Cargando…

Health Reform in Minnesota: An Analysis of Complementary Initiatives Implementing Electronic Health Record Technology and Care Coordination

Background: Minnesota enacted legislation in 2007 that requires all health care providers in the state to implement an interoperable electronic health record (EHR) system by 2015. 100% of hospitals and 98% of clinics had adopted EHR systems by end of 2015. Minnesota’s 2008 health reform included a h...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Soderberg, Karen, Rajamani, Sripriya, Wholey, Douglas, LaVenture, Martin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: University of Illinois at Chicago Library 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5302470/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28210425
http://dx.doi.org/10.5210/ojphi.v8i3.7094
_version_ 1782506549580660736
author Soderberg, Karen
Rajamani, Sripriya
Wholey, Douglas
LaVenture, Martin
author_facet Soderberg, Karen
Rajamani, Sripriya
Wholey, Douglas
LaVenture, Martin
author_sort Soderberg, Karen
collection PubMed
description Background: Minnesota enacted legislation in 2007 that requires all health care providers in the state to implement an interoperable electronic health record (EHR) system by 2015. 100% of hospitals and 98% of clinics had adopted EHR systems by end of 2015. Minnesota’s 2008 health reform included a health care home (HCH) program, Minnesota’s patient centered medical home. By end of 2014, 43% of HCH eligible clinics were certified with 335 certified HCHs and 430 eligible but not certified clinics. Objectives: To study the association between adoption and use of EHRs in primary care clinics and HCH certification, including use of clinical decision support tools, patient registries, electronic exchange of patient information, and availability of patient portals. Methods: Study utilized data from the 2015 Minnesota Health Information Technology Clinic Survey conducted annually by the Minnesota Department of Health. The response rate was 80% with 1,181 of 1,473 Minnesota clinics, including 662 HCH eligible primary care clinics. The comparative analysis focused on certified HCHs (311) and eligible but not certified clinics (351). Results: HCH clinics utilized the various tools of EHR technology at a higher rate than non-HCH clinics. This greater utilization was noted across a range of functionalities: clinical decision support, patient disease registries, EHR to support quality improvement, electronic exchange of summary care records and availability of patient portals. HCH certification was significant for clinical decision support tools, registries and quality improvement. Conclusions: HCH requirements of care management, care coordination and quality improvement can be better supported with EHR technology, which underscores the higher rate of utilization of EHR tools by HCH clinics. Optimizing electronic exchange of health information remains a challenge for all clinics, including HCH certified clinics. This research presents the synergy between complementary initiatives supporting EHR adoption and HCH certification. Ultimately, improvement in health outcomes depends on effective intersection of people, processes and technology.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5302470
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher University of Illinois at Chicago Library
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53024702017-02-16 Health Reform in Minnesota: An Analysis of Complementary Initiatives Implementing Electronic Health Record Technology and Care Coordination Soderberg, Karen Rajamani, Sripriya Wholey, Douglas LaVenture, Martin Online J Public Health Inform Research Article Background: Minnesota enacted legislation in 2007 that requires all health care providers in the state to implement an interoperable electronic health record (EHR) system by 2015. 100% of hospitals and 98% of clinics had adopted EHR systems by end of 2015. Minnesota’s 2008 health reform included a health care home (HCH) program, Minnesota’s patient centered medical home. By end of 2014, 43% of HCH eligible clinics were certified with 335 certified HCHs and 430 eligible but not certified clinics. Objectives: To study the association between adoption and use of EHRs in primary care clinics and HCH certification, including use of clinical decision support tools, patient registries, electronic exchange of patient information, and availability of patient portals. Methods: Study utilized data from the 2015 Minnesota Health Information Technology Clinic Survey conducted annually by the Minnesota Department of Health. The response rate was 80% with 1,181 of 1,473 Minnesota clinics, including 662 HCH eligible primary care clinics. The comparative analysis focused on certified HCHs (311) and eligible but not certified clinics (351). Results: HCH clinics utilized the various tools of EHR technology at a higher rate than non-HCH clinics. This greater utilization was noted across a range of functionalities: clinical decision support, patient disease registries, EHR to support quality improvement, electronic exchange of summary care records and availability of patient portals. HCH certification was significant for clinical decision support tools, registries and quality improvement. Conclusions: HCH requirements of care management, care coordination and quality improvement can be better supported with EHR technology, which underscores the higher rate of utilization of EHR tools by HCH clinics. Optimizing electronic exchange of health information remains a challenge for all clinics, including HCH certified clinics. This research presents the synergy between complementary initiatives supporting EHR adoption and HCH certification. Ultimately, improvement in health outcomes depends on effective intersection of people, processes and technology. University of Illinois at Chicago Library 2016-12-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5302470/ /pubmed/28210425 http://dx.doi.org/10.5210/ojphi.v8i3.7094 Text en This is an Open Access article. Authors own copyright of their articles appearing in the Journal of Public Health Informatics. Readers may copy articles without permission of the copyright owner(s), as long as the author and OJPHI are acknowledged in the copy and the copy is used for educational, not-for-profit purposes.
spellingShingle Research Article
Soderberg, Karen
Rajamani, Sripriya
Wholey, Douglas
LaVenture, Martin
Health Reform in Minnesota: An Analysis of Complementary Initiatives Implementing Electronic Health Record Technology and Care Coordination
title Health Reform in Minnesota: An Analysis of Complementary Initiatives Implementing Electronic Health Record Technology and Care Coordination
title_full Health Reform in Minnesota: An Analysis of Complementary Initiatives Implementing Electronic Health Record Technology and Care Coordination
title_fullStr Health Reform in Minnesota: An Analysis of Complementary Initiatives Implementing Electronic Health Record Technology and Care Coordination
title_full_unstemmed Health Reform in Minnesota: An Analysis of Complementary Initiatives Implementing Electronic Health Record Technology and Care Coordination
title_short Health Reform in Minnesota: An Analysis of Complementary Initiatives Implementing Electronic Health Record Technology and Care Coordination
title_sort health reform in minnesota: an analysis of complementary initiatives implementing electronic health record technology and care coordination
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5302470/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28210425
http://dx.doi.org/10.5210/ojphi.v8i3.7094
work_keys_str_mv AT soderbergkaren healthreforminminnesotaananalysisofcomplementaryinitiativesimplementingelectronichealthrecordtechnologyandcarecoordination
AT rajamanisripriya healthreforminminnesotaananalysisofcomplementaryinitiativesimplementingelectronichealthrecordtechnologyandcarecoordination
AT wholeydouglas healthreforminminnesotaananalysisofcomplementaryinitiativesimplementingelectronichealthrecordtechnologyandcarecoordination
AT laventuremartin healthreforminminnesotaananalysisofcomplementaryinitiativesimplementingelectronichealthrecordtechnologyandcarecoordination