Cargando…

Metabolic Fingerprint of PS3-Induced Resistance of Grapevine Leaves against Plasmopara viticola Revealed Differences in Elicitor-Triggered Defenses

Induction of plant resistance against pathogens by defense elicitors constitutes an attractive strategy to reduce the use of fungicides in crop protection. However, all elicitors do not systematically confer protection against pathogens. Elicitor-induced resistance (IR) thus merits to be further cha...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Adrian, Marielle, Lucio, Marianna, Roullier-Gall, Chloé, Héloir, Marie-Claire, Trouvelot, Sophie, Daire, Xavier, Kanawati, Basem, Lemaître-Guillier, Christelle, Poinssot, Benoît, Gougeon, Régis, Schmitt-Kopplin, Philippe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5306141/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28261225
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00101
_version_ 1782507138263810048
author Adrian, Marielle
Lucio, Marianna
Roullier-Gall, Chloé
Héloir, Marie-Claire
Trouvelot, Sophie
Daire, Xavier
Kanawati, Basem
Lemaître-Guillier, Christelle
Poinssot, Benoît
Gougeon, Régis
Schmitt-Kopplin, Philippe
author_facet Adrian, Marielle
Lucio, Marianna
Roullier-Gall, Chloé
Héloir, Marie-Claire
Trouvelot, Sophie
Daire, Xavier
Kanawati, Basem
Lemaître-Guillier, Christelle
Poinssot, Benoît
Gougeon, Régis
Schmitt-Kopplin, Philippe
author_sort Adrian, Marielle
collection PubMed
description Induction of plant resistance against pathogens by defense elicitors constitutes an attractive strategy to reduce the use of fungicides in crop protection. However, all elicitors do not systematically confer protection against pathogens. Elicitor-induced resistance (IR) thus merits to be further characterized in order to understand what makes an elicitor efficient. In this study, the oligosaccharidic defense elicitors H13 and PS3, respectively, ineffective and effective to trigger resistance of grapevine leaves against downy mildew, were used to compare their effect on the global leaf metabolism. Ultra high resolution mass spectrometry (FT-ICR-MS) analysis allowed us to obtain and compare the specific metabolic fingerprint induced by each elicitor and to characterize the associated metabolic pathways. Moreover, erythritol phosphate was identified as a putative marker of elicitor-IR.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5306141
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53061412017-03-03 Metabolic Fingerprint of PS3-Induced Resistance of Grapevine Leaves against Plasmopara viticola Revealed Differences in Elicitor-Triggered Defenses Adrian, Marielle Lucio, Marianna Roullier-Gall, Chloé Héloir, Marie-Claire Trouvelot, Sophie Daire, Xavier Kanawati, Basem Lemaître-Guillier, Christelle Poinssot, Benoît Gougeon, Régis Schmitt-Kopplin, Philippe Front Plant Sci Plant Science Induction of plant resistance against pathogens by defense elicitors constitutes an attractive strategy to reduce the use of fungicides in crop protection. However, all elicitors do not systematically confer protection against pathogens. Elicitor-induced resistance (IR) thus merits to be further characterized in order to understand what makes an elicitor efficient. In this study, the oligosaccharidic defense elicitors H13 and PS3, respectively, ineffective and effective to trigger resistance of grapevine leaves against downy mildew, were used to compare their effect on the global leaf metabolism. Ultra high resolution mass spectrometry (FT-ICR-MS) analysis allowed us to obtain and compare the specific metabolic fingerprint induced by each elicitor and to characterize the associated metabolic pathways. Moreover, erythritol phosphate was identified as a putative marker of elicitor-IR. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5306141/ /pubmed/28261225 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00101 Text en Copyright © 2017 Adrian, Lucio, Roullier-Gall, Héloir, Trouvelot, Daire, Kanawati, Lemaître-Guillier, Poinssot, Gougeon and Schmitt-Kopplin. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Plant Science
Adrian, Marielle
Lucio, Marianna
Roullier-Gall, Chloé
Héloir, Marie-Claire
Trouvelot, Sophie
Daire, Xavier
Kanawati, Basem
Lemaître-Guillier, Christelle
Poinssot, Benoît
Gougeon, Régis
Schmitt-Kopplin, Philippe
Metabolic Fingerprint of PS3-Induced Resistance of Grapevine Leaves against Plasmopara viticola Revealed Differences in Elicitor-Triggered Defenses
title Metabolic Fingerprint of PS3-Induced Resistance of Grapevine Leaves against Plasmopara viticola Revealed Differences in Elicitor-Triggered Defenses
title_full Metabolic Fingerprint of PS3-Induced Resistance of Grapevine Leaves against Plasmopara viticola Revealed Differences in Elicitor-Triggered Defenses
title_fullStr Metabolic Fingerprint of PS3-Induced Resistance of Grapevine Leaves against Plasmopara viticola Revealed Differences in Elicitor-Triggered Defenses
title_full_unstemmed Metabolic Fingerprint of PS3-Induced Resistance of Grapevine Leaves against Plasmopara viticola Revealed Differences in Elicitor-Triggered Defenses
title_short Metabolic Fingerprint of PS3-Induced Resistance of Grapevine Leaves against Plasmopara viticola Revealed Differences in Elicitor-Triggered Defenses
title_sort metabolic fingerprint of ps3-induced resistance of grapevine leaves against plasmopara viticola revealed differences in elicitor-triggered defenses
topic Plant Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5306141/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28261225
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00101
work_keys_str_mv AT adrianmarielle metabolicfingerprintofps3inducedresistanceofgrapevineleavesagainstplasmoparaviticolarevealeddifferencesinelicitortriggereddefenses
AT luciomarianna metabolicfingerprintofps3inducedresistanceofgrapevineleavesagainstplasmoparaviticolarevealeddifferencesinelicitortriggereddefenses
AT roulliergallchloe metabolicfingerprintofps3inducedresistanceofgrapevineleavesagainstplasmoparaviticolarevealeddifferencesinelicitortriggereddefenses
AT heloirmarieclaire metabolicfingerprintofps3inducedresistanceofgrapevineleavesagainstplasmoparaviticolarevealeddifferencesinelicitortriggereddefenses
AT trouvelotsophie metabolicfingerprintofps3inducedresistanceofgrapevineleavesagainstplasmoparaviticolarevealeddifferencesinelicitortriggereddefenses
AT dairexavier metabolicfingerprintofps3inducedresistanceofgrapevineleavesagainstplasmoparaviticolarevealeddifferencesinelicitortriggereddefenses
AT kanawatibasem metabolicfingerprintofps3inducedresistanceofgrapevineleavesagainstplasmoparaviticolarevealeddifferencesinelicitortriggereddefenses
AT lemaitreguillierchristelle metabolicfingerprintofps3inducedresistanceofgrapevineleavesagainstplasmoparaviticolarevealeddifferencesinelicitortriggereddefenses
AT poinssotbenoit metabolicfingerprintofps3inducedresistanceofgrapevineleavesagainstplasmoparaviticolarevealeddifferencesinelicitortriggereddefenses
AT gougeonregis metabolicfingerprintofps3inducedresistanceofgrapevineleavesagainstplasmoparaviticolarevealeddifferencesinelicitortriggereddefenses
AT schmittkopplinphilippe metabolicfingerprintofps3inducedresistanceofgrapevineleavesagainstplasmoparaviticolarevealeddifferencesinelicitortriggereddefenses