Cargando…
Roll vection in migraine and controls using inertial nulling and certainty estimate techniques
Vection is an illusory perception of self-motion that occurs when a visual motion is presented in the majority of the visual field. We used certainty estimate (CE) and inertial nulling (IN) techniques to study the effect of visual stimuli on roll perception in 10 migraine and 9 control subjects. A v...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5305052/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28192443 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171332 |
_version_ | 1782506986699489280 |
---|---|
author | Miller, Mark Andrew Crane, Benjamin Thomas |
author_facet | Miller, Mark Andrew Crane, Benjamin Thomas |
author_sort | Miller, Mark Andrew |
collection | PubMed |
description | Vection is an illusory perception of self-motion that occurs when a visual motion is presented in the majority of the visual field. We used certainty estimate (CE) and inertial nulling (IN) techniques to study the effect of visual stimuli on roll perception in 10 migraine and 9 control subjects. A visual roll stimulus was presented for 1 to 8s. For the IN method, an inertial stimulus was delivered during the final 1s of the visual stimulus during which subjects judged the direction of perceived motion. The inertial motion was varied to find the point of subjective equality (PSE) at which both responses were equally likely to be reported. For the CE trials, the same durations of visual motion were used but without inertial motion and subjects rated their certainty of motion on a scale of 0–100. The overall difference in PSE between 1s and 8s subjects is significant (p = 0.03). Migraineurs had a ten fold larger effect in IN studies in the 8s than 1s (p = 0.01), but controls did not have a significant difference (p = 0.72). Unlike the control population, in migraineurs the perception of roll increased significantly with the duration of the visual stimulus. There was a large variation between subjects with both the CE and IN measures. The CE measure was poorly correlated with IN measures but demonstrated a similar trend with larger variation between subjects. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5305052 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53050522017-02-28 Roll vection in migraine and controls using inertial nulling and certainty estimate techniques Miller, Mark Andrew Crane, Benjamin Thomas PLoS One Research Article Vection is an illusory perception of self-motion that occurs when a visual motion is presented in the majority of the visual field. We used certainty estimate (CE) and inertial nulling (IN) techniques to study the effect of visual stimuli on roll perception in 10 migraine and 9 control subjects. A visual roll stimulus was presented for 1 to 8s. For the IN method, an inertial stimulus was delivered during the final 1s of the visual stimulus during which subjects judged the direction of perceived motion. The inertial motion was varied to find the point of subjective equality (PSE) at which both responses were equally likely to be reported. For the CE trials, the same durations of visual motion were used but without inertial motion and subjects rated their certainty of motion on a scale of 0–100. The overall difference in PSE between 1s and 8s subjects is significant (p = 0.03). Migraineurs had a ten fold larger effect in IN studies in the 8s than 1s (p = 0.01), but controls did not have a significant difference (p = 0.72). Unlike the control population, in migraineurs the perception of roll increased significantly with the duration of the visual stimulus. There was a large variation between subjects with both the CE and IN measures. The CE measure was poorly correlated with IN measures but demonstrated a similar trend with larger variation between subjects. Public Library of Science 2017-02-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5305052/ /pubmed/28192443 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171332 Text en © 2017 Miller, Crane http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Miller, Mark Andrew Crane, Benjamin Thomas Roll vection in migraine and controls using inertial nulling and certainty estimate techniques |
title | Roll vection in migraine and controls using inertial nulling and certainty estimate techniques |
title_full | Roll vection in migraine and controls using inertial nulling and certainty estimate techniques |
title_fullStr | Roll vection in migraine and controls using inertial nulling and certainty estimate techniques |
title_full_unstemmed | Roll vection in migraine and controls using inertial nulling and certainty estimate techniques |
title_short | Roll vection in migraine and controls using inertial nulling and certainty estimate techniques |
title_sort | roll vection in migraine and controls using inertial nulling and certainty estimate techniques |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5305052/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28192443 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171332 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT millermarkandrew rollvectioninmigraineandcontrolsusinginertialnullingandcertaintyestimatetechniques AT cranebenjaminthomas rollvectioninmigraineandcontrolsusinginertialnullingandcertaintyestimatetechniques |