Cargando…

Anti-predator meshing may provide greater protection for sea turtle nests than predator removal

The problem of how to protect sea turtle nests from terrestrial predators is of worldwide concern. On Queensland’s southern Sunshine Coast, depredation of turtle nests by the introduced European red fox (Vulpes vulpes) has been recorded as the primary terrestrial cause of egg and hatchling mortality...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: O’Connor, Julie M., Limpus, Colin J., Hofmeister, Kate M., Allen, Benjamin L., Burnett, Scott E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5302370/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28187181
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171831
_version_ 1782506528917422080
author O’Connor, Julie M.
Limpus, Colin J.
Hofmeister, Kate M.
Allen, Benjamin L.
Burnett, Scott E.
author_facet O’Connor, Julie M.
Limpus, Colin J.
Hofmeister, Kate M.
Allen, Benjamin L.
Burnett, Scott E.
author_sort O’Connor, Julie M.
collection PubMed
description The problem of how to protect sea turtle nests from terrestrial predators is of worldwide concern. On Queensland’s southern Sunshine Coast, depredation of turtle nests by the introduced European red fox (Vulpes vulpes) has been recorded as the primary terrestrial cause of egg and hatchling mortality. We investigated the impact of foxes on the nests of the loggerhead turtle (Caretta caretta) and occasional green turtle (Chelonia mydas) over ten nesting seasons. Meshing of nests with fox exclusion devices (FEDs) was undertaken in all years accompanied by lethal fox control in the first five-year period, but not in the second five-year period. Lethal fox control was undertaken in the study area from 2005 to February 2010, but foxes still breached 27% (range19–52%) of turtle nests. In the second five-year period, despite the absence of lethal fox control, the average percentage of nests breached was less than 3% (range 0–4%). Comparison of clutch depredation rates in the two five-year periods demonstrated that continuous nest meshing may be more effective than lethal fox control in mitigating the impact of foxes on turtle nests. In the absence of unlimited resources available for the eradication of exotic predators, the use of FEDs and the support and resourcing of a dedicated volunteer base can be considered an effective turtle conservation tool on some beaches.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5302370
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53023702017-02-28 Anti-predator meshing may provide greater protection for sea turtle nests than predator removal O’Connor, Julie M. Limpus, Colin J. Hofmeister, Kate M. Allen, Benjamin L. Burnett, Scott E. PLoS One Research Article The problem of how to protect sea turtle nests from terrestrial predators is of worldwide concern. On Queensland’s southern Sunshine Coast, depredation of turtle nests by the introduced European red fox (Vulpes vulpes) has been recorded as the primary terrestrial cause of egg and hatchling mortality. We investigated the impact of foxes on the nests of the loggerhead turtle (Caretta caretta) and occasional green turtle (Chelonia mydas) over ten nesting seasons. Meshing of nests with fox exclusion devices (FEDs) was undertaken in all years accompanied by lethal fox control in the first five-year period, but not in the second five-year period. Lethal fox control was undertaken in the study area from 2005 to February 2010, but foxes still breached 27% (range19–52%) of turtle nests. In the second five-year period, despite the absence of lethal fox control, the average percentage of nests breached was less than 3% (range 0–4%). Comparison of clutch depredation rates in the two five-year periods demonstrated that continuous nest meshing may be more effective than lethal fox control in mitigating the impact of foxes on turtle nests. In the absence of unlimited resources available for the eradication of exotic predators, the use of FEDs and the support and resourcing of a dedicated volunteer base can be considered an effective turtle conservation tool on some beaches. Public Library of Science 2017-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5302370/ /pubmed/28187181 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171831 Text en © 2017 O’Connor et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
O’Connor, Julie M.
Limpus, Colin J.
Hofmeister, Kate M.
Allen, Benjamin L.
Burnett, Scott E.
Anti-predator meshing may provide greater protection for sea turtle nests than predator removal
title Anti-predator meshing may provide greater protection for sea turtle nests than predator removal
title_full Anti-predator meshing may provide greater protection for sea turtle nests than predator removal
title_fullStr Anti-predator meshing may provide greater protection for sea turtle nests than predator removal
title_full_unstemmed Anti-predator meshing may provide greater protection for sea turtle nests than predator removal
title_short Anti-predator meshing may provide greater protection for sea turtle nests than predator removal
title_sort anti-predator meshing may provide greater protection for sea turtle nests than predator removal
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5302370/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28187181
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171831
work_keys_str_mv AT oconnorjuliem antipredatormeshingmayprovidegreaterprotectionforseaturtleneststhanpredatorremoval
AT limpuscolinj antipredatormeshingmayprovidegreaterprotectionforseaturtleneststhanpredatorremoval
AT hofmeisterkatem antipredatormeshingmayprovidegreaterprotectionforseaturtleneststhanpredatorremoval
AT allenbenjaminl antipredatormeshingmayprovidegreaterprotectionforseaturtleneststhanpredatorremoval
AT burnettscotte antipredatormeshingmayprovidegreaterprotectionforseaturtleneststhanpredatorremoval