Insights From the Diabetes in India Nutrition Guidelines Study: Adopting Innovations Using a Knowledge Transfer Model

This 12-month prospective randomized cluster trial of 20 dietitians in India compared usual care (UC) and evidence-based nutrition practice guideline (EBNPG) care for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Baseline, 6-month, and 12-month data from 238 patients were analyzed. EBNPG implementation wa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Myers, Esther F., Trostler, Naomi, Varsha, V., Voet, Hillary
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2017
Materias:
Clinical Practice Projects
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5302411/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28232773
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/TIN.0000000000000089
Descripción
Sumario:This 12-month prospective randomized cluster trial of 20 dietitians in India compared usual care (UC) and evidence-based nutrition practice guideline (EBNPG) care for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Baseline, 6-month, and 12-month data from 238 patients were analyzed. EBNPG implementation was evaluated using the Ottawa Model for Knowledge Transfer. EBNPG and UC groups achieved significant hemoglobin A(1C) improvements. EBNPG-treated participants were significantly more likely to meet low-density lipoprotein, high-density lipoprotein, and triglyceride goals at 6 or 12 months. Dietitian dropout, implementation barriers, and undetermined EBNPG intervention fidelity are limitations. Future research should assess barriers/supports and degree of EBNPG use.

Ejemplares similares