Cargando…

The method of attachment influences accelerometer-based activity data in dogs

BACKGROUND: Accelerometer-based activity monitoring is a promising new tool in veterinary medicine used to objectively assess activity levels in dogs. To date, it is unknown how device orientation, attachment method, and attachment of a leash to the collar holding an accelerometer affect canine acti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Martin, Kyle W., Olsen, Anastasia M., Duncan, Colleen G., Duerr, Felix M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5303220/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28187763
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-017-0971-1
_version_ 1782506667530780672
author Martin, Kyle W.
Olsen, Anastasia M.
Duncan, Colleen G.
Duerr, Felix M.
author_facet Martin, Kyle W.
Olsen, Anastasia M.
Duncan, Colleen G.
Duerr, Felix M.
author_sort Martin, Kyle W.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Accelerometer-based activity monitoring is a promising new tool in veterinary medicine used to objectively assess activity levels in dogs. To date, it is unknown how device orientation, attachment method, and attachment of a leash to the collar holding an accelerometer affect canine activity data. It was our goal to evaluate whether attachment methods of accelerometers affect activity counts. Eight healthy, client-owned dogs were fitted with two identical neck collars to which two identical activity monitors were attached using six different methods of attachment. These methods of attachment evaluated the use of a protective case, positioning of the activity monitor and the tightness of attachment of the accelerometer. Lastly, the effect of leash attachment to the collar was evaluated. For trials where the effect of leash attachment to the collar was not being studied, the leash was attached to a harness. Activity data obtained from separate monitors within a given experiment were compared using Pearson correlation coefficients and across all experiments using the Kruskal-Wallis Test. RESULTS: There was excellent correlation and low variability between activity monitors on separate collars when the leash was attached to a harness, regardless of their relative positions. There was good correlation when activity monitors were placed on the same collar regardless of orientation. There were poor correlations between activity monitors in three experiments: when the leash was fastened to the collar that held an activity monitor, when one activity monitor was housed in the protective casing, and when one activity monitor was loosely zip-tied to the collar rather than threaded on using the provided metal loop. Follow-up, pair-wise comparisons identified the correlation associated with these three methods of attachment to be statistically different from the level of correlation when monitors were placed on separate collars. CONCLUSIONS: While accelerometer-based activity monitors are useful tools to objectively assess physical activity in dogs, care must be taken when choosing a method to attach the device. The attachment of the activity monitor to the collar should utilize a second, dedicated collar that is not used for leash attachment and the attachment method should remain consistent throughout a study period.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5303220
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53032202017-02-15 The method of attachment influences accelerometer-based activity data in dogs Martin, Kyle W. Olsen, Anastasia M. Duncan, Colleen G. Duerr, Felix M. BMC Vet Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Accelerometer-based activity monitoring is a promising new tool in veterinary medicine used to objectively assess activity levels in dogs. To date, it is unknown how device orientation, attachment method, and attachment of a leash to the collar holding an accelerometer affect canine activity data. It was our goal to evaluate whether attachment methods of accelerometers affect activity counts. Eight healthy, client-owned dogs were fitted with two identical neck collars to which two identical activity monitors were attached using six different methods of attachment. These methods of attachment evaluated the use of a protective case, positioning of the activity monitor and the tightness of attachment of the accelerometer. Lastly, the effect of leash attachment to the collar was evaluated. For trials where the effect of leash attachment to the collar was not being studied, the leash was attached to a harness. Activity data obtained from separate monitors within a given experiment were compared using Pearson correlation coefficients and across all experiments using the Kruskal-Wallis Test. RESULTS: There was excellent correlation and low variability between activity monitors on separate collars when the leash was attached to a harness, regardless of their relative positions. There was good correlation when activity monitors were placed on the same collar regardless of orientation. There were poor correlations between activity monitors in three experiments: when the leash was fastened to the collar that held an activity monitor, when one activity monitor was housed in the protective casing, and when one activity monitor was loosely zip-tied to the collar rather than threaded on using the provided metal loop. Follow-up, pair-wise comparisons identified the correlation associated with these three methods of attachment to be statistically different from the level of correlation when monitors were placed on separate collars. CONCLUSIONS: While accelerometer-based activity monitors are useful tools to objectively assess physical activity in dogs, care must be taken when choosing a method to attach the device. The attachment of the activity monitor to the collar should utilize a second, dedicated collar that is not used for leash attachment and the attachment method should remain consistent throughout a study period. BioMed Central 2017-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5303220/ /pubmed/28187763 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-017-0971-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Martin, Kyle W.
Olsen, Anastasia M.
Duncan, Colleen G.
Duerr, Felix M.
The method of attachment influences accelerometer-based activity data in dogs
title The method of attachment influences accelerometer-based activity data in dogs
title_full The method of attachment influences accelerometer-based activity data in dogs
title_fullStr The method of attachment influences accelerometer-based activity data in dogs
title_full_unstemmed The method of attachment influences accelerometer-based activity data in dogs
title_short The method of attachment influences accelerometer-based activity data in dogs
title_sort method of attachment influences accelerometer-based activity data in dogs
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5303220/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28187763
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-017-0971-1
work_keys_str_mv AT martinkylew themethodofattachmentinfluencesaccelerometerbasedactivitydataindogs
AT olsenanastasiam themethodofattachmentinfluencesaccelerometerbasedactivitydataindogs
AT duncancolleeng themethodofattachmentinfluencesaccelerometerbasedactivitydataindogs
AT duerrfelixm themethodofattachmentinfluencesaccelerometerbasedactivitydataindogs
AT martinkylew methodofattachmentinfluencesaccelerometerbasedactivitydataindogs
AT olsenanastasiam methodofattachmentinfluencesaccelerometerbasedactivitydataindogs
AT duncancolleeng methodofattachmentinfluencesaccelerometerbasedactivitydataindogs
AT duerrfelixm methodofattachmentinfluencesaccelerometerbasedactivitydataindogs