wiitm.2016.64999
Descripción
Sumario:INTRODUCTION: The effectiveness of sleeve gastrectomy has been confirmed in many studies. The impact of individual factors on the parameters of weight loss is still not clear. AIM: To identify important factors affecting the parameters of weight loss after sleeve gastrectomy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The impact of prognostic factors and postoperative care components on body mass index (BMI) and percentage excess weight loss (%EWL) was assessed in a group of 100 consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. RESULTS: The baseline BMI and body mass in patients with BMI < 30 kg/m(2) and BMI ≥ 30 kg/m(2) 12 months after surgery were, respectively, 39.7 ±3.2 vs. 45.9 ±4.6 kg/m(2), p < 0.0001, and 114.4 ±16.8 vs. 130.3 ±18.5 kg, p < 0.0001. In the group with EWL < 50%, the average age was 47.1 ±7.7 vs. 40.6 ±10.8 in the group with EWL ≥ 50%, p = 0.0025. In the group of patients with preoperative weight loss, %EWL was 61.4 ±17.2 vs. 53.3 ±19.3% in the group with no weight loss, p = 0.0496. Body mass index of the patients who started physical activities was 30.6 ±4.2 kg/m(2) vs. 34.0 ±5.6 kg/m(2) in the patients with no physical activity, p = 0.0013, and %EWL was 63.4 ±14.6 vs. 47.0 ±19.9%, p < 0.0001, respectively. In the case of patients regularly consulted by a dietician BMI was 30.6 ±4.2 kg/m(2) vs. 35.1 ±5.5 kg/m(2) in the group without systematic consultations, p < 0.0001, and %EWL was 63.1 ±15.1% vs. 42.3 ±18.2%, p < 0.0001. CONCLUSIONS: Lower baseline body weight parameters, younger age, preoperative weight loss, starting systematic physical activities and constant care of a dietician were conducive to achieving better results of surgery, as assessed on the basis of changes in BMI and %EWL.