Cargando…

Social engineering of societal knowledge in livestock science: Can we be more empathetic?

Questions are raised in effective utilization of farmer’s wisdom by communities in their farming. Planners support to livelihood emphasize mostly of inputs from outside and not setting up sustainable goals. Formal institutions and planners of program are finding constraints and sceptical in wider di...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ravikumar, R. K., Thakur, Devesh, Choudhary, Hardev, Kumar, Vivek, Kinhekar, Amol S., Garg, Tushar, Ponnusamy, K., Bhojne, G. R., Shetty, Vasanth M., Kumar, Vipin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Veterinary World 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5301184/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28246452
http://dx.doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2017.86-91
_version_ 1782506314819174400
author Ravikumar, R. K.
Thakur, Devesh
Choudhary, Hardev
Kumar, Vivek
Kinhekar, Amol S.
Garg, Tushar
Ponnusamy, K.
Bhojne, G. R.
Shetty, Vasanth M.
Kumar, Vipin
author_facet Ravikumar, R. K.
Thakur, Devesh
Choudhary, Hardev
Kumar, Vivek
Kinhekar, Amol S.
Garg, Tushar
Ponnusamy, K.
Bhojne, G. R.
Shetty, Vasanth M.
Kumar, Vipin
author_sort Ravikumar, R. K.
collection PubMed
description Questions are raised in effective utilization of farmer’s wisdom by communities in their farming. Planners support to livelihood emphasize mostly of inputs from outside and not setting up sustainable goals. Formal institutions and planners of program are finding constraints and sceptical in wider dissemination of indigenous knowledge research system (IKRS). This is in spite of evidence that considerable number of farmer’s in livestock sector depends on IKRS. In this context, it is pertinent to showcase dissemination potential of these knowledge system(s) in larger geographical areas. The review illustrates different challenges encountered while control of livestock ailments like ectoparasite infestation through IKRS. Several times, it was opinioned to provide or share IKRS to thwart ailments in a specific region. This is interesting as it was narrated how formal system is unable to recognize farmer’s problem and challenges in integrating these sustainable practices. It has to be noted that disseminating activities seldom takes into account the experimental potential of farmers. This review paper articulates various evidences generated in enhancing diffusion thereby dissemination of IKRS. The nature of support extended by IKRS in entrepreneurial activity of smallholder farming units did not get adequate recognition. There needs to be minimum standard protocol in deriving benefit from such low-cost alternative technologies. This will enrich incremental innovation activities as per location specific need and provide scope for wider dissemination.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5301184
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Veterinary World
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53011842017-02-28 Social engineering of societal knowledge in livestock science: Can we be more empathetic? Ravikumar, R. K. Thakur, Devesh Choudhary, Hardev Kumar, Vivek Kinhekar, Amol S. Garg, Tushar Ponnusamy, K. Bhojne, G. R. Shetty, Vasanth M. Kumar, Vipin Vet World Review Article Questions are raised in effective utilization of farmer’s wisdom by communities in their farming. Planners support to livelihood emphasize mostly of inputs from outside and not setting up sustainable goals. Formal institutions and planners of program are finding constraints and sceptical in wider dissemination of indigenous knowledge research system (IKRS). This is in spite of evidence that considerable number of farmer’s in livestock sector depends on IKRS. In this context, it is pertinent to showcase dissemination potential of these knowledge system(s) in larger geographical areas. The review illustrates different challenges encountered while control of livestock ailments like ectoparasite infestation through IKRS. Several times, it was opinioned to provide or share IKRS to thwart ailments in a specific region. This is interesting as it was narrated how formal system is unable to recognize farmer’s problem and challenges in integrating these sustainable practices. It has to be noted that disseminating activities seldom takes into account the experimental potential of farmers. This review paper articulates various evidences generated in enhancing diffusion thereby dissemination of IKRS. The nature of support extended by IKRS in entrepreneurial activity of smallholder farming units did not get adequate recognition. There needs to be minimum standard protocol in deriving benefit from such low-cost alternative technologies. This will enrich incremental innovation activities as per location specific need and provide scope for wider dissemination. Veterinary World 2017-01 2017-01-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5301184/ /pubmed/28246452 http://dx.doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2017.86-91 Text en Copyright: © Ravikumar, et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 Open Access. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Review Article
Ravikumar, R. K.
Thakur, Devesh
Choudhary, Hardev
Kumar, Vivek
Kinhekar, Amol S.
Garg, Tushar
Ponnusamy, K.
Bhojne, G. R.
Shetty, Vasanth M.
Kumar, Vipin
Social engineering of societal knowledge in livestock science: Can we be more empathetic?
title Social engineering of societal knowledge in livestock science: Can we be more empathetic?
title_full Social engineering of societal knowledge in livestock science: Can we be more empathetic?
title_fullStr Social engineering of societal knowledge in livestock science: Can we be more empathetic?
title_full_unstemmed Social engineering of societal knowledge in livestock science: Can we be more empathetic?
title_short Social engineering of societal knowledge in livestock science: Can we be more empathetic?
title_sort social engineering of societal knowledge in livestock science: can we be more empathetic?
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5301184/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28246452
http://dx.doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2017.86-91
work_keys_str_mv AT ravikumarrk socialengineeringofsocietalknowledgeinlivestocksciencecanwebemoreempathetic
AT thakurdevesh socialengineeringofsocietalknowledgeinlivestocksciencecanwebemoreempathetic
AT choudharyhardev socialengineeringofsocietalknowledgeinlivestocksciencecanwebemoreempathetic
AT kumarvivek socialengineeringofsocietalknowledgeinlivestocksciencecanwebemoreempathetic
AT kinhekaramols socialengineeringofsocietalknowledgeinlivestocksciencecanwebemoreempathetic
AT gargtushar socialengineeringofsocietalknowledgeinlivestocksciencecanwebemoreempathetic
AT ponnusamyk socialengineeringofsocietalknowledgeinlivestocksciencecanwebemoreempathetic
AT bhojnegr socialengineeringofsocietalknowledgeinlivestocksciencecanwebemoreempathetic
AT shettyvasanthm socialengineeringofsocietalknowledgeinlivestocksciencecanwebemoreempathetic
AT kumarvipin socialengineeringofsocietalknowledgeinlivestocksciencecanwebemoreempathetic