Cargando…

Sexual selection constrains the body mass of male but not female mice

Sexual size dimorphism results when female and male body size is influenced differently by natural and sexual selection. Typically, in polygynous species larger male body size is thought to be favored in competition for mates and constraints on maximal body size are due to countervailing natural sel...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ruff, James S., Cornwall, Douglas H., Morrison, Linda C., Cauceglia, Joseph W., Nelson, Adam C., Gaukler, Shannon M., Meagher, Shawn, Carroll, Lara S., Potts, Wayne K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5306010/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28303195
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2753
_version_ 1782507120078356480
author Ruff, James S.
Cornwall, Douglas H.
Morrison, Linda C.
Cauceglia, Joseph W.
Nelson, Adam C.
Gaukler, Shannon M.
Meagher, Shawn
Carroll, Lara S.
Potts, Wayne K.
author_facet Ruff, James S.
Cornwall, Douglas H.
Morrison, Linda C.
Cauceglia, Joseph W.
Nelson, Adam C.
Gaukler, Shannon M.
Meagher, Shawn
Carroll, Lara S.
Potts, Wayne K.
author_sort Ruff, James S.
collection PubMed
description Sexual size dimorphism results when female and male body size is influenced differently by natural and sexual selection. Typically, in polygynous species larger male body size is thought to be favored in competition for mates and constraints on maximal body size are due to countervailing natural selection on either sex; however, it has been postulated that sexual selection itself may result in stabilizing selection at an optimal mass. Here we test this hypothesis by retrospectively assessing the influence of body mass, one metric of body size, on the fitness of 113 wild‐derived house mice (Mus musculus) residing within ten replicate semi‐natural enclosures from previous studies conducted by our laboratory. Enclosures possess similar levels of sexual selection, but relaxed natural selection, relative to natural systems. Heavier females produced more offspring, while males of intermediate mass had the highest fitness. Female results suggest that some aspect of natural selection, absent from enclosures, acts to decrease their body mass, while the upper and lower boundaries of male mass are constrained by sexual selection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5306010
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53060102017-03-16 Sexual selection constrains the body mass of male but not female mice Ruff, James S. Cornwall, Douglas H. Morrison, Linda C. Cauceglia, Joseph W. Nelson, Adam C. Gaukler, Shannon M. Meagher, Shawn Carroll, Lara S. Potts, Wayne K. Ecol Evol Original Research Sexual size dimorphism results when female and male body size is influenced differently by natural and sexual selection. Typically, in polygynous species larger male body size is thought to be favored in competition for mates and constraints on maximal body size are due to countervailing natural selection on either sex; however, it has been postulated that sexual selection itself may result in stabilizing selection at an optimal mass. Here we test this hypothesis by retrospectively assessing the influence of body mass, one metric of body size, on the fitness of 113 wild‐derived house mice (Mus musculus) residing within ten replicate semi‐natural enclosures from previous studies conducted by our laboratory. Enclosures possess similar levels of sexual selection, but relaxed natural selection, relative to natural systems. Heavier females produced more offspring, while males of intermediate mass had the highest fitness. Female results suggest that some aspect of natural selection, absent from enclosures, acts to decrease their body mass, while the upper and lower boundaries of male mass are constrained by sexual selection. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-01-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5306010/ /pubmed/28303195 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2753 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Ruff, James S.
Cornwall, Douglas H.
Morrison, Linda C.
Cauceglia, Joseph W.
Nelson, Adam C.
Gaukler, Shannon M.
Meagher, Shawn
Carroll, Lara S.
Potts, Wayne K.
Sexual selection constrains the body mass of male but not female mice
title Sexual selection constrains the body mass of male but not female mice
title_full Sexual selection constrains the body mass of male but not female mice
title_fullStr Sexual selection constrains the body mass of male but not female mice
title_full_unstemmed Sexual selection constrains the body mass of male but not female mice
title_short Sexual selection constrains the body mass of male but not female mice
title_sort sexual selection constrains the body mass of male but not female mice
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5306010/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28303195
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2753
work_keys_str_mv AT ruffjamess sexualselectionconstrainsthebodymassofmalebutnotfemalemice
AT cornwalldouglash sexualselectionconstrainsthebodymassofmalebutnotfemalemice
AT morrisonlindac sexualselectionconstrainsthebodymassofmalebutnotfemalemice
AT caucegliajosephw sexualselectionconstrainsthebodymassofmalebutnotfemalemice
AT nelsonadamc sexualselectionconstrainsthebodymassofmalebutnotfemalemice
AT gauklershannonm sexualselectionconstrainsthebodymassofmalebutnotfemalemice
AT meaghershawn sexualselectionconstrainsthebodymassofmalebutnotfemalemice
AT carrolllaras sexualselectionconstrainsthebodymassofmalebutnotfemalemice
AT pottswaynek sexualselectionconstrainsthebodymassofmalebutnotfemalemice