Cargando…
Does evaluative scientometrics lose its main focus on scientific quality by the new orientation towards societal impact?
When the meaning of key terms is incompatible in competing taxonomies, a revolution might occur in the field by which the established taxonomy is replaced with another. Since the key term “impact” in scientometrics seems to undergo a taxonomic change, a revolution might be taking place at present: I...
Autores principales: | Bornmann, Lutz, Haunschild, Robin |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5306086/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28239207 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2200-2 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Policy documents as sources for measuring societal impact: how often is climate change research mentioned in policy-related documents?
por: Bornmann, Lutz, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
How many scientific papers are mentioned in policy-related documents? An empirical investigation using Web of Science and Altmetric data
por: Haunschild, Robin, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Can tweets be used to detect problems early with scientific papers? A case study of three retracted COVID-19/SARS-CoV-2 papers
por: Haunschild, Robin, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Do altmetrics correlate with the quality of papers? A large-scale empirical study based on F1000Prime data
por: Bornmann, Lutz, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
How to normalize Twitter counts? A first attempt based on journals in the Twitter Index
por: Bornmann, Lutz, et al.
Publicado: (2016)