Cargando…
Erectile dysfunction post-radical prostatectomy – a challenge for both patient and physician
Post-radical prostatectomy erectile dysfunction (post RP ED) is a major postoperative complication with a great impact on the quality of life of the patients. Until present, no proper algorithm or guideline based on the clinical trials has been established for the management of post RP ED. According...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Carol Davila University Press
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5304365/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28255370 |
_version_ | 1782506871228203008 |
---|---|
author | Bratu, O Oprea, I Marcu, D Spinu, D Niculae, A Geavlete, B Mischianu, D |
author_facet | Bratu, O Oprea, I Marcu, D Spinu, D Niculae, A Geavlete, B Mischianu, D |
author_sort | Bratu, O |
collection | PubMed |
description | Post-radical prostatectomy erectile dysfunction (post RP ED) is a major postoperative complication with a great impact on the quality of life of the patients. Until present, no proper algorithm or guideline based on the clinical trials has been established for the management of post RP ED. According to literature, it is better to initiate a penile rehabilitation program as soon as possible after surgery than doing nothing, in order to prevent and limit the postoperative local hypoxygenation and fibrosis. The results of numerous clinical trials regarding the effectiveness of the phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors therapy on post RP ED have made them the gold standard treatment. Encouraging results have been achieved in studies with vacuum erectile devices, intraurethral suppositories with alprostadil and intracavernosal injections, but due to their side effects, especially in the cases of intracavernosal injections and intraurethral suppositories, their clinical use was limited therefore making them a second line option for the post RP ED treatment. What should not be forgotten is that penile implant prosthesis has proven very effective, numerous studies confirming high rates of satisfaction for both patients and partners. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5304365 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Carol Davila University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53043652017-03-02 Erectile dysfunction post-radical prostatectomy – a challenge for both patient and physician Bratu, O Oprea, I Marcu, D Spinu, D Niculae, A Geavlete, B Mischianu, D J Med Life Reviews Post-radical prostatectomy erectile dysfunction (post RP ED) is a major postoperative complication with a great impact on the quality of life of the patients. Until present, no proper algorithm or guideline based on the clinical trials has been established for the management of post RP ED. According to literature, it is better to initiate a penile rehabilitation program as soon as possible after surgery than doing nothing, in order to prevent and limit the postoperative local hypoxygenation and fibrosis. The results of numerous clinical trials regarding the effectiveness of the phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors therapy on post RP ED have made them the gold standard treatment. Encouraging results have been achieved in studies with vacuum erectile devices, intraurethral suppositories with alprostadil and intracavernosal injections, but due to their side effects, especially in the cases of intracavernosal injections and intraurethral suppositories, their clinical use was limited therefore making them a second line option for the post RP ED treatment. What should not be forgotten is that penile implant prosthesis has proven very effective, numerous studies confirming high rates of satisfaction for both patients and partners. Carol Davila University Press 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5304365/ /pubmed/28255370 Text en ©Carol Davila University Press This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/), which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Reviews Bratu, O Oprea, I Marcu, D Spinu, D Niculae, A Geavlete, B Mischianu, D Erectile dysfunction post-radical prostatectomy – a challenge for both patient and physician |
title | Erectile dysfunction post-radical prostatectomy – a challenge for both patient and physician
|
title_full | Erectile dysfunction post-radical prostatectomy – a challenge for both patient and physician
|
title_fullStr | Erectile dysfunction post-radical prostatectomy – a challenge for both patient and physician
|
title_full_unstemmed | Erectile dysfunction post-radical prostatectomy – a challenge for both patient and physician
|
title_short | Erectile dysfunction post-radical prostatectomy – a challenge for both patient and physician
|
title_sort | erectile dysfunction post-radical prostatectomy – a challenge for both patient and physician |
topic | Reviews |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5304365/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28255370 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bratuo erectiledysfunctionpostradicalprostatectomyachallengeforbothpatientandphysician AT opreai erectiledysfunctionpostradicalprostatectomyachallengeforbothpatientandphysician AT marcud erectiledysfunctionpostradicalprostatectomyachallengeforbothpatientandphysician AT spinud erectiledysfunctionpostradicalprostatectomyachallengeforbothpatientandphysician AT niculaea erectiledysfunctionpostradicalprostatectomyachallengeforbothpatientandphysician AT geavleteb erectiledysfunctionpostradicalprostatectomyachallengeforbothpatientandphysician AT mischianud erectiledysfunctionpostradicalprostatectomyachallengeforbothpatientandphysician |