Cargando…
Comparative host selection responses of specialist (Helicoverpa assulta) and generalist (Helicoverpa armigera) moths in complex plant environments
We tested the behavioral responses of ovipositing females and natal larvae of two sibling species, a generalist Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) and a specialist Helicoverpa assulta (Guenée), to odor sources emitted from different combinations of six plant species (tobacco, Nicotiana tabacum; hot peppe...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5300263/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28182679 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171948 |
_version_ | 1782506158802599936 |
---|---|
author | Li, Wei-zheng Teng, Xiao-hui Zhang, Hong-fei Liu, Ting Wang, Qiong Yuan, Guohui Guo, Xian-ru |
author_facet | Li, Wei-zheng Teng, Xiao-hui Zhang, Hong-fei Liu, Ting Wang, Qiong Yuan, Guohui Guo, Xian-ru |
author_sort | Li, Wei-zheng |
collection | PubMed |
description | We tested the behavioral responses of ovipositing females and natal larvae of two sibling species, a generalist Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) and a specialist Helicoverpa assulta (Guenée), to odor sources emitted from different combinations of six plant species (tobacco, Nicotiana tabacum; hot pepper, Capsicum annuum; tomato, Solanum esculentum; cotton, Gossypium hirsutum; peanut, Arachis hypogaea; maize, Zea mays). Under the conditions of plant materials versus corresponding controls, both stages of both species could find their corresponding host plants. However, H. assulta females and larvae exhibited a supersensitive and an insensitive response, respectively. Under the conditions of tobacco paired with each plant species, H. assulta females exhibited more specialized ovipositional response to tobacco than its sibling. When each plant species were combined with tobacco and tested against tobacco reference, peanut played an opposite role in the two species in their ovipositional responses to tobacco, and cotton can enhance the approaching response of H. armigera larvae when combined with tobacco. It seems that two attractive host plants also can act antagonistically with respect to host selection of the generalist via volatile exchange. Tomato should better be excluded from host list of H. assulta. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5300263 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53002632017-02-28 Comparative host selection responses of specialist (Helicoverpa assulta) and generalist (Helicoverpa armigera) moths in complex plant environments Li, Wei-zheng Teng, Xiao-hui Zhang, Hong-fei Liu, Ting Wang, Qiong Yuan, Guohui Guo, Xian-ru PLoS One Research Article We tested the behavioral responses of ovipositing females and natal larvae of two sibling species, a generalist Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) and a specialist Helicoverpa assulta (Guenée), to odor sources emitted from different combinations of six plant species (tobacco, Nicotiana tabacum; hot pepper, Capsicum annuum; tomato, Solanum esculentum; cotton, Gossypium hirsutum; peanut, Arachis hypogaea; maize, Zea mays). Under the conditions of plant materials versus corresponding controls, both stages of both species could find their corresponding host plants. However, H. assulta females and larvae exhibited a supersensitive and an insensitive response, respectively. Under the conditions of tobacco paired with each plant species, H. assulta females exhibited more specialized ovipositional response to tobacco than its sibling. When each plant species were combined with tobacco and tested against tobacco reference, peanut played an opposite role in the two species in their ovipositional responses to tobacco, and cotton can enhance the approaching response of H. armigera larvae when combined with tobacco. It seems that two attractive host plants also can act antagonistically with respect to host selection of the generalist via volatile exchange. Tomato should better be excluded from host list of H. assulta. Public Library of Science 2017-02-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5300263/ /pubmed/28182679 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171948 Text en © 2017 Li et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Li, Wei-zheng Teng, Xiao-hui Zhang, Hong-fei Liu, Ting Wang, Qiong Yuan, Guohui Guo, Xian-ru Comparative host selection responses of specialist (Helicoverpa assulta) and generalist (Helicoverpa armigera) moths in complex plant environments |
title | Comparative host selection responses of specialist (Helicoverpa assulta) and generalist (Helicoverpa armigera) moths in complex plant environments |
title_full | Comparative host selection responses of specialist (Helicoverpa assulta) and generalist (Helicoverpa armigera) moths in complex plant environments |
title_fullStr | Comparative host selection responses of specialist (Helicoverpa assulta) and generalist (Helicoverpa armigera) moths in complex plant environments |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative host selection responses of specialist (Helicoverpa assulta) and generalist (Helicoverpa armigera) moths in complex plant environments |
title_short | Comparative host selection responses of specialist (Helicoverpa assulta) and generalist (Helicoverpa armigera) moths in complex plant environments |
title_sort | comparative host selection responses of specialist (helicoverpa assulta) and generalist (helicoverpa armigera) moths in complex plant environments |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5300263/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28182679 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171948 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liweizheng comparativehostselectionresponsesofspecialisthelicoverpaassultaandgeneralisthelicoverpaarmigeramothsincomplexplantenvironments AT tengxiaohui comparativehostselectionresponsesofspecialisthelicoverpaassultaandgeneralisthelicoverpaarmigeramothsincomplexplantenvironments AT zhanghongfei comparativehostselectionresponsesofspecialisthelicoverpaassultaandgeneralisthelicoverpaarmigeramothsincomplexplantenvironments AT liuting comparativehostselectionresponsesofspecialisthelicoverpaassultaandgeneralisthelicoverpaarmigeramothsincomplexplantenvironments AT wangqiong comparativehostselectionresponsesofspecialisthelicoverpaassultaandgeneralisthelicoverpaarmigeramothsincomplexplantenvironments AT yuanguohui comparativehostselectionresponsesofspecialisthelicoverpaassultaandgeneralisthelicoverpaarmigeramothsincomplexplantenvironments AT guoxianru comparativehostselectionresponsesofspecialisthelicoverpaassultaandgeneralisthelicoverpaarmigeramothsincomplexplantenvironments |