Cargando…
In vitro comparative optical bench analysis of a spherical and aspheric optic design of the same IOL model
BACKGROUND: To analyse objective optical properties of the spherical and aspheric design of the same intraocular lens (IOL) model using optical bench analysis. METHODS: This study entailed a comparative analysis of 10 spherical C-flex 570 C and 10 aspheric C-flex 970 C IOLs (Rayner Intraocular Lense...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5299728/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28178942 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-017-0407-5 |
_version_ | 1782506080614481920 |
---|---|
author | Tandogan, Tamer Auffarth, Gerd U. Choi, Chul Y. Liebing, Stephanie Mayer, Christian Khoramnia, Ramin |
author_facet | Tandogan, Tamer Auffarth, Gerd U. Choi, Chul Y. Liebing, Stephanie Mayer, Christian Khoramnia, Ramin |
author_sort | Tandogan, Tamer |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To analyse objective optical properties of the spherical and aspheric design of the same intraocular lens (IOL) model using optical bench analysis. METHODS: This study entailed a comparative analysis of 10 spherical C-flex 570 C and 10 aspheric C-flex 970 C IOLs (Rayner Intraocular Lenses Ltd., Hove, UK) of 26 diopters [D] using an optical bench (OptiSpheric, Trioptics, Germany). In all lenses, we evaluated the modulation transfer function (MTF) at 50 lp/mm and 100 lp/mm and the Strehl Ratio using a 3-mm (photopic) and 4.5-mm (mesopic) aperture. RESULTS: At 50 lp/mm, the MTF values were 0.713/0.805 (C-flex 570 C/C-flex 970 C) for a 3-mm aperture and 0.294/0.591 for a 4.5-mm aperture. At 100 lp/mm, the MTF values were 0.524/0.634 for a 3-mm aperture and 0.198/0.344 for a 4.5-mm aperture. The Strehl Ratio was 0.806/0.925 and 0.237/0.479 for a 3-mm and 4.5-mm aperture respectively. A Mann–Whitney U test revealed all intergroup differences to be statistically significant (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The aspheric IOL design achieved higher MTF values than the spherical design of the same IOL for both apertures. Moreover, the differences between the two designs of the IOL were more prominent for larger apertures. This suggests that the evaluated IOL provides enhanced optical quality to patients with larger pupils or working under mesopic conditions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5299728 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-52997282017-02-13 In vitro comparative optical bench analysis of a spherical and aspheric optic design of the same IOL model Tandogan, Tamer Auffarth, Gerd U. Choi, Chul Y. Liebing, Stephanie Mayer, Christian Khoramnia, Ramin BMC Ophthalmol Research Article BACKGROUND: To analyse objective optical properties of the spherical and aspheric design of the same intraocular lens (IOL) model using optical bench analysis. METHODS: This study entailed a comparative analysis of 10 spherical C-flex 570 C and 10 aspheric C-flex 970 C IOLs (Rayner Intraocular Lenses Ltd., Hove, UK) of 26 diopters [D] using an optical bench (OptiSpheric, Trioptics, Germany). In all lenses, we evaluated the modulation transfer function (MTF) at 50 lp/mm and 100 lp/mm and the Strehl Ratio using a 3-mm (photopic) and 4.5-mm (mesopic) aperture. RESULTS: At 50 lp/mm, the MTF values were 0.713/0.805 (C-flex 570 C/C-flex 970 C) for a 3-mm aperture and 0.294/0.591 for a 4.5-mm aperture. At 100 lp/mm, the MTF values were 0.524/0.634 for a 3-mm aperture and 0.198/0.344 for a 4.5-mm aperture. The Strehl Ratio was 0.806/0.925 and 0.237/0.479 for a 3-mm and 4.5-mm aperture respectively. A Mann–Whitney U test revealed all intergroup differences to be statistically significant (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The aspheric IOL design achieved higher MTF values than the spherical design of the same IOL for both apertures. Moreover, the differences between the two designs of the IOL were more prominent for larger apertures. This suggests that the evaluated IOL provides enhanced optical quality to patients with larger pupils or working under mesopic conditions. BioMed Central 2017-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5299728/ /pubmed/28178942 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-017-0407-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Tandogan, Tamer Auffarth, Gerd U. Choi, Chul Y. Liebing, Stephanie Mayer, Christian Khoramnia, Ramin In vitro comparative optical bench analysis of a spherical and aspheric optic design of the same IOL model |
title | In vitro comparative optical bench analysis of a spherical and aspheric optic design of the same IOL model |
title_full | In vitro comparative optical bench analysis of a spherical and aspheric optic design of the same IOL model |
title_fullStr | In vitro comparative optical bench analysis of a spherical and aspheric optic design of the same IOL model |
title_full_unstemmed | In vitro comparative optical bench analysis of a spherical and aspheric optic design of the same IOL model |
title_short | In vitro comparative optical bench analysis of a spherical and aspheric optic design of the same IOL model |
title_sort | in vitro comparative optical bench analysis of a spherical and aspheric optic design of the same iol model |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5299728/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28178942 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-017-0407-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tandogantamer invitrocomparativeopticalbenchanalysisofasphericalandasphericopticdesignofthesameiolmodel AT auffarthgerdu invitrocomparativeopticalbenchanalysisofasphericalandasphericopticdesignofthesameiolmodel AT choichuly invitrocomparativeopticalbenchanalysisofasphericalandasphericopticdesignofthesameiolmodel AT liebingstephanie invitrocomparativeopticalbenchanalysisofasphericalandasphericopticdesignofthesameiolmodel AT mayerchristian invitrocomparativeopticalbenchanalysisofasphericalandasphericopticdesignofthesameiolmodel AT khoramniaramin invitrocomparativeopticalbenchanalysisofasphericalandasphericopticdesignofthesameiolmodel |