Cargando…
Comparative studies on the multi-component pharmacokinetics of Aristolochiae Fructus and honey-fried Aristolochiae Fructus extracts after oral administration in rats
BACKGROUND: Aristolochiae Fructus (AF) and honey-fried Aristolochiae Fructus (HAF) have been used in China for a long time as anti-tussive and expectorant drugs. Few clinical cases have been reported to be associated with the toxicity of AF and HAF, although relatively high amounts of aristolochic a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5303205/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28187732 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12906-017-1626-2 |
_version_ | 1782506664093548544 |
---|---|
author | Yuan, Jinbin Ren, Gang Liang, Jian Wang, Chong-Zhi Yan, Zhihong Huang, Qun Li, Jiankang Chen, Yang Tang, Yi Liu, Xiaofei Yuan, Chun-Su |
author_facet | Yuan, Jinbin Ren, Gang Liang, Jian Wang, Chong-Zhi Yan, Zhihong Huang, Qun Li, Jiankang Chen, Yang Tang, Yi Liu, Xiaofei Yuan, Chun-Su |
author_sort | Yuan, Jinbin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Aristolochiae Fructus (AF) and honey-fried Aristolochiae Fructus (HAF) have been used in China for a long time as anti-tussive and expectorant drugs. Few clinical cases have been reported to be associated with the toxicity of AF and HAF, although relatively high amounts of aristolochic acids (AAs) have been found in them. Our previous experiments have verified from the chemical changes and from traditional toxicology that honey-processing can significantly reduce the toxicity of AF. To further elucidate the detoxification mechanism of honey-processing, comparative pharmacokinetics of AAs in AF and HAF are performed in this study. METHODS: An HPLC-MS/MS (high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry) method was developed and validated for the determination of AA I, AA II, AA C, AA D and 7-OH AA I in rat plasma. The multi-component pharmacokinetics of AAs in AF and HAF extracts were investigated after the oral administration of three doses to rats. The relative pharmacokinetic parameters were compared systematically. RESULTS: The five AAs shared a similar nonlinear PK (pharmacokinetic) process. They involve rapid absorption and elimination, and they were fit into a two-compartmental open model. Some significant pharmacokinetic differences were observed between the AF and HAF groups: the C (max) and AUC values of AA I and AA II in the AF groups were much higher than those of the HAF groups. CONCLUSIONS: Honey-frying technology can reduce the toxicity of AF by significantly decreasing the absorption of AA I and AA II. The PK parameters obtained in this work could provide valuable references for the toxicity research and clinical use of Aristolochiaceae herbs, including AF and HAF. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: Process diagram of comparative pharmacokinetics study [Image: see text] ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12906-017-1626-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5303205 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53032052017-02-15 Comparative studies on the multi-component pharmacokinetics of Aristolochiae Fructus and honey-fried Aristolochiae Fructus extracts after oral administration in rats Yuan, Jinbin Ren, Gang Liang, Jian Wang, Chong-Zhi Yan, Zhihong Huang, Qun Li, Jiankang Chen, Yang Tang, Yi Liu, Xiaofei Yuan, Chun-Su BMC Complement Altern Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Aristolochiae Fructus (AF) and honey-fried Aristolochiae Fructus (HAF) have been used in China for a long time as anti-tussive and expectorant drugs. Few clinical cases have been reported to be associated with the toxicity of AF and HAF, although relatively high amounts of aristolochic acids (AAs) have been found in them. Our previous experiments have verified from the chemical changes and from traditional toxicology that honey-processing can significantly reduce the toxicity of AF. To further elucidate the detoxification mechanism of honey-processing, comparative pharmacokinetics of AAs in AF and HAF are performed in this study. METHODS: An HPLC-MS/MS (high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry) method was developed and validated for the determination of AA I, AA II, AA C, AA D and 7-OH AA I in rat plasma. The multi-component pharmacokinetics of AAs in AF and HAF extracts were investigated after the oral administration of three doses to rats. The relative pharmacokinetic parameters were compared systematically. RESULTS: The five AAs shared a similar nonlinear PK (pharmacokinetic) process. They involve rapid absorption and elimination, and they were fit into a two-compartmental open model. Some significant pharmacokinetic differences were observed between the AF and HAF groups: the C (max) and AUC values of AA I and AA II in the AF groups were much higher than those of the HAF groups. CONCLUSIONS: Honey-frying technology can reduce the toxicity of AF by significantly decreasing the absorption of AA I and AA II. The PK parameters obtained in this work could provide valuable references for the toxicity research and clinical use of Aristolochiaceae herbs, including AF and HAF. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: Process diagram of comparative pharmacokinetics study [Image: see text] ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12906-017-1626-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5303205/ /pubmed/28187732 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12906-017-1626-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Yuan, Jinbin Ren, Gang Liang, Jian Wang, Chong-Zhi Yan, Zhihong Huang, Qun Li, Jiankang Chen, Yang Tang, Yi Liu, Xiaofei Yuan, Chun-Su Comparative studies on the multi-component pharmacokinetics of Aristolochiae Fructus and honey-fried Aristolochiae Fructus extracts after oral administration in rats |
title | Comparative studies on the multi-component pharmacokinetics of Aristolochiae Fructus and honey-fried Aristolochiae Fructus extracts after oral administration in rats |
title_full | Comparative studies on the multi-component pharmacokinetics of Aristolochiae Fructus and honey-fried Aristolochiae Fructus extracts after oral administration in rats |
title_fullStr | Comparative studies on the multi-component pharmacokinetics of Aristolochiae Fructus and honey-fried Aristolochiae Fructus extracts after oral administration in rats |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative studies on the multi-component pharmacokinetics of Aristolochiae Fructus and honey-fried Aristolochiae Fructus extracts after oral administration in rats |
title_short | Comparative studies on the multi-component pharmacokinetics of Aristolochiae Fructus and honey-fried Aristolochiae Fructus extracts after oral administration in rats |
title_sort | comparative studies on the multi-component pharmacokinetics of aristolochiae fructus and honey-fried aristolochiae fructus extracts after oral administration in rats |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5303205/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28187732 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12906-017-1626-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yuanjinbin comparativestudiesonthemulticomponentpharmacokineticsofaristolochiaefructusandhoneyfriedaristolochiaefructusextractsafteroraladministrationinrats AT rengang comparativestudiesonthemulticomponentpharmacokineticsofaristolochiaefructusandhoneyfriedaristolochiaefructusextractsafteroraladministrationinrats AT liangjian comparativestudiesonthemulticomponentpharmacokineticsofaristolochiaefructusandhoneyfriedaristolochiaefructusextractsafteroraladministrationinrats AT wangchongzhi comparativestudiesonthemulticomponentpharmacokineticsofaristolochiaefructusandhoneyfriedaristolochiaefructusextractsafteroraladministrationinrats AT yanzhihong comparativestudiesonthemulticomponentpharmacokineticsofaristolochiaefructusandhoneyfriedaristolochiaefructusextractsafteroraladministrationinrats AT huangqun comparativestudiesonthemulticomponentpharmacokineticsofaristolochiaefructusandhoneyfriedaristolochiaefructusextractsafteroraladministrationinrats AT lijiankang comparativestudiesonthemulticomponentpharmacokineticsofaristolochiaefructusandhoneyfriedaristolochiaefructusextractsafteroraladministrationinrats AT chenyang comparativestudiesonthemulticomponentpharmacokineticsofaristolochiaefructusandhoneyfriedaristolochiaefructusextractsafteroraladministrationinrats AT tangyi comparativestudiesonthemulticomponentpharmacokineticsofaristolochiaefructusandhoneyfriedaristolochiaefructusextractsafteroraladministrationinrats AT liuxiaofei comparativestudiesonthemulticomponentpharmacokineticsofaristolochiaefructusandhoneyfriedaristolochiaefructusextractsafteroraladministrationinrats AT yuanchunsu comparativestudiesonthemulticomponentpharmacokineticsofaristolochiaefructusandhoneyfriedaristolochiaefructusextractsafteroraladministrationinrats |