Cargando…

Prediction of clinical peanut allergy status among children in Hamilton, Ontario using chart review data collected during 2012–2015

BACKGROUND: Peanut sensitization does not necessarily indicate clinical peanut allergy, and uncertainty as to whether or not there is true peanut allergy can lead to increased anxiety and decreased quality of life for patients and their families. The gold standard for diagnosing clinical peanut alle...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Simms, Elizabeth, Foster, Gary, Arias, Katherine, Larché, Mark, Freitag, Tosha, Walker, Tina, Goncharova, Susanna, Marrin, Andrea, Freitag, Andreas, Jordana, Manel, Waserman, Susan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5299665/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28194191
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13223-017-0179-8
_version_ 1782506069370601472
author Simms, Elizabeth
Foster, Gary
Arias, Katherine
Larché, Mark
Freitag, Tosha
Walker, Tina
Goncharova, Susanna
Marrin, Andrea
Freitag, Andreas
Jordana, Manel
Waserman, Susan
author_facet Simms, Elizabeth
Foster, Gary
Arias, Katherine
Larché, Mark
Freitag, Tosha
Walker, Tina
Goncharova, Susanna
Marrin, Andrea
Freitag, Andreas
Jordana, Manel
Waserman, Susan
author_sort Simms, Elizabeth
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Peanut sensitization does not necessarily indicate clinical peanut allergy, and uncertainty as to whether or not there is true peanut allergy can lead to increased anxiety and decreased quality of life for patients and their families. The gold standard for diagnosing clinical peanut allergy is the oral food challenge, but this method is time-consuming and can cause severe allergic reactions. It would therefore be beneficial to develop a tool for predicting clinical peanut allergy in peanut-sensitized individuals whose peanut allergy status is unknown so as to better determine who requires an oral food challenge for diagnosis. METHODS: Two separate studies were conducted. In Study 1, we recruited 100 participants from the allergy clinic at McMaster University and community allergy outpatient clinics in the greater Hamilton area. We examined 18 different variables from participants and used univariate and multivariable logistic regression analysis to determine how well these variables, singly and in combination, were able to predict clinical peanut allergy status. In Study 2, we conducted a retrospective chart review of a second cohort of 194 participants to investigate the reproducibility of our findings. This was a matched case–control study where 97 peanut-allergic participants were gender- and age-matched to 97 non-allergic control participants. RESULTS: Peanut skin prick test wheal size was the best predictor of clinical peanut allergy in both study cohorts. For every 1 mm increase in wheal size, the odds ratio of an individual having clinical peanut allergy was 2.36 in our first cohort and 4.85 in our second cohort. No other variable approached the predictive power of wheal size. CONCLUSIONS: Peanut skin prick test wheal size is a robust predictor of clinical peanut reactivity. The findings of this study may be useful in guiding clinician decision-making regarding peanut allergy diagnostics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5299665
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52996652017-02-13 Prediction of clinical peanut allergy status among children in Hamilton, Ontario using chart review data collected during 2012–2015 Simms, Elizabeth Foster, Gary Arias, Katherine Larché, Mark Freitag, Tosha Walker, Tina Goncharova, Susanna Marrin, Andrea Freitag, Andreas Jordana, Manel Waserman, Susan Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol Research BACKGROUND: Peanut sensitization does not necessarily indicate clinical peanut allergy, and uncertainty as to whether or not there is true peanut allergy can lead to increased anxiety and decreased quality of life for patients and their families. The gold standard for diagnosing clinical peanut allergy is the oral food challenge, but this method is time-consuming and can cause severe allergic reactions. It would therefore be beneficial to develop a tool for predicting clinical peanut allergy in peanut-sensitized individuals whose peanut allergy status is unknown so as to better determine who requires an oral food challenge for diagnosis. METHODS: Two separate studies were conducted. In Study 1, we recruited 100 participants from the allergy clinic at McMaster University and community allergy outpatient clinics in the greater Hamilton area. We examined 18 different variables from participants and used univariate and multivariable logistic regression analysis to determine how well these variables, singly and in combination, were able to predict clinical peanut allergy status. In Study 2, we conducted a retrospective chart review of a second cohort of 194 participants to investigate the reproducibility of our findings. This was a matched case–control study where 97 peanut-allergic participants were gender- and age-matched to 97 non-allergic control participants. RESULTS: Peanut skin prick test wheal size was the best predictor of clinical peanut allergy in both study cohorts. For every 1 mm increase in wheal size, the odds ratio of an individual having clinical peanut allergy was 2.36 in our first cohort and 4.85 in our second cohort. No other variable approached the predictive power of wheal size. CONCLUSIONS: Peanut skin prick test wheal size is a robust predictor of clinical peanut reactivity. The findings of this study may be useful in guiding clinician decision-making regarding peanut allergy diagnostics. BioMed Central 2017-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5299665/ /pubmed/28194191 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13223-017-0179-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Simms, Elizabeth
Foster, Gary
Arias, Katherine
Larché, Mark
Freitag, Tosha
Walker, Tina
Goncharova, Susanna
Marrin, Andrea
Freitag, Andreas
Jordana, Manel
Waserman, Susan
Prediction of clinical peanut allergy status among children in Hamilton, Ontario using chart review data collected during 2012–2015
title Prediction of clinical peanut allergy status among children in Hamilton, Ontario using chart review data collected during 2012–2015
title_full Prediction of clinical peanut allergy status among children in Hamilton, Ontario using chart review data collected during 2012–2015
title_fullStr Prediction of clinical peanut allergy status among children in Hamilton, Ontario using chart review data collected during 2012–2015
title_full_unstemmed Prediction of clinical peanut allergy status among children in Hamilton, Ontario using chart review data collected during 2012–2015
title_short Prediction of clinical peanut allergy status among children in Hamilton, Ontario using chart review data collected during 2012–2015
title_sort prediction of clinical peanut allergy status among children in hamilton, ontario using chart review data collected during 2012–2015
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5299665/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28194191
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13223-017-0179-8
work_keys_str_mv AT simmselizabeth predictionofclinicalpeanutallergystatusamongchildreninhamiltonontariousingchartreviewdatacollectedduring20122015
AT fostergary predictionofclinicalpeanutallergystatusamongchildreninhamiltonontariousingchartreviewdatacollectedduring20122015
AT ariaskatherine predictionofclinicalpeanutallergystatusamongchildreninhamiltonontariousingchartreviewdatacollectedduring20122015
AT larchemark predictionofclinicalpeanutallergystatusamongchildreninhamiltonontariousingchartreviewdatacollectedduring20122015
AT freitagtosha predictionofclinicalpeanutallergystatusamongchildreninhamiltonontariousingchartreviewdatacollectedduring20122015
AT walkertina predictionofclinicalpeanutallergystatusamongchildreninhamiltonontariousingchartreviewdatacollectedduring20122015
AT goncharovasusanna predictionofclinicalpeanutallergystatusamongchildreninhamiltonontariousingchartreviewdatacollectedduring20122015
AT marrinandrea predictionofclinicalpeanutallergystatusamongchildreninhamiltonontariousingchartreviewdatacollectedduring20122015
AT freitagandreas predictionofclinicalpeanutallergystatusamongchildreninhamiltonontariousingchartreviewdatacollectedduring20122015
AT jordanamanel predictionofclinicalpeanutallergystatusamongchildreninhamiltonontariousingchartreviewdatacollectedduring20122015
AT wasermansusan predictionofclinicalpeanutallergystatusamongchildreninhamiltonontariousingchartreviewdatacollectedduring20122015