Cargando…

The immune response to 6-monthly versus annual standard dose inactivated trivalent influenza vaccination in older people: study protocol for a randomised clinical trial

BACKGROUND: The seasonal influenza vaccine is less effective in older people and a single dose is unlikely to provide the year-round protection necessary for tropical climates which have year-round influenza virus activity. This study aims to assess the effect of a trivalent inactivated influenza va...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Young, Barnaby, Sadarangani, Sapna, Yew, Haur Sen, Yung, Chee Fu, Leo, Yee Sin, Chen, Mark I-Cheng, Wilder-Smith, Annelies
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5301431/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28183326
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-1808-8
_version_ 1782506364068691968
author Young, Barnaby
Sadarangani, Sapna
Yew, Haur Sen
Yung, Chee Fu
Leo, Yee Sin
Chen, Mark I-Cheng
Wilder-Smith, Annelies
author_facet Young, Barnaby
Sadarangani, Sapna
Yew, Haur Sen
Yung, Chee Fu
Leo, Yee Sin
Chen, Mark I-Cheng
Wilder-Smith, Annelies
author_sort Young, Barnaby
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The seasonal influenza vaccine is less effective in older people and a single dose is unlikely to provide the year-round protection necessary for tropical climates which have year-round influenza virus activity. This study aims to assess the effect of a trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV3) booster at 180 days on haemagglutination-inhibition (HI) antibody titres for each of the influenza strains present in the administered vaccine in older people aged 65 years or above in Singapore. METHODS/DESIGN: This is a single-centre, randomised, observer-blind, active-comparator controlled, parallel-group, phase IV trial in 200 adults aged 65 years or older. Study participants will be assigned to one of two groups in a 1:1 ratio and followed for 1 year, with five scheduled visits. The control group will receive IIV3 at day 1, and an active comparator (Tetanus-diphtheria-pertussis vaccine) at day 180. Participants in the experimental group will receive IIV3 containing the same strains at day 1 and day 180. Endpoints are immunological, and include measures of HI titres, microneutralisation titres (MN) and cell-mediated immunity from first vaccination up to day 360. DISCUSSION: If superiority of 6-monthly influenza vaccination is demonstrated, this study could form the basis for a larger clinical trial with influenza infection as the primary endpoint. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT02655874. Registered on 12 January 2016. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-017-1808-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5301431
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53014312017-02-15 The immune response to 6-monthly versus annual standard dose inactivated trivalent influenza vaccination in older people: study protocol for a randomised clinical trial Young, Barnaby Sadarangani, Sapna Yew, Haur Sen Yung, Chee Fu Leo, Yee Sin Chen, Mark I-Cheng Wilder-Smith, Annelies Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: The seasonal influenza vaccine is less effective in older people and a single dose is unlikely to provide the year-round protection necessary for tropical climates which have year-round influenza virus activity. This study aims to assess the effect of a trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV3) booster at 180 days on haemagglutination-inhibition (HI) antibody titres for each of the influenza strains present in the administered vaccine in older people aged 65 years or above in Singapore. METHODS/DESIGN: This is a single-centre, randomised, observer-blind, active-comparator controlled, parallel-group, phase IV trial in 200 adults aged 65 years or older. Study participants will be assigned to one of two groups in a 1:1 ratio and followed for 1 year, with five scheduled visits. The control group will receive IIV3 at day 1, and an active comparator (Tetanus-diphtheria-pertussis vaccine) at day 180. Participants in the experimental group will receive IIV3 containing the same strains at day 1 and day 180. Endpoints are immunological, and include measures of HI titres, microneutralisation titres (MN) and cell-mediated immunity from first vaccination up to day 360. DISCUSSION: If superiority of 6-monthly influenza vaccination is demonstrated, this study could form the basis for a larger clinical trial with influenza infection as the primary endpoint. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT02655874. Registered on 12 January 2016. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-017-1808-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5301431/ /pubmed/28183326 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-1808-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Young, Barnaby
Sadarangani, Sapna
Yew, Haur Sen
Yung, Chee Fu
Leo, Yee Sin
Chen, Mark I-Cheng
Wilder-Smith, Annelies
The immune response to 6-monthly versus annual standard dose inactivated trivalent influenza vaccination in older people: study protocol for a randomised clinical trial
title The immune response to 6-monthly versus annual standard dose inactivated trivalent influenza vaccination in older people: study protocol for a randomised clinical trial
title_full The immune response to 6-monthly versus annual standard dose inactivated trivalent influenza vaccination in older people: study protocol for a randomised clinical trial
title_fullStr The immune response to 6-monthly versus annual standard dose inactivated trivalent influenza vaccination in older people: study protocol for a randomised clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed The immune response to 6-monthly versus annual standard dose inactivated trivalent influenza vaccination in older people: study protocol for a randomised clinical trial
title_short The immune response to 6-monthly versus annual standard dose inactivated trivalent influenza vaccination in older people: study protocol for a randomised clinical trial
title_sort immune response to 6-monthly versus annual standard dose inactivated trivalent influenza vaccination in older people: study protocol for a randomised clinical trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5301431/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28183326
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-1808-8
work_keys_str_mv AT youngbarnaby theimmuneresponseto6monthlyversusannualstandarddoseinactivatedtrivalentinfluenzavaccinationinolderpeoplestudyprotocolforarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT sadaranganisapna theimmuneresponseto6monthlyversusannualstandarddoseinactivatedtrivalentinfluenzavaccinationinolderpeoplestudyprotocolforarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT yewhaursen theimmuneresponseto6monthlyversusannualstandarddoseinactivatedtrivalentinfluenzavaccinationinolderpeoplestudyprotocolforarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT yungcheefu theimmuneresponseto6monthlyversusannualstandarddoseinactivatedtrivalentinfluenzavaccinationinolderpeoplestudyprotocolforarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT leoyeesin theimmuneresponseto6monthlyversusannualstandarddoseinactivatedtrivalentinfluenzavaccinationinolderpeoplestudyprotocolforarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT chenmarkicheng theimmuneresponseto6monthlyversusannualstandarddoseinactivatedtrivalentinfluenzavaccinationinolderpeoplestudyprotocolforarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT wildersmithannelies theimmuneresponseto6monthlyversusannualstandarddoseinactivatedtrivalentinfluenzavaccinationinolderpeoplestudyprotocolforarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT youngbarnaby immuneresponseto6monthlyversusannualstandarddoseinactivatedtrivalentinfluenzavaccinationinolderpeoplestudyprotocolforarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT sadaranganisapna immuneresponseto6monthlyversusannualstandarddoseinactivatedtrivalentinfluenzavaccinationinolderpeoplestudyprotocolforarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT yewhaursen immuneresponseto6monthlyversusannualstandarddoseinactivatedtrivalentinfluenzavaccinationinolderpeoplestudyprotocolforarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT yungcheefu immuneresponseto6monthlyversusannualstandarddoseinactivatedtrivalentinfluenzavaccinationinolderpeoplestudyprotocolforarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT leoyeesin immuneresponseto6monthlyversusannualstandarddoseinactivatedtrivalentinfluenzavaccinationinolderpeoplestudyprotocolforarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT chenmarkicheng immuneresponseto6monthlyversusannualstandarddoseinactivatedtrivalentinfluenzavaccinationinolderpeoplestudyprotocolforarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT wildersmithannelies immuneresponseto6monthlyversusannualstandarddoseinactivatedtrivalentinfluenzavaccinationinolderpeoplestudyprotocolforarandomisedclinicaltrial