Cargando…

Outcomes and Recommendations of an Indian Expert Panel for Improved Practice in Controlled Ovarian Stimulation for Assisted Reproductive Technology

Purpose. To improve success of in vitro fertilization (IVF), assisted reproductive technology (ART) experts addressed four questions. What is optimum oocytes number leading to highest live birth rate (LBR)? Are cohort size and embryo quality correlated? Does gonadotropin type affect oocyte yield? Sh...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ahemmed, Baiju, Sundarapandian, Vani, Gutgutia, Rohit, Balasubramanyam, Sathya, Jagtap, Richa, Biliangady, Reeta, Gupta, Priti, Jadhav, Sachin, Satwik, Ruma, Dewda, Pavitra Raj, Thakor, Priti, Esteves, Sandro C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5299198/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28246628
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/9451235
_version_ 1782505983594987520
author Ahemmed, Baiju
Sundarapandian, Vani
Gutgutia, Rohit
Balasubramanyam, Sathya
Jagtap, Richa
Biliangady, Reeta
Gupta, Priti
Jadhav, Sachin
Satwik, Ruma
Dewda, Pavitra Raj
Thakor, Priti
Esteves, Sandro C.
author_facet Ahemmed, Baiju
Sundarapandian, Vani
Gutgutia, Rohit
Balasubramanyam, Sathya
Jagtap, Richa
Biliangady, Reeta
Gupta, Priti
Jadhav, Sachin
Satwik, Ruma
Dewda, Pavitra Raj
Thakor, Priti
Esteves, Sandro C.
author_sort Ahemmed, Baiju
collection PubMed
description Purpose. To improve success of in vitro fertilization (IVF), assisted reproductive technology (ART) experts addressed four questions. What is optimum oocytes number leading to highest live birth rate (LBR)? Are cohort size and embryo quality correlated? Does gonadotropin type affect oocyte yield? Should “freeze-all” policy be adopted in cycles with progesterone >1.5 ng/mL on day of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) administration? Methods. Electronic database search included ten studies on which panel gave opinions for improving current practice in controlled ovarian stimulation for ART. Results. Strong association existed between retrieved oocytes number (RON) and LBRs. RON impacted likelihood of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). Embryo euploidy decreased with age, not with cohort size. Progesterone > 1.5 ng/dL did not impair cycle outcomes in patients with high cohorts and showed disparate results on day of hCG administration. Conclusions. Ovarian stimulation should be designed to retrieve 10–15 oocytes/treatment. Accurate dosage, gonadotropin type, should be selected as per prediction markers of ovarian response. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist based protocols are advised to avoid OHSS. Cumulative pregnancy rate was most relevant pregnancy endpoint in ART. Cycles with serum progesterone ≥1.5 ng/dL on day of hCG administration should not adopt “freeze-all” policy. Further research is needed due to lack of data availability on progesterone threshold or index.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5299198
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52991982017-02-28 Outcomes and Recommendations of an Indian Expert Panel for Improved Practice in Controlled Ovarian Stimulation for Assisted Reproductive Technology Ahemmed, Baiju Sundarapandian, Vani Gutgutia, Rohit Balasubramanyam, Sathya Jagtap, Richa Biliangady, Reeta Gupta, Priti Jadhav, Sachin Satwik, Ruma Dewda, Pavitra Raj Thakor, Priti Esteves, Sandro C. Int J Reprod Med Review Article Purpose. To improve success of in vitro fertilization (IVF), assisted reproductive technology (ART) experts addressed four questions. What is optimum oocytes number leading to highest live birth rate (LBR)? Are cohort size and embryo quality correlated? Does gonadotropin type affect oocyte yield? Should “freeze-all” policy be adopted in cycles with progesterone >1.5 ng/mL on day of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) administration? Methods. Electronic database search included ten studies on which panel gave opinions for improving current practice in controlled ovarian stimulation for ART. Results. Strong association existed between retrieved oocytes number (RON) and LBRs. RON impacted likelihood of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). Embryo euploidy decreased with age, not with cohort size. Progesterone > 1.5 ng/dL did not impair cycle outcomes in patients with high cohorts and showed disparate results on day of hCG administration. Conclusions. Ovarian stimulation should be designed to retrieve 10–15 oocytes/treatment. Accurate dosage, gonadotropin type, should be selected as per prediction markers of ovarian response. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist based protocols are advised to avoid OHSS. Cumulative pregnancy rate was most relevant pregnancy endpoint in ART. Cycles with serum progesterone ≥1.5 ng/dL on day of hCG administration should not adopt “freeze-all” policy. Further research is needed due to lack of data availability on progesterone threshold or index. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2017 2017-01-26 /pmc/articles/PMC5299198/ /pubmed/28246628 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/9451235 Text en Copyright © 2017 Baiju Ahemmed et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Ahemmed, Baiju
Sundarapandian, Vani
Gutgutia, Rohit
Balasubramanyam, Sathya
Jagtap, Richa
Biliangady, Reeta
Gupta, Priti
Jadhav, Sachin
Satwik, Ruma
Dewda, Pavitra Raj
Thakor, Priti
Esteves, Sandro C.
Outcomes and Recommendations of an Indian Expert Panel for Improved Practice in Controlled Ovarian Stimulation for Assisted Reproductive Technology
title Outcomes and Recommendations of an Indian Expert Panel for Improved Practice in Controlled Ovarian Stimulation for Assisted Reproductive Technology
title_full Outcomes and Recommendations of an Indian Expert Panel for Improved Practice in Controlled Ovarian Stimulation for Assisted Reproductive Technology
title_fullStr Outcomes and Recommendations of an Indian Expert Panel for Improved Practice in Controlled Ovarian Stimulation for Assisted Reproductive Technology
title_full_unstemmed Outcomes and Recommendations of an Indian Expert Panel for Improved Practice in Controlled Ovarian Stimulation for Assisted Reproductive Technology
title_short Outcomes and Recommendations of an Indian Expert Panel for Improved Practice in Controlled Ovarian Stimulation for Assisted Reproductive Technology
title_sort outcomes and recommendations of an indian expert panel for improved practice in controlled ovarian stimulation for assisted reproductive technology
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5299198/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28246628
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/9451235
work_keys_str_mv AT ahemmedbaiju outcomesandrecommendationsofanindianexpertpanelforimprovedpracticeincontrolledovarianstimulationforassistedreproductivetechnology
AT sundarapandianvani outcomesandrecommendationsofanindianexpertpanelforimprovedpracticeincontrolledovarianstimulationforassistedreproductivetechnology
AT gutgutiarohit outcomesandrecommendationsofanindianexpertpanelforimprovedpracticeincontrolledovarianstimulationforassistedreproductivetechnology
AT balasubramanyamsathya outcomesandrecommendationsofanindianexpertpanelforimprovedpracticeincontrolledovarianstimulationforassistedreproductivetechnology
AT jagtapricha outcomesandrecommendationsofanindianexpertpanelforimprovedpracticeincontrolledovarianstimulationforassistedreproductivetechnology
AT biliangadyreeta outcomesandrecommendationsofanindianexpertpanelforimprovedpracticeincontrolledovarianstimulationforassistedreproductivetechnology
AT guptapriti outcomesandrecommendationsofanindianexpertpanelforimprovedpracticeincontrolledovarianstimulationforassistedreproductivetechnology
AT jadhavsachin outcomesandrecommendationsofanindianexpertpanelforimprovedpracticeincontrolledovarianstimulationforassistedreproductivetechnology
AT satwikruma outcomesandrecommendationsofanindianexpertpanelforimprovedpracticeincontrolledovarianstimulationforassistedreproductivetechnology
AT dewdapavitraraj outcomesandrecommendationsofanindianexpertpanelforimprovedpracticeincontrolledovarianstimulationforassistedreproductivetechnology
AT thakorpriti outcomesandrecommendationsofanindianexpertpanelforimprovedpracticeincontrolledovarianstimulationforassistedreproductivetechnology
AT estevessandroc outcomesandrecommendationsofanindianexpertpanelforimprovedpracticeincontrolledovarianstimulationforassistedreproductivetechnology