Cargando…

Metal-backed versus all-polyethylene unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: Proximal tibial strain in an experimentally validated finite element model

OBJECTIVES: Up to 40% of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) revisions are performed for unexplained pain which may be caused by elevated proximal tibial bone strain. This study investigates the effect of tibial component metal backing and polyethylene thickness on bone strain in a cemented fix...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Scott, C. E. H., Eaton, M. J., Nutton, R. W., Wade, F. A., Evans, S. L., Pankaj, P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5301904/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28077394
http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.61.BJR-2016-0142.R1
_version_ 1782506444746129408
author Scott, C. E. H.
Eaton, M. J.
Nutton, R. W.
Wade, F. A.
Evans, S. L.
Pankaj, P.
author_facet Scott, C. E. H.
Eaton, M. J.
Nutton, R. W.
Wade, F. A.
Evans, S. L.
Pankaj, P.
author_sort Scott, C. E. H.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Up to 40% of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) revisions are performed for unexplained pain which may be caused by elevated proximal tibial bone strain. This study investigates the effect of tibial component metal backing and polyethylene thickness on bone strain in a cemented fixed-bearing medial UKA using a finite element model (FEM) validated experimentally by digital image correlation (DIC) and acoustic emission (AE). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of ten composite tibias implanted with all-polyethylene (AP) and metal-backed (MB) tibial components were loaded to 2500 N. Cortical strain was measured using DIC and cancellous microdamage using AE. FEMs were created and validated and polyethylene thickness varied from 6 mm to 10 mm. The volume of cancellous bone exposed to < -3000 µε (pathological loading) and < -7000 µε (yield point) minimum principal (compressive) microstrain and > 3000 µε and > 7000 µε maximum principal (tensile) microstrain was computed. RESULTS: Experimental AE data and the FEM volume of cancellous bone with compressive strain < -3000 µε correlated strongly: R = 0.947, R(2) = 0.847, percentage error 12.5% (p < 0.001). DIC and FEM data correlated: R = 0.838, R(2) = 0.702, percentage error 4.5% (p < 0.001). FEM strain patterns included MB lateral edge concentrations; AP concentrations at keel, peg and at the region of load application. Cancellous strains were higher in AP implants at all loads: 2.2- (10 mm) to 3.2-times (6 mm) the volume of cancellous bone compressively strained < -7000 µε. CONCLUSION: AP tibial components display greater volumes of pathologically overstrained cancellous bone than MB implants of the same geometry. Increasing AP thickness does not overcome these pathological forces and comes at the cost of greater bone resection. Cite this article: C. E. H. Scott, M. J. Eaton, R. W. Nutton, F. A. Wade, S. L. Evans, P. Pankaj. Metal-backed versus all-polyethylene unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: Proximal tibial strain in an experimentally validated finite element model. Bone Joint Res 2017;6:22–30. DOI:10.1302/2046-3758.61.BJR-2016-0142.R1
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5301904
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53019042017-02-15 Metal-backed versus all-polyethylene unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: Proximal tibial strain in an experimentally validated finite element model Scott, C. E. H. Eaton, M. J. Nutton, R. W. Wade, F. A. Evans, S. L. Pankaj, P. Bone Joint Res Knee OBJECTIVES: Up to 40% of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) revisions are performed for unexplained pain which may be caused by elevated proximal tibial bone strain. This study investigates the effect of tibial component metal backing and polyethylene thickness on bone strain in a cemented fixed-bearing medial UKA using a finite element model (FEM) validated experimentally by digital image correlation (DIC) and acoustic emission (AE). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of ten composite tibias implanted with all-polyethylene (AP) and metal-backed (MB) tibial components were loaded to 2500 N. Cortical strain was measured using DIC and cancellous microdamage using AE. FEMs were created and validated and polyethylene thickness varied from 6 mm to 10 mm. The volume of cancellous bone exposed to < -3000 µε (pathological loading) and < -7000 µε (yield point) minimum principal (compressive) microstrain and > 3000 µε and > 7000 µε maximum principal (tensile) microstrain was computed. RESULTS: Experimental AE data and the FEM volume of cancellous bone with compressive strain < -3000 µε correlated strongly: R = 0.947, R(2) = 0.847, percentage error 12.5% (p < 0.001). DIC and FEM data correlated: R = 0.838, R(2) = 0.702, percentage error 4.5% (p < 0.001). FEM strain patterns included MB lateral edge concentrations; AP concentrations at keel, peg and at the region of load application. Cancellous strains were higher in AP implants at all loads: 2.2- (10 mm) to 3.2-times (6 mm) the volume of cancellous bone compressively strained < -7000 µε. CONCLUSION: AP tibial components display greater volumes of pathologically overstrained cancellous bone than MB implants of the same geometry. Increasing AP thickness does not overcome these pathological forces and comes at the cost of greater bone resection. Cite this article: C. E. H. Scott, M. J. Eaton, R. W. Nutton, F. A. Wade, S. L. Evans, P. Pankaj. Metal-backed versus all-polyethylene unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: Proximal tibial strain in an experimentally validated finite element model. Bone Joint Res 2017;6:22–30. DOI:10.1302/2046-3758.61.BJR-2016-0142.R1 2017-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5301904/ /pubmed/28077394 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.61.BJR-2016-0142.R1 Text en © 2017 Scott et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attributions licence (CC-BY-NC), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, but not for commercial gain, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Knee
Scott, C. E. H.
Eaton, M. J.
Nutton, R. W.
Wade, F. A.
Evans, S. L.
Pankaj, P.
Metal-backed versus all-polyethylene unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: Proximal tibial strain in an experimentally validated finite element model
title Metal-backed versus all-polyethylene unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: Proximal tibial strain in an experimentally validated finite element model
title_full Metal-backed versus all-polyethylene unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: Proximal tibial strain in an experimentally validated finite element model
title_fullStr Metal-backed versus all-polyethylene unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: Proximal tibial strain in an experimentally validated finite element model
title_full_unstemmed Metal-backed versus all-polyethylene unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: Proximal tibial strain in an experimentally validated finite element model
title_short Metal-backed versus all-polyethylene unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: Proximal tibial strain in an experimentally validated finite element model
title_sort metal-backed versus all-polyethylene unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: proximal tibial strain in an experimentally validated finite element model
topic Knee
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5301904/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28077394
http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.61.BJR-2016-0142.R1
work_keys_str_mv AT scottceh metalbackedversusallpolyethyleneunicompartmentalkneearthroplastyproximaltibialstraininanexperimentallyvalidatedfiniteelementmodel
AT eatonmj metalbackedversusallpolyethyleneunicompartmentalkneearthroplastyproximaltibialstraininanexperimentallyvalidatedfiniteelementmodel
AT nuttonrw metalbackedversusallpolyethyleneunicompartmentalkneearthroplastyproximaltibialstraininanexperimentallyvalidatedfiniteelementmodel
AT wadefa metalbackedversusallpolyethyleneunicompartmentalkneearthroplastyproximaltibialstraininanexperimentallyvalidatedfiniteelementmodel
AT evanssl metalbackedversusallpolyethyleneunicompartmentalkneearthroplastyproximaltibialstraininanexperimentallyvalidatedfiniteelementmodel
AT pankajp metalbackedversusallpolyethyleneunicompartmentalkneearthroplastyproximaltibialstraininanexperimentallyvalidatedfiniteelementmodel