Cargando…

Long-term outcome following upper extremity replantation after major traumatic amputation

BACKGROUND: Amputations in general and amputations of upper extremities, in particular, have a major impact on patients’ lives. There are only a few long-term follow-up reports of patients after macro-replantation. We present our findings in contrast with the existing literature. METHODS: Sixteen pa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mattiassich, G., Rittenschober, F., Dorninger, L., Rois, J., Mittermayr, R., Ortmaier, R., Ponschab, M., Katzensteiner, K., Larcher, L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5303287/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28187720
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-017-1442-3
_version_ 1782506682796998656
author Mattiassich, G.
Rittenschober, F.
Dorninger, L.
Rois, J.
Mittermayr, R.
Ortmaier, R.
Ponschab, M.
Katzensteiner, K.
Larcher, L.
author_facet Mattiassich, G.
Rittenschober, F.
Dorninger, L.
Rois, J.
Mittermayr, R.
Ortmaier, R.
Ponschab, M.
Katzensteiner, K.
Larcher, L.
author_sort Mattiassich, G.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Amputations in general and amputations of upper extremities, in particular, have a major impact on patients’ lives. There are only a few long-term follow-up reports of patients after macro-replantation. We present our findings in contrast with the existing literature. METHODS: Sixteen patients with traumatic macro-amputation of an upper extremity were eligible for inclusion in this study. Altogether, the patients underwent replantation in 3 institutions between 1983 and 2011. RESULTS: Twelve male and four female patients with an average age at injury of 40.6 years (range, 14–61 years) were included in this study. The mean follow-up period was 13.5 years (range, 4.4–32.6 years; SD, 5.7 years). The mean disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) outcome measure was 41 (range, 5.2–94.8; SD, 18.2), functional independence measurement (FIM) was 125 (range, 120–126; SD, 1.8). Chen I representing very good function was accounted in six, Chen II representing good function in eight, Chen III (fair) in one and Chen IV (bad function) in one patient. CONCLUSIONS: We found that while the majority of the included patients exhibited good or very good function of the extremity, none of the replanted appendages regained normal levels of functionality. In addition, all participants were very satisfied with their outcomes. Positive long-term results with high rates of subjective satisfaction are possible after replantation of upper extremities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5303287
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53032872017-02-15 Long-term outcome following upper extremity replantation after major traumatic amputation Mattiassich, G. Rittenschober, F. Dorninger, L. Rois, J. Mittermayr, R. Ortmaier, R. Ponschab, M. Katzensteiner, K. Larcher, L. BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Amputations in general and amputations of upper extremities, in particular, have a major impact on patients’ lives. There are only a few long-term follow-up reports of patients after macro-replantation. We present our findings in contrast with the existing literature. METHODS: Sixteen patients with traumatic macro-amputation of an upper extremity were eligible for inclusion in this study. Altogether, the patients underwent replantation in 3 institutions between 1983 and 2011. RESULTS: Twelve male and four female patients with an average age at injury of 40.6 years (range, 14–61 years) were included in this study. The mean follow-up period was 13.5 years (range, 4.4–32.6 years; SD, 5.7 years). The mean disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) outcome measure was 41 (range, 5.2–94.8; SD, 18.2), functional independence measurement (FIM) was 125 (range, 120–126; SD, 1.8). Chen I representing very good function was accounted in six, Chen II representing good function in eight, Chen III (fair) in one and Chen IV (bad function) in one patient. CONCLUSIONS: We found that while the majority of the included patients exhibited good or very good function of the extremity, none of the replanted appendages regained normal levels of functionality. In addition, all participants were very satisfied with their outcomes. Positive long-term results with high rates of subjective satisfaction are possible after replantation of upper extremities. BioMed Central 2017-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5303287/ /pubmed/28187720 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-017-1442-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Mattiassich, G.
Rittenschober, F.
Dorninger, L.
Rois, J.
Mittermayr, R.
Ortmaier, R.
Ponschab, M.
Katzensteiner, K.
Larcher, L.
Long-term outcome following upper extremity replantation after major traumatic amputation
title Long-term outcome following upper extremity replantation after major traumatic amputation
title_full Long-term outcome following upper extremity replantation after major traumatic amputation
title_fullStr Long-term outcome following upper extremity replantation after major traumatic amputation
title_full_unstemmed Long-term outcome following upper extremity replantation after major traumatic amputation
title_short Long-term outcome following upper extremity replantation after major traumatic amputation
title_sort long-term outcome following upper extremity replantation after major traumatic amputation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5303287/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28187720
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-017-1442-3
work_keys_str_mv AT mattiassichg longtermoutcomefollowingupperextremityreplantationaftermajortraumaticamputation
AT rittenschoberf longtermoutcomefollowingupperextremityreplantationaftermajortraumaticamputation
AT dorningerl longtermoutcomefollowingupperextremityreplantationaftermajortraumaticamputation
AT roisj longtermoutcomefollowingupperextremityreplantationaftermajortraumaticamputation
AT mittermayrr longtermoutcomefollowingupperextremityreplantationaftermajortraumaticamputation
AT ortmaierr longtermoutcomefollowingupperextremityreplantationaftermajortraumaticamputation
AT ponschabm longtermoutcomefollowingupperextremityreplantationaftermajortraumaticamputation
AT katzensteinerk longtermoutcomefollowingupperextremityreplantationaftermajortraumaticamputation
AT larcherl longtermoutcomefollowingupperextremityreplantationaftermajortraumaticamputation