Cargando…
Sexual selection constrains the body mass of male but not female mice
Sexual size dimorphism results when female and male body size is influenced differently by natural and sexual selection. Typically, in polygynous species larger male body size is thought to be favored in competition for mates and constraints on maximal body size are due to countervailing natural sel...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5306010/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28303195 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2753 |
_version_ | 1782507120078356480 |
---|---|
author | Ruff, James S. Cornwall, Douglas H. Morrison, Linda C. Cauceglia, Joseph W. Nelson, Adam C. Gaukler, Shannon M. Meagher, Shawn Carroll, Lara S. Potts, Wayne K. |
author_facet | Ruff, James S. Cornwall, Douglas H. Morrison, Linda C. Cauceglia, Joseph W. Nelson, Adam C. Gaukler, Shannon M. Meagher, Shawn Carroll, Lara S. Potts, Wayne K. |
author_sort | Ruff, James S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Sexual size dimorphism results when female and male body size is influenced differently by natural and sexual selection. Typically, in polygynous species larger male body size is thought to be favored in competition for mates and constraints on maximal body size are due to countervailing natural selection on either sex; however, it has been postulated that sexual selection itself may result in stabilizing selection at an optimal mass. Here we test this hypothesis by retrospectively assessing the influence of body mass, one metric of body size, on the fitness of 113 wild‐derived house mice (Mus musculus) residing within ten replicate semi‐natural enclosures from previous studies conducted by our laboratory. Enclosures possess similar levels of sexual selection, but relaxed natural selection, relative to natural systems. Heavier females produced more offspring, while males of intermediate mass had the highest fitness. Female results suggest that some aspect of natural selection, absent from enclosures, acts to decrease their body mass, while the upper and lower boundaries of male mass are constrained by sexual selection. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5306010 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53060102017-03-16 Sexual selection constrains the body mass of male but not female mice Ruff, James S. Cornwall, Douglas H. Morrison, Linda C. Cauceglia, Joseph W. Nelson, Adam C. Gaukler, Shannon M. Meagher, Shawn Carroll, Lara S. Potts, Wayne K. Ecol Evol Original Research Sexual size dimorphism results when female and male body size is influenced differently by natural and sexual selection. Typically, in polygynous species larger male body size is thought to be favored in competition for mates and constraints on maximal body size are due to countervailing natural selection on either sex; however, it has been postulated that sexual selection itself may result in stabilizing selection at an optimal mass. Here we test this hypothesis by retrospectively assessing the influence of body mass, one metric of body size, on the fitness of 113 wild‐derived house mice (Mus musculus) residing within ten replicate semi‐natural enclosures from previous studies conducted by our laboratory. Enclosures possess similar levels of sexual selection, but relaxed natural selection, relative to natural systems. Heavier females produced more offspring, while males of intermediate mass had the highest fitness. Female results suggest that some aspect of natural selection, absent from enclosures, acts to decrease their body mass, while the upper and lower boundaries of male mass are constrained by sexual selection. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-01-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5306010/ /pubmed/28303195 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2753 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Ruff, James S. Cornwall, Douglas H. Morrison, Linda C. Cauceglia, Joseph W. Nelson, Adam C. Gaukler, Shannon M. Meagher, Shawn Carroll, Lara S. Potts, Wayne K. Sexual selection constrains the body mass of male but not female mice |
title | Sexual selection constrains the body mass of male but not female mice |
title_full | Sexual selection constrains the body mass of male but not female mice |
title_fullStr | Sexual selection constrains the body mass of male but not female mice |
title_full_unstemmed | Sexual selection constrains the body mass of male but not female mice |
title_short | Sexual selection constrains the body mass of male but not female mice |
title_sort | sexual selection constrains the body mass of male but not female mice |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5306010/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28303195 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2753 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ruffjamess sexualselectionconstrainsthebodymassofmalebutnotfemalemice AT cornwalldouglash sexualselectionconstrainsthebodymassofmalebutnotfemalemice AT morrisonlindac sexualselectionconstrainsthebodymassofmalebutnotfemalemice AT caucegliajosephw sexualselectionconstrainsthebodymassofmalebutnotfemalemice AT nelsonadamc sexualselectionconstrainsthebodymassofmalebutnotfemalemice AT gauklershannonm sexualselectionconstrainsthebodymassofmalebutnotfemalemice AT meaghershawn sexualselectionconstrainsthebodymassofmalebutnotfemalemice AT carrolllaras sexualselectionconstrainsthebodymassofmalebutnotfemalemice AT pottswaynek sexualselectionconstrainsthebodymassofmalebutnotfemalemice |