Cargando…
Social engineering of societal knowledge in livestock science: Can we be more empathetic?
Questions are raised in effective utilization of farmer’s wisdom by communities in their farming. Planners support to livelihood emphasize mostly of inputs from outside and not setting up sustainable goals. Formal institutions and planners of program are finding constraints and sceptical in wider di...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Veterinary World
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5301184/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28246452 http://dx.doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2017.86-91 |
_version_ | 1782506314819174400 |
---|---|
author | Ravikumar, R. K. Thakur, Devesh Choudhary, Hardev Kumar, Vivek Kinhekar, Amol S. Garg, Tushar Ponnusamy, K. Bhojne, G. R. Shetty, Vasanth M. Kumar, Vipin |
author_facet | Ravikumar, R. K. Thakur, Devesh Choudhary, Hardev Kumar, Vivek Kinhekar, Amol S. Garg, Tushar Ponnusamy, K. Bhojne, G. R. Shetty, Vasanth M. Kumar, Vipin |
author_sort | Ravikumar, R. K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Questions are raised in effective utilization of farmer’s wisdom by communities in their farming. Planners support to livelihood emphasize mostly of inputs from outside and not setting up sustainable goals. Formal institutions and planners of program are finding constraints and sceptical in wider dissemination of indigenous knowledge research system (IKRS). This is in spite of evidence that considerable number of farmer’s in livestock sector depends on IKRS. In this context, it is pertinent to showcase dissemination potential of these knowledge system(s) in larger geographical areas. The review illustrates different challenges encountered while control of livestock ailments like ectoparasite infestation through IKRS. Several times, it was opinioned to provide or share IKRS to thwart ailments in a specific region. This is interesting as it was narrated how formal system is unable to recognize farmer’s problem and challenges in integrating these sustainable practices. It has to be noted that disseminating activities seldom takes into account the experimental potential of farmers. This review paper articulates various evidences generated in enhancing diffusion thereby dissemination of IKRS. The nature of support extended by IKRS in entrepreneurial activity of smallholder farming units did not get adequate recognition. There needs to be minimum standard protocol in deriving benefit from such low-cost alternative technologies. This will enrich incremental innovation activities as per location specific need and provide scope for wider dissemination. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5301184 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Veterinary World |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53011842017-02-28 Social engineering of societal knowledge in livestock science: Can we be more empathetic? Ravikumar, R. K. Thakur, Devesh Choudhary, Hardev Kumar, Vivek Kinhekar, Amol S. Garg, Tushar Ponnusamy, K. Bhojne, G. R. Shetty, Vasanth M. Kumar, Vipin Vet World Review Article Questions are raised in effective utilization of farmer’s wisdom by communities in their farming. Planners support to livelihood emphasize mostly of inputs from outside and not setting up sustainable goals. Formal institutions and planners of program are finding constraints and sceptical in wider dissemination of indigenous knowledge research system (IKRS). This is in spite of evidence that considerable number of farmer’s in livestock sector depends on IKRS. In this context, it is pertinent to showcase dissemination potential of these knowledge system(s) in larger geographical areas. The review illustrates different challenges encountered while control of livestock ailments like ectoparasite infestation through IKRS. Several times, it was opinioned to provide or share IKRS to thwart ailments in a specific region. This is interesting as it was narrated how formal system is unable to recognize farmer’s problem and challenges in integrating these sustainable practices. It has to be noted that disseminating activities seldom takes into account the experimental potential of farmers. This review paper articulates various evidences generated in enhancing diffusion thereby dissemination of IKRS. The nature of support extended by IKRS in entrepreneurial activity of smallholder farming units did not get adequate recognition. There needs to be minimum standard protocol in deriving benefit from such low-cost alternative technologies. This will enrich incremental innovation activities as per location specific need and provide scope for wider dissemination. Veterinary World 2017-01 2017-01-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5301184/ /pubmed/28246452 http://dx.doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2017.86-91 Text en Copyright: © Ravikumar, et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 Open Access. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Ravikumar, R. K. Thakur, Devesh Choudhary, Hardev Kumar, Vivek Kinhekar, Amol S. Garg, Tushar Ponnusamy, K. Bhojne, G. R. Shetty, Vasanth M. Kumar, Vipin Social engineering of societal knowledge in livestock science: Can we be more empathetic? |
title | Social engineering of societal knowledge in livestock science: Can we be more empathetic? |
title_full | Social engineering of societal knowledge in livestock science: Can we be more empathetic? |
title_fullStr | Social engineering of societal knowledge in livestock science: Can we be more empathetic? |
title_full_unstemmed | Social engineering of societal knowledge in livestock science: Can we be more empathetic? |
title_short | Social engineering of societal knowledge in livestock science: Can we be more empathetic? |
title_sort | social engineering of societal knowledge in livestock science: can we be more empathetic? |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5301184/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28246452 http://dx.doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2017.86-91 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ravikumarrk socialengineeringofsocietalknowledgeinlivestocksciencecanwebemoreempathetic AT thakurdevesh socialengineeringofsocietalknowledgeinlivestocksciencecanwebemoreempathetic AT choudharyhardev socialengineeringofsocietalknowledgeinlivestocksciencecanwebemoreempathetic AT kumarvivek socialengineeringofsocietalknowledgeinlivestocksciencecanwebemoreempathetic AT kinhekaramols socialengineeringofsocietalknowledgeinlivestocksciencecanwebemoreempathetic AT gargtushar socialengineeringofsocietalknowledgeinlivestocksciencecanwebemoreempathetic AT ponnusamyk socialengineeringofsocietalknowledgeinlivestocksciencecanwebemoreempathetic AT bhojnegr socialengineeringofsocietalknowledgeinlivestocksciencecanwebemoreempathetic AT shettyvasanthm socialengineeringofsocietalknowledgeinlivestocksciencecanwebemoreempathetic AT kumarvipin socialengineeringofsocietalknowledgeinlivestocksciencecanwebemoreempathetic |