Cargando…

Is Hydrogen Breath Test with Lactulose Feasible for Measuring Gastrocecal Transit in Critically Ill Children? Pilot Study about Modification of the Technique

Introduction. Gastrocecal transit time (GCTT) can be measured by exhaled hydrogen after lactulose intake (lactulose-eH(2) test). The objectives were to assess whether it is possible to carry out this test in critically ill children with and without mechanical ventilation (MV) and to analyze whether...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: López, J., Sánchez, C., Fernández, S. N., González, R., Solana, M. J., Urbano, J., Tolín, M., López-Herce, J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5299192/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28246601
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/5878659
_version_ 1782505982260150272
author López, J.
Sánchez, C.
Fernández, S. N.
González, R.
Solana, M. J.
Urbano, J.
Tolín, M.
López-Herce, J.
author_facet López, J.
Sánchez, C.
Fernández, S. N.
González, R.
Solana, M. J.
Urbano, J.
Tolín, M.
López-Herce, J.
author_sort López, J.
collection PubMed
description Introduction. Gastrocecal transit time (GCTT) can be measured by exhaled hydrogen after lactulose intake (lactulose-eH(2) test). The objectives were to assess whether it is possible to carry out this test in critically ill children with and without mechanical ventilation (MV) and to analyze whether the results are consistent with clinical findings. Methods. Patients admitted to the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) for more than 3 days were included. Those with gastrointestinal disease prior to admission were excluded. A modified technique to obtain eH(2) from the ventilator tubes was performed. Results. Sixteen patients (37.5% boys) with a median age of 19 (5–86.5) months were included. Five patients (31.2%) were breathing spontaneously but lactulose-eH(2) test could not be performed while it could be performed successfully in the 11 patients with MV. Seven patients (63.3%) did not show an eH(2) peak. The other 4 showed a median time of 130 min (78.7–278.7 min) from lactulose intake to a 10 ppm eH(2) peak. Children with an eH(2) peak had intestinal movements earlier [6.5 (1.5–38.5) versus 44 (24–72) hours p = 0.545]. Conclusion. Although the designed adaption is useful for collecting breath samples, lactulose-eH(2) test may not be useful for measuring GCTT in critically ill children.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5299192
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52991922017-02-28 Is Hydrogen Breath Test with Lactulose Feasible for Measuring Gastrocecal Transit in Critically Ill Children? Pilot Study about Modification of the Technique López, J. Sánchez, C. Fernández, S. N. González, R. Solana, M. J. Urbano, J. Tolín, M. López-Herce, J. Biomed Res Int Research Article Introduction. Gastrocecal transit time (GCTT) can be measured by exhaled hydrogen after lactulose intake (lactulose-eH(2) test). The objectives were to assess whether it is possible to carry out this test in critically ill children with and without mechanical ventilation (MV) and to analyze whether the results are consistent with clinical findings. Methods. Patients admitted to the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) for more than 3 days were included. Those with gastrointestinal disease prior to admission were excluded. A modified technique to obtain eH(2) from the ventilator tubes was performed. Results. Sixteen patients (37.5% boys) with a median age of 19 (5–86.5) months were included. Five patients (31.2%) were breathing spontaneously but lactulose-eH(2) test could not be performed while it could be performed successfully in the 11 patients with MV. Seven patients (63.3%) did not show an eH(2) peak. The other 4 showed a median time of 130 min (78.7–278.7 min) from lactulose intake to a 10 ppm eH(2) peak. Children with an eH(2) peak had intestinal movements earlier [6.5 (1.5–38.5) versus 44 (24–72) hours p = 0.545]. Conclusion. Although the designed adaption is useful for collecting breath samples, lactulose-eH(2) test may not be useful for measuring GCTT in critically ill children. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2017 2017-01-26 /pmc/articles/PMC5299192/ /pubmed/28246601 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/5878659 Text en Copyright © 2017 J. López et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
López, J.
Sánchez, C.
Fernández, S. N.
González, R.
Solana, M. J.
Urbano, J.
Tolín, M.
López-Herce, J.
Is Hydrogen Breath Test with Lactulose Feasible for Measuring Gastrocecal Transit in Critically Ill Children? Pilot Study about Modification of the Technique
title Is Hydrogen Breath Test with Lactulose Feasible for Measuring Gastrocecal Transit in Critically Ill Children? Pilot Study about Modification of the Technique
title_full Is Hydrogen Breath Test with Lactulose Feasible for Measuring Gastrocecal Transit in Critically Ill Children? Pilot Study about Modification of the Technique
title_fullStr Is Hydrogen Breath Test with Lactulose Feasible for Measuring Gastrocecal Transit in Critically Ill Children? Pilot Study about Modification of the Technique
title_full_unstemmed Is Hydrogen Breath Test with Lactulose Feasible for Measuring Gastrocecal Transit in Critically Ill Children? Pilot Study about Modification of the Technique
title_short Is Hydrogen Breath Test with Lactulose Feasible for Measuring Gastrocecal Transit in Critically Ill Children? Pilot Study about Modification of the Technique
title_sort is hydrogen breath test with lactulose feasible for measuring gastrocecal transit in critically ill children? pilot study about modification of the technique
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5299192/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28246601
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/5878659
work_keys_str_mv AT lopezj ishydrogenbreathtestwithlactulosefeasibleformeasuringgastrocecaltransitincriticallyillchildrenpilotstudyaboutmodificationofthetechnique
AT sanchezc ishydrogenbreathtestwithlactulosefeasibleformeasuringgastrocecaltransitincriticallyillchildrenpilotstudyaboutmodificationofthetechnique
AT fernandezsn ishydrogenbreathtestwithlactulosefeasibleformeasuringgastrocecaltransitincriticallyillchildrenpilotstudyaboutmodificationofthetechnique
AT gonzalezr ishydrogenbreathtestwithlactulosefeasibleformeasuringgastrocecaltransitincriticallyillchildrenpilotstudyaboutmodificationofthetechnique
AT solanamj ishydrogenbreathtestwithlactulosefeasibleformeasuringgastrocecaltransitincriticallyillchildrenpilotstudyaboutmodificationofthetechnique
AT urbanoj ishydrogenbreathtestwithlactulosefeasibleformeasuringgastrocecaltransitincriticallyillchildrenpilotstudyaboutmodificationofthetechnique
AT tolinm ishydrogenbreathtestwithlactulosefeasibleformeasuringgastrocecaltransitincriticallyillchildrenpilotstudyaboutmodificationofthetechnique
AT lopezhercej ishydrogenbreathtestwithlactulosefeasibleformeasuringgastrocecaltransitincriticallyillchildrenpilotstudyaboutmodificationofthetechnique