Cargando…
The contribution from psychological, social, and organizational work factors to risk of disability retirement: a systematic review with meta-analyses
BACKGROUND: Previous studies indicate that psychological, social, and organizational factors at work contribute to health, motivation, absence from work, and functional ability. The objective of the study was to assess the current state of knowledge of the contribution of psychological, social, and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5299735/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28178966 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4059-4 |
_version_ | 1782506082180005888 |
---|---|
author | Knardahl, Stein Johannessen, Håkon A. Sterud, Tom Härmä, Mikko Rugulies, Reiner Seitsamo, Jorma Borg, Vilhelm |
author_facet | Knardahl, Stein Johannessen, Håkon A. Sterud, Tom Härmä, Mikko Rugulies, Reiner Seitsamo, Jorma Borg, Vilhelm |
author_sort | Knardahl, Stein |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Previous studies indicate that psychological, social, and organizational factors at work contribute to health, motivation, absence from work, and functional ability. The objective of the study was to assess the current state of knowledge of the contribution of psychological, social, and organizational factors to disability retirement by a systematic review and meta-analyses. METHODS: Data sources: A systematic literature search for studies of retirement due to disability in Medline, Embase, and PsychINFO was performed. Reference lists of relevant articles were hand-searched for additional studies. Data extraction: Internal validity was assessed independently by two referees with a detailed checklist for sources of bias. Conclusions were drawn based on studies with acceptable quality. Data synthesis: We calculated combined effect estimates by means of averaged associations (Risk ratios) across samples, weighting observed associations by the study’s sample size. Thirty-nine studies of accepted quality were found, 37 of which from the Nordic countries. RESULTS: There was moderate evidence for the role of low control (supported by weighted average RR = 1.40; 95% CI = 1.21-1.61) and moderate evidence for the combination of high demands and low control (although weighted average was RR = 1.45; 95% CI = 0.96-2.19) as predictors of disability retirement. There were no major systematic differences in findings between the highest rated and the lowest rated studies that passed the criterion for adequate quality. There was limited evidence for downsizing, organizational change, lack of employee development and supplementary training, repetitive work tasks, effort-reward imbalance to increase risk of disability pension. Very limited evidence was found for job demands, evening or night work, and low social support from ones superior. CONCLUSIONS: Psychological and organizational factors at work contribute to disability retirement with the most robust evidence for the role of work control. We recommend the measurement of specific exposure factors in future studies. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12889-017-4059-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5299735 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-52997352017-02-13 The contribution from psychological, social, and organizational work factors to risk of disability retirement: a systematic review with meta-analyses Knardahl, Stein Johannessen, Håkon A. Sterud, Tom Härmä, Mikko Rugulies, Reiner Seitsamo, Jorma Borg, Vilhelm BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Previous studies indicate that psychological, social, and organizational factors at work contribute to health, motivation, absence from work, and functional ability. The objective of the study was to assess the current state of knowledge of the contribution of psychological, social, and organizational factors to disability retirement by a systematic review and meta-analyses. METHODS: Data sources: A systematic literature search for studies of retirement due to disability in Medline, Embase, and PsychINFO was performed. Reference lists of relevant articles were hand-searched for additional studies. Data extraction: Internal validity was assessed independently by two referees with a detailed checklist for sources of bias. Conclusions were drawn based on studies with acceptable quality. Data synthesis: We calculated combined effect estimates by means of averaged associations (Risk ratios) across samples, weighting observed associations by the study’s sample size. Thirty-nine studies of accepted quality were found, 37 of which from the Nordic countries. RESULTS: There was moderate evidence for the role of low control (supported by weighted average RR = 1.40; 95% CI = 1.21-1.61) and moderate evidence for the combination of high demands and low control (although weighted average was RR = 1.45; 95% CI = 0.96-2.19) as predictors of disability retirement. There were no major systematic differences in findings between the highest rated and the lowest rated studies that passed the criterion for adequate quality. There was limited evidence for downsizing, organizational change, lack of employee development and supplementary training, repetitive work tasks, effort-reward imbalance to increase risk of disability pension. Very limited evidence was found for job demands, evening or night work, and low social support from ones superior. CONCLUSIONS: Psychological and organizational factors at work contribute to disability retirement with the most robust evidence for the role of work control. We recommend the measurement of specific exposure factors in future studies. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12889-017-4059-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5299735/ /pubmed/28178966 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4059-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Knardahl, Stein Johannessen, Håkon A. Sterud, Tom Härmä, Mikko Rugulies, Reiner Seitsamo, Jorma Borg, Vilhelm The contribution from psychological, social, and organizational work factors to risk of disability retirement: a systematic review with meta-analyses |
title | The contribution from psychological, social, and organizational work factors to risk of disability retirement: a systematic review with meta-analyses |
title_full | The contribution from psychological, social, and organizational work factors to risk of disability retirement: a systematic review with meta-analyses |
title_fullStr | The contribution from psychological, social, and organizational work factors to risk of disability retirement: a systematic review with meta-analyses |
title_full_unstemmed | The contribution from psychological, social, and organizational work factors to risk of disability retirement: a systematic review with meta-analyses |
title_short | The contribution from psychological, social, and organizational work factors to risk of disability retirement: a systematic review with meta-analyses |
title_sort | contribution from psychological, social, and organizational work factors to risk of disability retirement: a systematic review with meta-analyses |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5299735/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28178966 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4059-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT knardahlstein thecontributionfrompsychologicalsocialandorganizationalworkfactorstoriskofdisabilityretirementasystematicreviewwithmetaanalyses AT johannessenhakona thecontributionfrompsychologicalsocialandorganizationalworkfactorstoriskofdisabilityretirementasystematicreviewwithmetaanalyses AT sterudtom thecontributionfrompsychologicalsocialandorganizationalworkfactorstoriskofdisabilityretirementasystematicreviewwithmetaanalyses AT harmamikko thecontributionfrompsychologicalsocialandorganizationalworkfactorstoriskofdisabilityretirementasystematicreviewwithmetaanalyses AT ruguliesreiner thecontributionfrompsychologicalsocialandorganizationalworkfactorstoriskofdisabilityretirementasystematicreviewwithmetaanalyses AT seitsamojorma thecontributionfrompsychologicalsocialandorganizationalworkfactorstoriskofdisabilityretirementasystematicreviewwithmetaanalyses AT borgvilhelm thecontributionfrompsychologicalsocialandorganizationalworkfactorstoriskofdisabilityretirementasystematicreviewwithmetaanalyses AT knardahlstein contributionfrompsychologicalsocialandorganizationalworkfactorstoriskofdisabilityretirementasystematicreviewwithmetaanalyses AT johannessenhakona contributionfrompsychologicalsocialandorganizationalworkfactorstoriskofdisabilityretirementasystematicreviewwithmetaanalyses AT sterudtom contributionfrompsychologicalsocialandorganizationalworkfactorstoriskofdisabilityretirementasystematicreviewwithmetaanalyses AT harmamikko contributionfrompsychologicalsocialandorganizationalworkfactorstoriskofdisabilityretirementasystematicreviewwithmetaanalyses AT ruguliesreiner contributionfrompsychologicalsocialandorganizationalworkfactorstoriskofdisabilityretirementasystematicreviewwithmetaanalyses AT seitsamojorma contributionfrompsychologicalsocialandorganizationalworkfactorstoriskofdisabilityretirementasystematicreviewwithmetaanalyses AT borgvilhelm contributionfrompsychologicalsocialandorganizationalworkfactorstoriskofdisabilityretirementasystematicreviewwithmetaanalyses |