Cargando…
The Unresponsive Partner: Roles of Social Status, Auditory Feedback, and Animacy in Coordination of Joint Music Performance
We examined temporal synchronization in joint music performance to determine how social status, auditory feedback, and animacy influence interpersonal coordination. A partner’s coordination can be bidirectional (partners adapt to the actions of one another) or unidirectional (one partner adapts). Ac...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5306131/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28261123 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00149 |
_version_ | 1782507135960088576 |
---|---|
author | Demos, Alexander P. Carter, Daniel J. Wanderley, Marcelo M. Palmer, Caroline |
author_facet | Demos, Alexander P. Carter, Daniel J. Wanderley, Marcelo M. Palmer, Caroline |
author_sort | Demos, Alexander P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | We examined temporal synchronization in joint music performance to determine how social status, auditory feedback, and animacy influence interpersonal coordination. A partner’s coordination can be bidirectional (partners adapt to the actions of one another) or unidirectional (one partner adapts). According to the dynamical systems framework, bidirectional coordination should be the optimal (preferred) state during live performance. To test this, 24 skilled pianists each performed with a confederate while their coordination was measured by the asynchrony in their tone onsets. To promote social balance, half of the participants were told the confederate was a fellow participant – an equal social status. To promote social imbalance, the other half was told the confederate was an experimenter – an unequal social status. In all conditions, the confederate’s arm and finger movements were occluded from the participant’s view to allow manipulation of animacy of the confederate’s performances (live or recorded). Unbeknownst to the participants, half of the confederate’s performances were replaced with pre-recordings, forcing the participant into unidirectional coordination during performance. The other half of the confederate’s performances were live, which permitted bidirectional coordination between performers. In a final manipulation, both performers heard the auditory feedback from one or both of the performers’ parts removed at unpredictable times to disrupt their performance. Consistently larger asynchronies were observed in performances of unidirectional (recorded) than bidirectional (live) performances across all conditions. Participants who were told the confederate was an experimenter reported their synchrony as more successful than when the partner was introduced as a fellow participant. Finally, asynchronies increased as auditory feedback was removed; removal of the confederate’s part hurt coordination more than removal of the participant’s part in live performances. Consistent with the assumption that bidirectional coupling yields optimal coordination, an unresponsive partner requires the other member to do all the adapting for the pair to stay together. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5306131 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53061312017-03-03 The Unresponsive Partner: Roles of Social Status, Auditory Feedback, and Animacy in Coordination of Joint Music Performance Demos, Alexander P. Carter, Daniel J. Wanderley, Marcelo M. Palmer, Caroline Front Psychol Psychology We examined temporal synchronization in joint music performance to determine how social status, auditory feedback, and animacy influence interpersonal coordination. A partner’s coordination can be bidirectional (partners adapt to the actions of one another) or unidirectional (one partner adapts). According to the dynamical systems framework, bidirectional coordination should be the optimal (preferred) state during live performance. To test this, 24 skilled pianists each performed with a confederate while their coordination was measured by the asynchrony in their tone onsets. To promote social balance, half of the participants were told the confederate was a fellow participant – an equal social status. To promote social imbalance, the other half was told the confederate was an experimenter – an unequal social status. In all conditions, the confederate’s arm and finger movements were occluded from the participant’s view to allow manipulation of animacy of the confederate’s performances (live or recorded). Unbeknownst to the participants, half of the confederate’s performances were replaced with pre-recordings, forcing the participant into unidirectional coordination during performance. The other half of the confederate’s performances were live, which permitted bidirectional coordination between performers. In a final manipulation, both performers heard the auditory feedback from one or both of the performers’ parts removed at unpredictable times to disrupt their performance. Consistently larger asynchronies were observed in performances of unidirectional (recorded) than bidirectional (live) performances across all conditions. Participants who were told the confederate was an experimenter reported their synchrony as more successful than when the partner was introduced as a fellow participant. Finally, asynchronies increased as auditory feedback was removed; removal of the confederate’s part hurt coordination more than removal of the participant’s part in live performances. Consistent with the assumption that bidirectional coupling yields optimal coordination, an unresponsive partner requires the other member to do all the adapting for the pair to stay together. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5306131/ /pubmed/28261123 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00149 Text en Copyright © 2017 Demos, Carter, Wanderley and Palmer. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Demos, Alexander P. Carter, Daniel J. Wanderley, Marcelo M. Palmer, Caroline The Unresponsive Partner: Roles of Social Status, Auditory Feedback, and Animacy in Coordination of Joint Music Performance |
title | The Unresponsive Partner: Roles of Social Status, Auditory Feedback, and Animacy in Coordination of Joint Music Performance |
title_full | The Unresponsive Partner: Roles of Social Status, Auditory Feedback, and Animacy in Coordination of Joint Music Performance |
title_fullStr | The Unresponsive Partner: Roles of Social Status, Auditory Feedback, and Animacy in Coordination of Joint Music Performance |
title_full_unstemmed | The Unresponsive Partner: Roles of Social Status, Auditory Feedback, and Animacy in Coordination of Joint Music Performance |
title_short | The Unresponsive Partner: Roles of Social Status, Auditory Feedback, and Animacy in Coordination of Joint Music Performance |
title_sort | unresponsive partner: roles of social status, auditory feedback, and animacy in coordination of joint music performance |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5306131/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28261123 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00149 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT demosalexanderp theunresponsivepartnerrolesofsocialstatusauditoryfeedbackandanimacyincoordinationofjointmusicperformance AT carterdanielj theunresponsivepartnerrolesofsocialstatusauditoryfeedbackandanimacyincoordinationofjointmusicperformance AT wanderleymarcelom theunresponsivepartnerrolesofsocialstatusauditoryfeedbackandanimacyincoordinationofjointmusicperformance AT palmercaroline theunresponsivepartnerrolesofsocialstatusauditoryfeedbackandanimacyincoordinationofjointmusicperformance AT demosalexanderp unresponsivepartnerrolesofsocialstatusauditoryfeedbackandanimacyincoordinationofjointmusicperformance AT carterdanielj unresponsivepartnerrolesofsocialstatusauditoryfeedbackandanimacyincoordinationofjointmusicperformance AT wanderleymarcelom unresponsivepartnerrolesofsocialstatusauditoryfeedbackandanimacyincoordinationofjointmusicperformance AT palmercaroline unresponsivepartnerrolesofsocialstatusauditoryfeedbackandanimacyincoordinationofjointmusicperformance |