Cargando…

Comparing the interface pressure redistribution of three different types of cushions: differences according to age groups and cushion preferences

[Purpose] The purpose of this study was to analyze the change in interface pressure redistribution of three different types of cushions sat on by individuals in their 20s and older than 60 years old. [Subjects and Methods] One hundred and eleven college students and 100 persons than 60 years old wer...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Park, Ji-Su, Lee, Sang-Heon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Society of Physical Therapy Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5300805/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28210039
http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.29.57
_version_ 1782506246065094656
author Park, Ji-Su
Lee, Sang-Heon
author_facet Park, Ji-Su
Lee, Sang-Heon
author_sort Park, Ji-Su
collection PubMed
description [Purpose] The purpose of this study was to analyze the change in interface pressure redistribution of three different types of cushions sat on by individuals in their 20s and older than 60 years old. [Subjects and Methods] One hundred and eleven college students and 100 persons than 60 years old were recruited. Sitting pressure redistribution was measured while subjects sat without cushions or on honeycomb, air, and memory foam cushions in that order. Subsequently, the cushion preference was measured. After obtaining all measurements, the mean total pressure and each quadrant’s mean and peak pressure were analyzed. [Results] The mean hip and the peak pressures were low in the group of females aged 60 years or older, and the highest in the group of males in their 20s. The hip pressure ratio was low in the groups of females in their 20s and 60 years or older, whereas the thigh pressure ratio was high in the same groups. The analysis of cushion preference showed that the groups of males (42.0%) and females (40.0%) in their 20s mostly preferred air cushion. The men (55.1%) and women (50.0%) aged 20 years or older selected honeycomb and air cushions as the first and third preferred cushions with a high response rate. [Conclusion] Our results indicate that gender and age should be considered when recommending appropriate pressure redistribution cushions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5300805
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher The Society of Physical Therapy Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53008052017-02-16 Comparing the interface pressure redistribution of three different types of cushions: differences according to age groups and cushion preferences Park, Ji-Su Lee, Sang-Heon J Phys Ther Sci Original Article [Purpose] The purpose of this study was to analyze the change in interface pressure redistribution of three different types of cushions sat on by individuals in their 20s and older than 60 years old. [Subjects and Methods] One hundred and eleven college students and 100 persons than 60 years old were recruited. Sitting pressure redistribution was measured while subjects sat without cushions or on honeycomb, air, and memory foam cushions in that order. Subsequently, the cushion preference was measured. After obtaining all measurements, the mean total pressure and each quadrant’s mean and peak pressure were analyzed. [Results] The mean hip and the peak pressures were low in the group of females aged 60 years or older, and the highest in the group of males in their 20s. The hip pressure ratio was low in the groups of females in their 20s and 60 years or older, whereas the thigh pressure ratio was high in the same groups. The analysis of cushion preference showed that the groups of males (42.0%) and females (40.0%) in their 20s mostly preferred air cushion. The men (55.1%) and women (50.0%) aged 20 years or older selected honeycomb and air cushions as the first and third preferred cushions with a high response rate. [Conclusion] Our results indicate that gender and age should be considered when recommending appropriate pressure redistribution cushions. The Society of Physical Therapy Science 2017-01-30 2017-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5300805/ /pubmed/28210039 http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.29.57 Text en 2017©by the Society of Physical Therapy Science. Published by IPEC Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (by-nc-nd) License.
spellingShingle Original Article
Park, Ji-Su
Lee, Sang-Heon
Comparing the interface pressure redistribution of three different types of cushions: differences according to age groups and cushion preferences
title Comparing the interface pressure redistribution of three different types of cushions: differences according to age groups and cushion preferences
title_full Comparing the interface pressure redistribution of three different types of cushions: differences according to age groups and cushion preferences
title_fullStr Comparing the interface pressure redistribution of three different types of cushions: differences according to age groups and cushion preferences
title_full_unstemmed Comparing the interface pressure redistribution of three different types of cushions: differences according to age groups and cushion preferences
title_short Comparing the interface pressure redistribution of three different types of cushions: differences according to age groups and cushion preferences
title_sort comparing the interface pressure redistribution of three different types of cushions: differences according to age groups and cushion preferences
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5300805/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28210039
http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.29.57
work_keys_str_mv AT parkjisu comparingtheinterfacepressureredistributionofthreedifferenttypesofcushionsdifferencesaccordingtoagegroupsandcushionpreferences
AT leesangheon comparingtheinterfacepressureredistributionofthreedifferenttypesofcushionsdifferencesaccordingtoagegroupsandcushionpreferences