Cargando…
Evaluation of conventional, protaper hand and protaper rotary instrumentation system for apical extrusion of debris, irrigants and bacteria- An in vitro randomized trial
BACKGROUND: Endodontic instrumentation carries the risk of over extrusion of debris and bacteria. The technique used and the type of instrumentation influences this risk. AIM: The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the K-file, ProTaper hand and ProTaper rotary instrumentation systems...
Autores principales: | Kalra, Pinky, Rao, Arathi, Suman, Ethel, Shenoy, Ramya, Suprabha, Baranya-Shrikrishna |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medicina Oral S.L.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5303327/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28210445 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.53340 |
Ejemplares similares
-
A Comparison of the Apical Extrusion of Debris during the Preparation of Root Canal with Medin, RaCe, and ProTaper Rotary Systems
por: Nabavizadeh, Mohammadreza, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Apical extrusion of debris and irrigants using ProTaper hand, M-two rotary and WaveOne single file reciprocating system: An ex vivo study
por: Singh, Abhishek, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Comparative evaluation of apical extrusion of intracanal bacteria using ProTaper Next, Mtwo, and ProTaper rotary systems: An in vitro study
por: Polineni, Swapnika, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Comparison of debris extruded apically and working time used by ProTaper
Universal rotary and ProTaper retreatment system during gutta-percha
removal
por: UEZU, Mary Kinue Nakamune, et al.
Publicado: (2010) -
Apical Debris Extrusion with Conventional Rotary and Reciprocating Instruments
por: Eshagh Saberi, Ali, et al.
Publicado: (2020)