Cargando…

Integrating consumer engagement in health and medical research – an Australian framework

BACKGROUND: Quality practice of consumer engagement is still in its infancy in many sectors of medical research. The South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI) identified, early in its development, the opportunity to integrate evidence-driven consumer and community engagement in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Miller, Caroline L., Mott, Kathy, Cousins, Michael, Miller, Stephanie, Johnson, Anne, Lawson, Tony, Wesselingh, Steve
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5303288/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28187772
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-017-0171-2
_version_ 1782506683026636800
author Miller, Caroline L.
Mott, Kathy
Cousins, Michael
Miller, Stephanie
Johnson, Anne
Lawson, Tony
Wesselingh, Steve
author_facet Miller, Caroline L.
Mott, Kathy
Cousins, Michael
Miller, Stephanie
Johnson, Anne
Lawson, Tony
Wesselingh, Steve
author_sort Miller, Caroline L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Quality practice of consumer engagement is still in its infancy in many sectors of medical research. The South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI) identified, early in its development, the opportunity to integrate evidence-driven consumer and community engagement into its operations. PROCESS: SAHMRI partnered with Health Consumers Alliance and consumers in evidence generation. A Partnership Steering Committee of researchers and consumers was formed for the project. An iterative mixed-method qualitative process was used to generate a framework for consumer engagement. This process included a literature review followed by semi-structured interviews with experts in consumer engagement and lead medical researchers, group discussions and a consensus workshop with the Partnership Steering Committee, facilitated by Health Consumer Alliance. OUTCOMES: The literature revealed a dearth of evidence about effective consumer engagement methodologies. Four organisational dimensions are reported to contribute to success, namely governance, infrastructure, capacity and advocacy. Key themes identified through the stakeholder interviews included sustained leadership, tangible benefits, engagement strategies should be varied, resourcing, a moral dimension, and challenges. The consensus workshop produced a framework and tangible strategies. CONCLUSION: Comprehensive examples of consumer participation in health and medical research are limited. There are few documented studies of what techniques are effective. This evidence-driven framework, developed in collaboration with consumers, is being integrated in a health and medical research institute with diverse programs of research. This framework is offered as a contribution to the evidence base around meaningful consumer engagement and as a template for other research institutions to utilise.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5303288
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53032882017-02-15 Integrating consumer engagement in health and medical research – an Australian framework Miller, Caroline L. Mott, Kathy Cousins, Michael Miller, Stephanie Johnson, Anne Lawson, Tony Wesselingh, Steve Health Res Policy Syst Commentary BACKGROUND: Quality practice of consumer engagement is still in its infancy in many sectors of medical research. The South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI) identified, early in its development, the opportunity to integrate evidence-driven consumer and community engagement into its operations. PROCESS: SAHMRI partnered with Health Consumers Alliance and consumers in evidence generation. A Partnership Steering Committee of researchers and consumers was formed for the project. An iterative mixed-method qualitative process was used to generate a framework for consumer engagement. This process included a literature review followed by semi-structured interviews with experts in consumer engagement and lead medical researchers, group discussions and a consensus workshop with the Partnership Steering Committee, facilitated by Health Consumer Alliance. OUTCOMES: The literature revealed a dearth of evidence about effective consumer engagement methodologies. Four organisational dimensions are reported to contribute to success, namely governance, infrastructure, capacity and advocacy. Key themes identified through the stakeholder interviews included sustained leadership, tangible benefits, engagement strategies should be varied, resourcing, a moral dimension, and challenges. The consensus workshop produced a framework and tangible strategies. CONCLUSION: Comprehensive examples of consumer participation in health and medical research are limited. There are few documented studies of what techniques are effective. This evidence-driven framework, developed in collaboration with consumers, is being integrated in a health and medical research institute with diverse programs of research. This framework is offered as a contribution to the evidence base around meaningful consumer engagement and as a template for other research institutions to utilise. BioMed Central 2017-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5303288/ /pubmed/28187772 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-017-0171-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Commentary
Miller, Caroline L.
Mott, Kathy
Cousins, Michael
Miller, Stephanie
Johnson, Anne
Lawson, Tony
Wesselingh, Steve
Integrating consumer engagement in health and medical research – an Australian framework
title Integrating consumer engagement in health and medical research – an Australian framework
title_full Integrating consumer engagement in health and medical research – an Australian framework
title_fullStr Integrating consumer engagement in health and medical research – an Australian framework
title_full_unstemmed Integrating consumer engagement in health and medical research – an Australian framework
title_short Integrating consumer engagement in health and medical research – an Australian framework
title_sort integrating consumer engagement in health and medical research – an australian framework
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5303288/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28187772
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-017-0171-2
work_keys_str_mv AT millercarolinel integratingconsumerengagementinhealthandmedicalresearchanaustralianframework
AT mottkathy integratingconsumerengagementinhealthandmedicalresearchanaustralianframework
AT cousinsmichael integratingconsumerengagementinhealthandmedicalresearchanaustralianframework
AT millerstephanie integratingconsumerengagementinhealthandmedicalresearchanaustralianframework
AT johnsonanne integratingconsumerengagementinhealthandmedicalresearchanaustralianframework
AT lawsontony integratingconsumerengagementinhealthandmedicalresearchanaustralianframework
AT wesselinghsteve integratingconsumerengagementinhealthandmedicalresearchanaustralianframework