Cargando…

The VEGF rise in blood of bevacizumab patients is not based on tumor escape but a host-blockade of VEGF clearance

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) has become a major target in cancer treatment as it promotes tumor angiogenesis. Therapy with anti-VEGF antibody bevacizumab reportedly induces high levels of circulating VEGF which may potentially contribute to resistance. Based on animal or computational m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alidzanovic, Lejla, Starlinger, Patrick, Schauer, Dominic, Maier, Thomas, Feldman, Alexandra, Buchberger, Elisabeth, Stift, Judith, Koeck, Ulrike, Pop, Lorand, Gruenberger, Birgit, Gruenberger, Thomas, Brostjan, Christine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Impact Journals LLC 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5302983/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27527865
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.11084
_version_ 1782506653372907520
author Alidzanovic, Lejla
Starlinger, Patrick
Schauer, Dominic
Maier, Thomas
Feldman, Alexandra
Buchberger, Elisabeth
Stift, Judith
Koeck, Ulrike
Pop, Lorand
Gruenberger, Birgit
Gruenberger, Thomas
Brostjan, Christine
author_facet Alidzanovic, Lejla
Starlinger, Patrick
Schauer, Dominic
Maier, Thomas
Feldman, Alexandra
Buchberger, Elisabeth
Stift, Judith
Koeck, Ulrike
Pop, Lorand
Gruenberger, Birgit
Gruenberger, Thomas
Brostjan, Christine
author_sort Alidzanovic, Lejla
collection PubMed
description Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) has become a major target in cancer treatment as it promotes tumor angiogenesis. Therapy with anti-VEGF antibody bevacizumab reportedly induces high levels of circulating VEGF which may potentially contribute to resistance. Based on animal or computational models, mechanisms of VEGF induction by bevacizumab have been proposed but not verified in the clinical setting. Hence, we evaluated sixty patients with colorectal cancer metastases for changes in plasma VEGF during neoadjuvant/conversion and adjuvant chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab. VEGF expression was assessed in tissue sections of liver metastases. The VEGF source was investigated with in vitro cultures of tumor, endothelial cells, fibroblasts and platelets, and potential protein stabilization due to anti-VEGF therapy was addressed. A VEGF rise was observed in blood of bevacizumab patients but not in chemotherapy controls, and VEGF was found to be largely complexed by the antibody. A comparable VEGF increase occurred in the presence (neoadjuvant) and absence of the tumor (adjuvant). Accordingly, VEGF expression in tumor tissue was not determined by bevacizumab treatment. Investigations with isolated cell types did not reveal VEGF production in response to bevacizumab. However, antibody addition to endothelial cultures led to a dose-dependent blockade of VEGF internalization and hence stabilized VEGF in the supernatant. In conclusion, the VEGF rise in cancer patients treated with bevacizumab is not originating from the tumor. The accumulation of primarily host-derived VEGF in circulation can be explained by antibody interference with receptor-mediated endocytosis and protein degradation. Thus, the VEGF increase in response to bevacizumab therapy should not be regarded as a tumor escape mechanism.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5302983
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Impact Journals LLC
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53029832017-02-13 The VEGF rise in blood of bevacizumab patients is not based on tumor escape but a host-blockade of VEGF clearance Alidzanovic, Lejla Starlinger, Patrick Schauer, Dominic Maier, Thomas Feldman, Alexandra Buchberger, Elisabeth Stift, Judith Koeck, Ulrike Pop, Lorand Gruenberger, Birgit Gruenberger, Thomas Brostjan, Christine Oncotarget Research Paper Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) has become a major target in cancer treatment as it promotes tumor angiogenesis. Therapy with anti-VEGF antibody bevacizumab reportedly induces high levels of circulating VEGF which may potentially contribute to resistance. Based on animal or computational models, mechanisms of VEGF induction by bevacizumab have been proposed but not verified in the clinical setting. Hence, we evaluated sixty patients with colorectal cancer metastases for changes in plasma VEGF during neoadjuvant/conversion and adjuvant chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab. VEGF expression was assessed in tissue sections of liver metastases. The VEGF source was investigated with in vitro cultures of tumor, endothelial cells, fibroblasts and platelets, and potential protein stabilization due to anti-VEGF therapy was addressed. A VEGF rise was observed in blood of bevacizumab patients but not in chemotherapy controls, and VEGF was found to be largely complexed by the antibody. A comparable VEGF increase occurred in the presence (neoadjuvant) and absence of the tumor (adjuvant). Accordingly, VEGF expression in tumor tissue was not determined by bevacizumab treatment. Investigations with isolated cell types did not reveal VEGF production in response to bevacizumab. However, antibody addition to endothelial cultures led to a dose-dependent blockade of VEGF internalization and hence stabilized VEGF in the supernatant. In conclusion, the VEGF rise in cancer patients treated with bevacizumab is not originating from the tumor. The accumulation of primarily host-derived VEGF in circulation can be explained by antibody interference with receptor-mediated endocytosis and protein degradation. Thus, the VEGF increase in response to bevacizumab therapy should not be regarded as a tumor escape mechanism. Impact Journals LLC 2016-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5302983/ /pubmed/27527865 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.11084 Text en Copyright: © 2016 Alidzanovic et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Alidzanovic, Lejla
Starlinger, Patrick
Schauer, Dominic
Maier, Thomas
Feldman, Alexandra
Buchberger, Elisabeth
Stift, Judith
Koeck, Ulrike
Pop, Lorand
Gruenberger, Birgit
Gruenberger, Thomas
Brostjan, Christine
The VEGF rise in blood of bevacizumab patients is not based on tumor escape but a host-blockade of VEGF clearance
title The VEGF rise in blood of bevacizumab patients is not based on tumor escape but a host-blockade of VEGF clearance
title_full The VEGF rise in blood of bevacizumab patients is not based on tumor escape but a host-blockade of VEGF clearance
title_fullStr The VEGF rise in blood of bevacizumab patients is not based on tumor escape but a host-blockade of VEGF clearance
title_full_unstemmed The VEGF rise in blood of bevacizumab patients is not based on tumor escape but a host-blockade of VEGF clearance
title_short The VEGF rise in blood of bevacizumab patients is not based on tumor escape but a host-blockade of VEGF clearance
title_sort vegf rise in blood of bevacizumab patients is not based on tumor escape but a host-blockade of vegf clearance
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5302983/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27527865
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.11084
work_keys_str_mv AT alidzanoviclejla thevegfriseinbloodofbevacizumabpatientsisnotbasedontumorescapebutahostblockadeofvegfclearance
AT starlingerpatrick thevegfriseinbloodofbevacizumabpatientsisnotbasedontumorescapebutahostblockadeofvegfclearance
AT schauerdominic thevegfriseinbloodofbevacizumabpatientsisnotbasedontumorescapebutahostblockadeofvegfclearance
AT maierthomas thevegfriseinbloodofbevacizumabpatientsisnotbasedontumorescapebutahostblockadeofvegfclearance
AT feldmanalexandra thevegfriseinbloodofbevacizumabpatientsisnotbasedontumorescapebutahostblockadeofvegfclearance
AT buchbergerelisabeth thevegfriseinbloodofbevacizumabpatientsisnotbasedontumorescapebutahostblockadeofvegfclearance
AT stiftjudith thevegfriseinbloodofbevacizumabpatientsisnotbasedontumorescapebutahostblockadeofvegfclearance
AT koeckulrike thevegfriseinbloodofbevacizumabpatientsisnotbasedontumorescapebutahostblockadeofvegfclearance
AT poplorand thevegfriseinbloodofbevacizumabpatientsisnotbasedontumorescapebutahostblockadeofvegfclearance
AT gruenbergerbirgit thevegfriseinbloodofbevacizumabpatientsisnotbasedontumorescapebutahostblockadeofvegfclearance
AT gruenbergerthomas thevegfriseinbloodofbevacizumabpatientsisnotbasedontumorescapebutahostblockadeofvegfclearance
AT brostjanchristine thevegfriseinbloodofbevacizumabpatientsisnotbasedontumorescapebutahostblockadeofvegfclearance
AT alidzanoviclejla vegfriseinbloodofbevacizumabpatientsisnotbasedontumorescapebutahostblockadeofvegfclearance
AT starlingerpatrick vegfriseinbloodofbevacizumabpatientsisnotbasedontumorescapebutahostblockadeofvegfclearance
AT schauerdominic vegfriseinbloodofbevacizumabpatientsisnotbasedontumorescapebutahostblockadeofvegfclearance
AT maierthomas vegfriseinbloodofbevacizumabpatientsisnotbasedontumorescapebutahostblockadeofvegfclearance
AT feldmanalexandra vegfriseinbloodofbevacizumabpatientsisnotbasedontumorescapebutahostblockadeofvegfclearance
AT buchbergerelisabeth vegfriseinbloodofbevacizumabpatientsisnotbasedontumorescapebutahostblockadeofvegfclearance
AT stiftjudith vegfriseinbloodofbevacizumabpatientsisnotbasedontumorescapebutahostblockadeofvegfclearance
AT koeckulrike vegfriseinbloodofbevacizumabpatientsisnotbasedontumorescapebutahostblockadeofvegfclearance
AT poplorand vegfriseinbloodofbevacizumabpatientsisnotbasedontumorescapebutahostblockadeofvegfclearance
AT gruenbergerbirgit vegfriseinbloodofbevacizumabpatientsisnotbasedontumorescapebutahostblockadeofvegfclearance
AT gruenbergerthomas vegfriseinbloodofbevacizumabpatientsisnotbasedontumorescapebutahostblockadeofvegfclearance
AT brostjanchristine vegfriseinbloodofbevacizumabpatientsisnotbasedontumorescapebutahostblockadeofvegfclearance