Cargando…
Is Hydrogen Breath Test with Lactulose Feasible for Measuring Gastrocecal Transit in Critically Ill Children? Pilot Study about Modification of the Technique
Introduction. Gastrocecal transit time (GCTT) can be measured by exhaled hydrogen after lactulose intake (lactulose-eH(2) test). The objectives were to assess whether it is possible to carry out this test in critically ill children with and without mechanical ventilation (MV) and to analyze whether...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5299192/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28246601 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/5878659 |
_version_ | 1782505982260150272 |
---|---|
author | López, J. Sánchez, C. Fernández, S. N. González, R. Solana, M. J. Urbano, J. Tolín, M. López-Herce, J. |
author_facet | López, J. Sánchez, C. Fernández, S. N. González, R. Solana, M. J. Urbano, J. Tolín, M. López-Herce, J. |
author_sort | López, J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction. Gastrocecal transit time (GCTT) can be measured by exhaled hydrogen after lactulose intake (lactulose-eH(2) test). The objectives were to assess whether it is possible to carry out this test in critically ill children with and without mechanical ventilation (MV) and to analyze whether the results are consistent with clinical findings. Methods. Patients admitted to the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) for more than 3 days were included. Those with gastrointestinal disease prior to admission were excluded. A modified technique to obtain eH(2) from the ventilator tubes was performed. Results. Sixteen patients (37.5% boys) with a median age of 19 (5–86.5) months were included. Five patients (31.2%) were breathing spontaneously but lactulose-eH(2) test could not be performed while it could be performed successfully in the 11 patients with MV. Seven patients (63.3%) did not show an eH(2) peak. The other 4 showed a median time of 130 min (78.7–278.7 min) from lactulose intake to a 10 ppm eH(2) peak. Children with an eH(2) peak had intestinal movements earlier [6.5 (1.5–38.5) versus 44 (24–72) hours p = 0.545]. Conclusion. Although the designed adaption is useful for collecting breath samples, lactulose-eH(2) test may not be useful for measuring GCTT in critically ill children. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5299192 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-52991922017-02-28 Is Hydrogen Breath Test with Lactulose Feasible for Measuring Gastrocecal Transit in Critically Ill Children? Pilot Study about Modification of the Technique López, J. Sánchez, C. Fernández, S. N. González, R. Solana, M. J. Urbano, J. Tolín, M. López-Herce, J. Biomed Res Int Research Article Introduction. Gastrocecal transit time (GCTT) can be measured by exhaled hydrogen after lactulose intake (lactulose-eH(2) test). The objectives were to assess whether it is possible to carry out this test in critically ill children with and without mechanical ventilation (MV) and to analyze whether the results are consistent with clinical findings. Methods. Patients admitted to the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) for more than 3 days were included. Those with gastrointestinal disease prior to admission were excluded. A modified technique to obtain eH(2) from the ventilator tubes was performed. Results. Sixteen patients (37.5% boys) with a median age of 19 (5–86.5) months were included. Five patients (31.2%) were breathing spontaneously but lactulose-eH(2) test could not be performed while it could be performed successfully in the 11 patients with MV. Seven patients (63.3%) did not show an eH(2) peak. The other 4 showed a median time of 130 min (78.7–278.7 min) from lactulose intake to a 10 ppm eH(2) peak. Children with an eH(2) peak had intestinal movements earlier [6.5 (1.5–38.5) versus 44 (24–72) hours p = 0.545]. Conclusion. Although the designed adaption is useful for collecting breath samples, lactulose-eH(2) test may not be useful for measuring GCTT in critically ill children. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2017 2017-01-26 /pmc/articles/PMC5299192/ /pubmed/28246601 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/5878659 Text en Copyright © 2017 J. López et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article López, J. Sánchez, C. Fernández, S. N. González, R. Solana, M. J. Urbano, J. Tolín, M. López-Herce, J. Is Hydrogen Breath Test with Lactulose Feasible for Measuring Gastrocecal Transit in Critically Ill Children? Pilot Study about Modification of the Technique |
title | Is Hydrogen Breath Test with Lactulose Feasible for Measuring Gastrocecal Transit in Critically Ill Children? Pilot Study about Modification of the Technique |
title_full | Is Hydrogen Breath Test with Lactulose Feasible for Measuring Gastrocecal Transit in Critically Ill Children? Pilot Study about Modification of the Technique |
title_fullStr | Is Hydrogen Breath Test with Lactulose Feasible for Measuring Gastrocecal Transit in Critically Ill Children? Pilot Study about Modification of the Technique |
title_full_unstemmed | Is Hydrogen Breath Test with Lactulose Feasible for Measuring Gastrocecal Transit in Critically Ill Children? Pilot Study about Modification of the Technique |
title_short | Is Hydrogen Breath Test with Lactulose Feasible for Measuring Gastrocecal Transit in Critically Ill Children? Pilot Study about Modification of the Technique |
title_sort | is hydrogen breath test with lactulose feasible for measuring gastrocecal transit in critically ill children? pilot study about modification of the technique |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5299192/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28246601 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/5878659 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lopezj ishydrogenbreathtestwithlactulosefeasibleformeasuringgastrocecaltransitincriticallyillchildrenpilotstudyaboutmodificationofthetechnique AT sanchezc ishydrogenbreathtestwithlactulosefeasibleformeasuringgastrocecaltransitincriticallyillchildrenpilotstudyaboutmodificationofthetechnique AT fernandezsn ishydrogenbreathtestwithlactulosefeasibleformeasuringgastrocecaltransitincriticallyillchildrenpilotstudyaboutmodificationofthetechnique AT gonzalezr ishydrogenbreathtestwithlactulosefeasibleformeasuringgastrocecaltransitincriticallyillchildrenpilotstudyaboutmodificationofthetechnique AT solanamj ishydrogenbreathtestwithlactulosefeasibleformeasuringgastrocecaltransitincriticallyillchildrenpilotstudyaboutmodificationofthetechnique AT urbanoj ishydrogenbreathtestwithlactulosefeasibleformeasuringgastrocecaltransitincriticallyillchildrenpilotstudyaboutmodificationofthetechnique AT tolinm ishydrogenbreathtestwithlactulosefeasibleformeasuringgastrocecaltransitincriticallyillchildrenpilotstudyaboutmodificationofthetechnique AT lopezhercej ishydrogenbreathtestwithlactulosefeasibleformeasuringgastrocecaltransitincriticallyillchildrenpilotstudyaboutmodificationofthetechnique |