Cargando…

Analysis of Bone Fixation Methods in Digital Replantation

BACKGROUND: Adequate fixation of replanted digits is essential not only for short-term healing but for long-term function. Various bony fixation methods using Kirschner (K-) and intraosseous wire are available in replantation. We examined clinical and radiographic outcomes of fixation methods on bon...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Seung Woo, Lee, Dong Chul, Kim, Jin Soo, Roh, Si Young, Lee, Kyung Jin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5300925/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28194348
http://dx.doi.org/10.5999/aps.2017.44.1.53
_version_ 1782506267073314816
author Lee, Seung Woo
Lee, Dong Chul
Kim, Jin Soo
Roh, Si Young
Lee, Kyung Jin
author_facet Lee, Seung Woo
Lee, Dong Chul
Kim, Jin Soo
Roh, Si Young
Lee, Kyung Jin
author_sort Lee, Seung Woo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Adequate fixation of replanted digits is essential not only for short-term healing but for long-term function. Various bony fixation methods using Kirschner (K-) and intraosseous wire are available in replantation. We examined clinical and radiographic outcomes of fixation methods on bone union after digital replantation. METHODS: A single institutional retrospective review identified 992 patients who had undergone 1,247 successful replantations between July 2009 and September 2015. Exclusion criteria included amputations of the distal phalanx, comminuted fractures, and intra-articular fractures. Patients were classified according to 5 categories of fixation methods: single K-wire, double longitudinal K-wires, cross K-wires, wire with, and wire without K-wire support. Bone union was evaluated by 5-month postoperative X-ray and fixation outcomes were compared across the 5 groups. RESULTS: The exclusion criteria were applied, and 88 patients with 103 replanted digits remained for analysis. Single K-wire fixation was used in 40 digits, double longitudinal K-wires in 30, and cross fixation in 14. Wire with and without K-wire support was required in 15 and 4 digits. Nonunion was observed in 32 digits (31.1%), of which 13 required additional operations such as bone graft or corrective osteotomy. The highest percent of nonunion was observed after cross fixation (35.7%) and the lowest after wire alone (25.0%). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, contrary to general knowledge, we found that single K-wire fixation was not associated with poorer outcomes. Successful bone union outcomes may be achieved by careful selection of bone fixation methods. This study provides useful information for planning bone fixation in digital replantation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5300925
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher The Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53009252017-02-13 Analysis of Bone Fixation Methods in Digital Replantation Lee, Seung Woo Lee, Dong Chul Kim, Jin Soo Roh, Si Young Lee, Kyung Jin Arch Plast Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: Adequate fixation of replanted digits is essential not only for short-term healing but for long-term function. Various bony fixation methods using Kirschner (K-) and intraosseous wire are available in replantation. We examined clinical and radiographic outcomes of fixation methods on bone union after digital replantation. METHODS: A single institutional retrospective review identified 992 patients who had undergone 1,247 successful replantations between July 2009 and September 2015. Exclusion criteria included amputations of the distal phalanx, comminuted fractures, and intra-articular fractures. Patients were classified according to 5 categories of fixation methods: single K-wire, double longitudinal K-wires, cross K-wires, wire with, and wire without K-wire support. Bone union was evaluated by 5-month postoperative X-ray and fixation outcomes were compared across the 5 groups. RESULTS: The exclusion criteria were applied, and 88 patients with 103 replanted digits remained for analysis. Single K-wire fixation was used in 40 digits, double longitudinal K-wires in 30, and cross fixation in 14. Wire with and without K-wire support was required in 15 and 4 digits. Nonunion was observed in 32 digits (31.1%), of which 13 required additional operations such as bone graft or corrective osteotomy. The highest percent of nonunion was observed after cross fixation (35.7%) and the lowest after wire alone (25.0%). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, contrary to general knowledge, we found that single K-wire fixation was not associated with poorer outcomes. Successful bone union outcomes may be achieved by careful selection of bone fixation methods. This study provides useful information for planning bone fixation in digital replantation. The Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons 2017-01 2017-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5300925/ /pubmed/28194348 http://dx.doi.org/10.5999/aps.2017.44.1.53 Text en Copyright © 2017 The Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Lee, Seung Woo
Lee, Dong Chul
Kim, Jin Soo
Roh, Si Young
Lee, Kyung Jin
Analysis of Bone Fixation Methods in Digital Replantation
title Analysis of Bone Fixation Methods in Digital Replantation
title_full Analysis of Bone Fixation Methods in Digital Replantation
title_fullStr Analysis of Bone Fixation Methods in Digital Replantation
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of Bone Fixation Methods in Digital Replantation
title_short Analysis of Bone Fixation Methods in Digital Replantation
title_sort analysis of bone fixation methods in digital replantation
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5300925/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28194348
http://dx.doi.org/10.5999/aps.2017.44.1.53
work_keys_str_mv AT leeseungwoo analysisofbonefixationmethodsindigitalreplantation
AT leedongchul analysisofbonefixationmethodsindigitalreplantation
AT kimjinsoo analysisofbonefixationmethodsindigitalreplantation
AT rohsiyoung analysisofbonefixationmethodsindigitalreplantation
AT leekyungjin analysisofbonefixationmethodsindigitalreplantation