Cargando…

Spontaneous activation of visual pigments in relation to openness/closedness of chromophore-binding pocket

Visual pigments can be spontaneously activated by internal thermal energy, generating noise that interferes with real-light detection. Recently, we developed a physicochemical theory that successfully predicts the rate of spontaneous activity of representative rod and cone pigments from their peak-a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yue, Wendy Wing Sze, Frederiksen, Rikard, Ren, Xiaozhi, Luo, Dong-Gen, Yamashita, Takahiro, Shichida, Yoshinori, Cornwall, M Carter, Yau, King-Wai
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5302883/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28186874
http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.18492
Descripción
Sumario:Visual pigments can be spontaneously activated by internal thermal energy, generating noise that interferes with real-light detection. Recently, we developed a physicochemical theory that successfully predicts the rate of spontaneous activity of representative rod and cone pigments from their peak-absorption wavelength (λ(max)), with pigments having longer λ(max) being noisier. Interestingly, cone pigments may generally be ~25 fold noisier than rod pigments of the same λ(max), possibly ascribed to an ‘open’ chromophore-binding pocket in cone pigments defined by the capability of chromophore-exchange in darkness. Here, we show in mice that the λ(max)-dependence of pigment noise could be extended even to a mutant pigment, E122Q-rhodopsin. Moreover, although E122Q-rhodopsin shows some cone-pigment-like characteristics, its noise remained quantitatively predictable by the ‘non-open’ nature of its chromophore-binding pocket as in wild-type rhodopsin. The openness/closedness of the chromophore-binding pocket is potentially a useful indicator of whether a pigment is intended for detecting dim or bright light. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.18492.001