Cargando…

Comparative host selection responses of specialist (Helicoverpa assulta) and generalist (Helicoverpa armigera) moths in complex plant environments

We tested the behavioral responses of ovipositing females and natal larvae of two sibling species, a generalist Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) and a specialist Helicoverpa assulta (Guenée), to odor sources emitted from different combinations of six plant species (tobacco, Nicotiana tabacum; hot peppe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Wei-zheng, Teng, Xiao-hui, Zhang, Hong-fei, Liu, Ting, Wang, Qiong, Yuan, Guohui, Guo, Xian-ru
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5300263/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28182679
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171948
_version_ 1782506158802599936
author Li, Wei-zheng
Teng, Xiao-hui
Zhang, Hong-fei
Liu, Ting
Wang, Qiong
Yuan, Guohui
Guo, Xian-ru
author_facet Li, Wei-zheng
Teng, Xiao-hui
Zhang, Hong-fei
Liu, Ting
Wang, Qiong
Yuan, Guohui
Guo, Xian-ru
author_sort Li, Wei-zheng
collection PubMed
description We tested the behavioral responses of ovipositing females and natal larvae of two sibling species, a generalist Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) and a specialist Helicoverpa assulta (Guenée), to odor sources emitted from different combinations of six plant species (tobacco, Nicotiana tabacum; hot pepper, Capsicum annuum; tomato, Solanum esculentum; cotton, Gossypium hirsutum; peanut, Arachis hypogaea; maize, Zea mays). Under the conditions of plant materials versus corresponding controls, both stages of both species could find their corresponding host plants. However, H. assulta females and larvae exhibited a supersensitive and an insensitive response, respectively. Under the conditions of tobacco paired with each plant species, H. assulta females exhibited more specialized ovipositional response to tobacco than its sibling. When each plant species were combined with tobacco and tested against tobacco reference, peanut played an opposite role in the two species in their ovipositional responses to tobacco, and cotton can enhance the approaching response of H. armigera larvae when combined with tobacco. It seems that two attractive host plants also can act antagonistically with respect to host selection of the generalist via volatile exchange. Tomato should better be excluded from host list of H. assulta.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5300263
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53002632017-02-28 Comparative host selection responses of specialist (Helicoverpa assulta) and generalist (Helicoverpa armigera) moths in complex plant environments Li, Wei-zheng Teng, Xiao-hui Zhang, Hong-fei Liu, Ting Wang, Qiong Yuan, Guohui Guo, Xian-ru PLoS One Research Article We tested the behavioral responses of ovipositing females and natal larvae of two sibling species, a generalist Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) and a specialist Helicoverpa assulta (Guenée), to odor sources emitted from different combinations of six plant species (tobacco, Nicotiana tabacum; hot pepper, Capsicum annuum; tomato, Solanum esculentum; cotton, Gossypium hirsutum; peanut, Arachis hypogaea; maize, Zea mays). Under the conditions of plant materials versus corresponding controls, both stages of both species could find their corresponding host plants. However, H. assulta females and larvae exhibited a supersensitive and an insensitive response, respectively. Under the conditions of tobacco paired with each plant species, H. assulta females exhibited more specialized ovipositional response to tobacco than its sibling. When each plant species were combined with tobacco and tested against tobacco reference, peanut played an opposite role in the two species in their ovipositional responses to tobacco, and cotton can enhance the approaching response of H. armigera larvae when combined with tobacco. It seems that two attractive host plants also can act antagonistically with respect to host selection of the generalist via volatile exchange. Tomato should better be excluded from host list of H. assulta. Public Library of Science 2017-02-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5300263/ /pubmed/28182679 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171948 Text en © 2017 Li et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Li, Wei-zheng
Teng, Xiao-hui
Zhang, Hong-fei
Liu, Ting
Wang, Qiong
Yuan, Guohui
Guo, Xian-ru
Comparative host selection responses of specialist (Helicoverpa assulta) and generalist (Helicoverpa armigera) moths in complex plant environments
title Comparative host selection responses of specialist (Helicoverpa assulta) and generalist (Helicoverpa armigera) moths in complex plant environments
title_full Comparative host selection responses of specialist (Helicoverpa assulta) and generalist (Helicoverpa armigera) moths in complex plant environments
title_fullStr Comparative host selection responses of specialist (Helicoverpa assulta) and generalist (Helicoverpa armigera) moths in complex plant environments
title_full_unstemmed Comparative host selection responses of specialist (Helicoverpa assulta) and generalist (Helicoverpa armigera) moths in complex plant environments
title_short Comparative host selection responses of specialist (Helicoverpa assulta) and generalist (Helicoverpa armigera) moths in complex plant environments
title_sort comparative host selection responses of specialist (helicoverpa assulta) and generalist (helicoverpa armigera) moths in complex plant environments
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5300263/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28182679
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171948
work_keys_str_mv AT liweizheng comparativehostselectionresponsesofspecialisthelicoverpaassultaandgeneralisthelicoverpaarmigeramothsincomplexplantenvironments
AT tengxiaohui comparativehostselectionresponsesofspecialisthelicoverpaassultaandgeneralisthelicoverpaarmigeramothsincomplexplantenvironments
AT zhanghongfei comparativehostselectionresponsesofspecialisthelicoverpaassultaandgeneralisthelicoverpaarmigeramothsincomplexplantenvironments
AT liuting comparativehostselectionresponsesofspecialisthelicoverpaassultaandgeneralisthelicoverpaarmigeramothsincomplexplantenvironments
AT wangqiong comparativehostselectionresponsesofspecialisthelicoverpaassultaandgeneralisthelicoverpaarmigeramothsincomplexplantenvironments
AT yuanguohui comparativehostselectionresponsesofspecialisthelicoverpaassultaandgeneralisthelicoverpaarmigeramothsincomplexplantenvironments
AT guoxianru comparativehostselectionresponsesofspecialisthelicoverpaassultaandgeneralisthelicoverpaarmigeramothsincomplexplantenvironments