Cargando…

Glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists compared with basal insulins for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta‐analysis

AIMS: Since 2005, several glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists (GLP‐1 RAs) have been approved to treat people with type 2 diabetes. These agents are considered for use at the same point in the treatment paradigm as basal insulins. A comprehensive comparison of these drug classes, therefore, can...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Singh, Sonal, Wright, Eugene E., Kwan, Anita Y. M., Thompson, Juliette C., Syed, Iqra A., Korol, Ellen E., Waser, Nathalie A., Yu, Maria B., Juneja, Rattan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5299485/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27717130
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dom.12805
_version_ 1782506035007717376
author Singh, Sonal
Wright, Eugene E.
Kwan, Anita Y. M.
Thompson, Juliette C.
Syed, Iqra A.
Korol, Ellen E.
Waser, Nathalie A.
Yu, Maria B.
Juneja, Rattan
author_facet Singh, Sonal
Wright, Eugene E.
Kwan, Anita Y. M.
Thompson, Juliette C.
Syed, Iqra A.
Korol, Ellen E.
Waser, Nathalie A.
Yu, Maria B.
Juneja, Rattan
author_sort Singh, Sonal
collection PubMed
description AIMS: Since 2005, several glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists (GLP‐1 RAs) have been approved to treat people with type 2 diabetes. These agents are considered for use at the same point in the treatment paradigm as basal insulins. A comprehensive comparison of these drug classes, therefore, can help inform treatment decisions. This systematic review and meta‐analysis assessed the clinical efficacy and safety of GLP‐1 RAs compared with basal insulins. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL and PubMed databases were searched. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of ≥16 weeks’ duration comparing GLP‐1 RAs vs basal insulins in adults with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with oral antihyperglycemic drugs were included. Data on the change from baseline to 26 weeks (±10 weeks) of treatment in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and weight, as well as the proportion of patients experiencing hypoglycaemia, were extracted. Fixed‐effect pairwise meta‐analyses were conducted where data were available from ≥2 studies. RESULTS: Fifteen RCTs were identified and 11 were meta‐analysed. The once‐weekly GLP‐1 RAs, exenatide long acting release (LAR) and dulaglutide, led to greater, statistically significant mean HbA1c reductions vs basal insulins (exenatide: −0.31% [95% confidence interval −0.42, −0.19], dulaglutide: −0.39% [−0.49, −0.29]) whilst once‐daily liraglutide and twice‐daily exenatide did not (liraglutide: 0.06% [−0.06, 0.18], exenatide: 0.01% [−0.11, 0.13]). Mean weight reduction was seen with all GLP‐1 RAs while mean weight gain was seen with basal insulins. Interpretation of the analysis of hypoglycaemia was limited by inconsistent definitions and reporting. Because of the limited number of available studies sensitivity analyses to explore heterogeneity could not be conducted. CONCLUSIONS: Although weight reduction is seen with all GLP‐1 RA’s, only the once‐weekly agents, exenatide LAR and dulaglutide, demonstrate significant HbA1c reductions when compared to basal insulins.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5299485
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52994852017-02-22 Glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists compared with basal insulins for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta‐analysis Singh, Sonal Wright, Eugene E. Kwan, Anita Y. M. Thompson, Juliette C. Syed, Iqra A. Korol, Ellen E. Waser, Nathalie A. Yu, Maria B. Juneja, Rattan Diabetes Obes Metab Original Articles AIMS: Since 2005, several glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists (GLP‐1 RAs) have been approved to treat people with type 2 diabetes. These agents are considered for use at the same point in the treatment paradigm as basal insulins. A comprehensive comparison of these drug classes, therefore, can help inform treatment decisions. This systematic review and meta‐analysis assessed the clinical efficacy and safety of GLP‐1 RAs compared with basal insulins. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL and PubMed databases were searched. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of ≥16 weeks’ duration comparing GLP‐1 RAs vs basal insulins in adults with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with oral antihyperglycemic drugs were included. Data on the change from baseline to 26 weeks (±10 weeks) of treatment in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and weight, as well as the proportion of patients experiencing hypoglycaemia, were extracted. Fixed‐effect pairwise meta‐analyses were conducted where data were available from ≥2 studies. RESULTS: Fifteen RCTs were identified and 11 were meta‐analysed. The once‐weekly GLP‐1 RAs, exenatide long acting release (LAR) and dulaglutide, led to greater, statistically significant mean HbA1c reductions vs basal insulins (exenatide: −0.31% [95% confidence interval −0.42, −0.19], dulaglutide: −0.39% [−0.49, −0.29]) whilst once‐daily liraglutide and twice‐daily exenatide did not (liraglutide: 0.06% [−0.06, 0.18], exenatide: 0.01% [−0.11, 0.13]). Mean weight reduction was seen with all GLP‐1 RAs while mean weight gain was seen with basal insulins. Interpretation of the analysis of hypoglycaemia was limited by inconsistent definitions and reporting. Because of the limited number of available studies sensitivity analyses to explore heterogeneity could not be conducted. CONCLUSIONS: Although weight reduction is seen with all GLP‐1 RA’s, only the once‐weekly agents, exenatide LAR and dulaglutide, demonstrate significant HbA1c reductions when compared to basal insulins. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2016-12-05 2017-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5299485/ /pubmed/27717130 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dom.12805 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Singh, Sonal
Wright, Eugene E.
Kwan, Anita Y. M.
Thompson, Juliette C.
Syed, Iqra A.
Korol, Ellen E.
Waser, Nathalie A.
Yu, Maria B.
Juneja, Rattan
Glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists compared with basal insulins for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
title Glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists compared with basal insulins for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_full Glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists compared with basal insulins for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_fullStr Glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists compared with basal insulins for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_full_unstemmed Glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists compared with basal insulins for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_short Glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists compared with basal insulins for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_sort glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists compared with basal insulins for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5299485/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27717130
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dom.12805
work_keys_str_mv AT singhsonal glucagonlikepeptide1receptoragonistscomparedwithbasalinsulinsforthetreatmentoftype2diabetesmellitusasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wrighteugenee glucagonlikepeptide1receptoragonistscomparedwithbasalinsulinsforthetreatmentoftype2diabetesmellitusasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT kwananitaym glucagonlikepeptide1receptoragonistscomparedwithbasalinsulinsforthetreatmentoftype2diabetesmellitusasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT thompsonjuliettec glucagonlikepeptide1receptoragonistscomparedwithbasalinsulinsforthetreatmentoftype2diabetesmellitusasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT syediqraa glucagonlikepeptide1receptoragonistscomparedwithbasalinsulinsforthetreatmentoftype2diabetesmellitusasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT korolellene glucagonlikepeptide1receptoragonistscomparedwithbasalinsulinsforthetreatmentoftype2diabetesmellitusasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wasernathaliea glucagonlikepeptide1receptoragonistscomparedwithbasalinsulinsforthetreatmentoftype2diabetesmellitusasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yumariab glucagonlikepeptide1receptoragonistscomparedwithbasalinsulinsforthetreatmentoftype2diabetesmellitusasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT junejarattan glucagonlikepeptide1receptoragonistscomparedwithbasalinsulinsforthetreatmentoftype2diabetesmellitusasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis