Cargando…

A self-locking loop as an alternative to purse-string suture in colon anastomosis: a feasibility study

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer is common in humans where treatment involves surgical removal of the cancerous part of the intestines. In the anastomosis procedure a purse-string suture may be time consuming to perform. The aim was to replace the purse-string suture, to develop and test a self-locking...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Höglund, Odd V., Maxon, Oskar, Grönberg, Anders
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5299739/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28179015
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-017-2412-4
_version_ 1782506083077586944
author Höglund, Odd V.
Maxon, Oskar
Grönberg, Anders
author_facet Höglund, Odd V.
Maxon, Oskar
Grönberg, Anders
author_sort Höglund, Odd V.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer is common in humans where treatment involves surgical removal of the cancerous part of the intestines. In the anastomosis procedure a purse-string suture may be time consuming to perform. The aim was to replace the purse-string suture, to develop and test a self-locking loop for temporary sealing of the lumen in colon anastomosis. METHODS: A new device, a flexible band with a locking mechanism was constructed, the I-Tie(®). Small protrusions, designed for increased friction between device and tissue, were added to one side of the flexible band in order to enhance the grip at closure of the loop around tissue. The device was initially tested in vitro on pig intestines. In an in vivo study, the short-term implant was tested in a new suture-free method, CREX, and with traditional circular staplers for colonic anastomosis. Ten female pigs of approximately 50 kg were used in the in vivo test. The self-locking device was used for closure of the lumen around anvils in CREX (n = 5), and around anvil in traditional circular stapler anastomosis (n = 5). Two self-locking devices were used in each animal. RESULTS: The self-locking device could close the lumen of colon around the anvil and trocar. Subjectively, the device achieved a tight closure of the colon and did not interfere with the anastomosis techniques. CONCLUSIONS: The technology was perceived as potentially timesaving and easy to use. We conclude the device may be an alternative to the traditional purse-string suture for temporary closure of the colon lumen in colon anastomosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5299739
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52997392017-02-13 A self-locking loop as an alternative to purse-string suture in colon anastomosis: a feasibility study Höglund, Odd V. Maxon, Oskar Grönberg, Anders BMC Res Notes Technical Note BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer is common in humans where treatment involves surgical removal of the cancerous part of the intestines. In the anastomosis procedure a purse-string suture may be time consuming to perform. The aim was to replace the purse-string suture, to develop and test a self-locking loop for temporary sealing of the lumen in colon anastomosis. METHODS: A new device, a flexible band with a locking mechanism was constructed, the I-Tie(®). Small protrusions, designed for increased friction between device and tissue, were added to one side of the flexible band in order to enhance the grip at closure of the loop around tissue. The device was initially tested in vitro on pig intestines. In an in vivo study, the short-term implant was tested in a new suture-free method, CREX, and with traditional circular staplers for colonic anastomosis. Ten female pigs of approximately 50 kg were used in the in vivo test. The self-locking device was used for closure of the lumen around anvils in CREX (n = 5), and around anvil in traditional circular stapler anastomosis (n = 5). Two self-locking devices were used in each animal. RESULTS: The self-locking device could close the lumen of colon around the anvil and trocar. Subjectively, the device achieved a tight closure of the colon and did not interfere with the anastomosis techniques. CONCLUSIONS: The technology was perceived as potentially timesaving and easy to use. We conclude the device may be an alternative to the traditional purse-string suture for temporary closure of the colon lumen in colon anastomosis. BioMed Central 2017-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5299739/ /pubmed/28179015 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-017-2412-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Technical Note
Höglund, Odd V.
Maxon, Oskar
Grönberg, Anders
A self-locking loop as an alternative to purse-string suture in colon anastomosis: a feasibility study
title A self-locking loop as an alternative to purse-string suture in colon anastomosis: a feasibility study
title_full A self-locking loop as an alternative to purse-string suture in colon anastomosis: a feasibility study
title_fullStr A self-locking loop as an alternative to purse-string suture in colon anastomosis: a feasibility study
title_full_unstemmed A self-locking loop as an alternative to purse-string suture in colon anastomosis: a feasibility study
title_short A self-locking loop as an alternative to purse-string suture in colon anastomosis: a feasibility study
title_sort self-locking loop as an alternative to purse-string suture in colon anastomosis: a feasibility study
topic Technical Note
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5299739/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28179015
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-017-2412-4
work_keys_str_mv AT hoglundoddv aselflockingloopasanalternativetopursestringsutureincolonanastomosisafeasibilitystudy
AT maxonoskar aselflockingloopasanalternativetopursestringsutureincolonanastomosisafeasibilitystudy
AT gronberganders aselflockingloopasanalternativetopursestringsutureincolonanastomosisafeasibilitystudy
AT hoglundoddv selflockingloopasanalternativetopursestringsutureincolonanastomosisafeasibilitystudy
AT maxonoskar selflockingloopasanalternativetopursestringsutureincolonanastomosisafeasibilitystudy
AT gronberganders selflockingloopasanalternativetopursestringsutureincolonanastomosisafeasibilitystudy