Cargando…

Assessment and classification of patients with myocardial injury and infarction in clinical practice

Myocardial injury is common in patients without acute coronary syndrome, and international guidelines recommend patients with myocardial infarction are classified by aetiology. The universal definition differentiates patients with myocardial infarction due to plaque rupture (type 1) from those due t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chapman, Andrew R, Adamson, Philip D, Mills, Nicholas L
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5299097/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27806987
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2016-309530
_version_ 1782505963479105536
author Chapman, Andrew R
Adamson, Philip D
Mills, Nicholas L
author_facet Chapman, Andrew R
Adamson, Philip D
Mills, Nicholas L
author_sort Chapman, Andrew R
collection PubMed
description Myocardial injury is common in patients without acute coronary syndrome, and international guidelines recommend patients with myocardial infarction are classified by aetiology. The universal definition differentiates patients with myocardial infarction due to plaque rupture (type 1) from those due to myocardial oxygen supply-demand imbalance (type 2) secondary to other acute illnesses. Patients with myocardial necrosis, but no symptoms or signs of myocardial ischaemia, are classified as acute or chronic myocardial injury. This classification has not been widely adopted in practice, because the diagnostic criteria for type 2 myocardial infarction encompass a wide range of presentations, and the implications of the diagnosis are uncertain. However, both myocardial injury and type 2 myocardial infarction are common, occurring in more than one-third of all hospitalised patients. These patients have poor short-term and long-term outcomes with two-thirds dead in 5 years. The classification of patients with myocardial infarction continues to evolve, and future guidelines are likely to recognise the importance of identifying coronary artery disease in type 2 myocardial infarction. Clinicians should consider whether coronary artery disease has contributed to myocardial injury, as selected patients are likely to benefit from further investigation and in these patients targeted secondary prevention has the potential to improve outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5299097
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52990972017-03-02 Assessment and classification of patients with myocardial injury and infarction in clinical practice Chapman, Andrew R Adamson, Philip D Mills, Nicholas L Heart Review Myocardial injury is common in patients without acute coronary syndrome, and international guidelines recommend patients with myocardial infarction are classified by aetiology. The universal definition differentiates patients with myocardial infarction due to plaque rupture (type 1) from those due to myocardial oxygen supply-demand imbalance (type 2) secondary to other acute illnesses. Patients with myocardial necrosis, but no symptoms or signs of myocardial ischaemia, are classified as acute or chronic myocardial injury. This classification has not been widely adopted in practice, because the diagnostic criteria for type 2 myocardial infarction encompass a wide range of presentations, and the implications of the diagnosis are uncertain. However, both myocardial injury and type 2 myocardial infarction are common, occurring in more than one-third of all hospitalised patients. These patients have poor short-term and long-term outcomes with two-thirds dead in 5 years. The classification of patients with myocardial infarction continues to evolve, and future guidelines are likely to recognise the importance of identifying coronary artery disease in type 2 myocardial infarction. Clinicians should consider whether coronary artery disease has contributed to myocardial injury, as selected patients are likely to benefit from further investigation and in these patients targeted secondary prevention has the potential to improve outcomes. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-01-01 2016-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5299097/ /pubmed/27806987 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2016-309530 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Review
Chapman, Andrew R
Adamson, Philip D
Mills, Nicholas L
Assessment and classification of patients with myocardial injury and infarction in clinical practice
title Assessment and classification of patients with myocardial injury and infarction in clinical practice
title_full Assessment and classification of patients with myocardial injury and infarction in clinical practice
title_fullStr Assessment and classification of patients with myocardial injury and infarction in clinical practice
title_full_unstemmed Assessment and classification of patients with myocardial injury and infarction in clinical practice
title_short Assessment and classification of patients with myocardial injury and infarction in clinical practice
title_sort assessment and classification of patients with myocardial injury and infarction in clinical practice
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5299097/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27806987
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2016-309530
work_keys_str_mv AT chapmanandrewr assessmentandclassificationofpatientswithmyocardialinjuryandinfarctioninclinicalpractice
AT adamsonphilipd assessmentandclassificationofpatientswithmyocardialinjuryandinfarctioninclinicalpractice
AT millsnicholasl assessmentandclassificationofpatientswithmyocardialinjuryandinfarctioninclinicalpractice